Archive pour free videos

Alfred Milner SCHOOL NWO

Posted in .....HISTOIRE...., FRANC MACONNERIE BILDERBERG TRILATERALE ..., sociologie, THEOSOPHIE NEW AGE with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on avril 16, 2011 by rodolphepilaert63






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Right Honourable
The Viscount Milner
The Rt. Hon. The Viscount Milner

In office
5 May 1897 – 6 March 1901
Monarch Victoria
Edward VII
Prime Minister John Gordon Sprigg
William Philip Schreiner
John Gordon Sprigg
Preceded by Sir William Howley Goodenough
Succeeded by Sir Walter Francis Hely-Hutchinson

Administrator of the Transvaal and the Orange River Colony
In office
4 January 1901 – 23 June 1902
Monarch Victoria
Edward VII
Lieutenant Hamilton John Goold-Adams
Preceded by Office Established
Christiaan de Wet
As State President of the Orange Free State (31 May 1902)
Schalk Willem Burger
As President of the South African Republic (31 May 1902)
Succeeded by Himself
As Governor of the Transvaal and Orange River Colony

1st Governor of the Transvaal and Orange River Colony
In office
23 June 1902 – 1 April 1905
Monarch Edward VII
Preceded by Himself
As Administrator the Transvaal and Orange River Colony
Succeeded by The Earl of Selborne

In office
18 April 1918 – 10 January 1919
Monarch George V
Prime Minister David Lloyd George
Preceded by The Earl of Derby
Succeeded by Winston Churchill

In office
10 January 1919 – 13 February 1921
Monarch George V
Prime Minister David Lloyd George
Preceded by Walter Long
Succeeded by Winston Churchill

Born 23 March 1854
Flagge Großherzogtum Hessen ohne Wappen.svg Grand Duchy of Hesse
Died 13 May 1925 (aged 71)
Sturry Court, County of Kent
 United Kingdom
Birth name Alfred Milner
Nationality United Kingdom British
Political party Conservative
Spouse(s) Violet Milner
Alma mater University of Tübingen
King’s College London
Balliol College, Oxford
Occupation Colonial administrator, politician

Alfred Milner, 1st Viscount Milner KG, GCB, GCMG, PC (23 March 1854—13 May 1925) was a British statesman and colonial administrator who played an influential leadership role in the formulation of foreign and domestic policy between the mid-1890s and early 1920s. He was also the key British Empire figure in the events leading up to and following the Anglo-Boer War of 1899–1902 and, while serving as High Commissioner, is additionally noted for mentoring a gathering of young members of the South African Civil Service, informally known as Milner’s Kindergarten who, in some cases, themselves became important figures in administering the British Empire. In the later part of his life, from December 1916 to November 1918, he was second only to Prime Minister David Lloyd George in the decision-making process guiding Britain through the crucial period leading to the end of World War I.



[edit] Early life and education

Milner’s German ancestry dates to his paternal grandmother, married to an Englishman who settled in the Grand Duchy of Hesse (modern state of Hesse in west-central Germany). Their son, Charles Milner, who was educated in Hesse and England, established himself as a physician with a practice in London and later became Reader in English at Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen in the Kingdom of Württemberg (modern state of Baden-Württemberg). His wife was a daughter of Major General John Ready, former Lieutenant Governor of Prince Edward Island and later the Isle of Man. Their only son, Alfred Milner, was born in the Hessian town of Gießen and educated first at Tübingen, then at King’s College School and, from 1872 to 1876, as a scholar of Balliol College, Oxford, studying under the classicist theologian Benjamin Jowett. Having won the Hertford, Craven, Eldon and Derby scholarships, he graduated in 1877 with a first class in classics and was elected to a fellowship at New College, leaving, however, for London in 1879.[1] At Oxford he formed a close friendship with young economic historian Arnold Toynbee, writing a paper in support of his theories of social work and, in 1895, twelve years after his death at the age of 30, penning a tribute, Arnold Toynbee: a Reminiscence.

[edit] Journalism, politics and service in Egypt

Although authorised to practice law after being called to the bar at the Inner Temple in 1881, he joined the staff of the Pall Mall Gazette under John Morley, becoming assistant editor to William Thomas Stead. In 1885 he abandoned journalism for a potential political career as the Liberal candidate for the Harrow division of Middlesex, but lost in the general election. Holding the post of private secretary to George Goschen, he rose in rank when, in 1887, Goschen became Chancellor of the Exchequer and, two years later, used his influence to have Milner appointed under-secretary of finance in Egypt. He remained in Egypt for four years, his period of office coinciding with the first great reforms, after the danger of bankruptcy had been avoided. Returning to England in 1892, he published England and Egypt which, at once, became the authoritative account of the work done since the British occupation. Later that year he received an appointment as chairman of the Board of Inland Revenue. In 1894 he was made CB and in 1895 KCB.

[edit] In South Africa

Sir Alfred Milner remained at the Board of Inland Revenue until 1897. He was regarded as one of the clearest-headed and most judicious officials in the British service, and his position as a man of moderate Liberal views, who had been so closely associated with Goschen at the Treasury, Cromer in Egypt and Hicks-Beach (Lord St Aldwyn) and Sir William Vernon Harcourt while at the Inland Revenue, marked him as one in whom all parties might have confidence. The moment for testing his capacity in the highest degree had now come.

In April, Lord Rosmead resigned his posts of High Commissioner for Southern Africa and Governor of Cape Colony. The situation resulting from the Jameson raid was one of the greatest delicacy and difficulty, and Joseph Chamberlain, now colonial secretary, selected Milner as Lord Rosmead’s successor. The choice was cordially approved by the leaders of the Liberal party and warmly recognized at a 28 March 1897 farewell dinner presided over by the future prime minister Herbert Henry Asquith. The appointment was avowedly made in order that an acceptable British statesman, in whom public confidence was reposed, might go to South Africa to consider all the circumstances and to formulate a policy which should combine the upholding of British interests with the attempt to deal justly with the Transvaal and Orange Free State governments.

Sir Alfred Milner reached the Cape in May 1897 and after the difficulties with President Kruger over the Aliens’ Law had been patched up, he was free by August to make himself personally acquainted with the country and peoples before deciding on the lines of policy to be adopted. Between August 1897 and May 1898 he travelled through Cape Colony, the Bechuanaland Protectorate, Rhodesia and Basutoland. The better to understand the point of view of the Cape Dutch and the burghers of the Transvaal and Orange Free State, Milner also during this period learned both Dutch and the South African « Taal ». He came to the conclusion that there could be no hope of peace and progress in South Africa while there remained the « permanent subjection of British to Dutch in one of the Republics ».

Milner was referring to the situation in the Transvaal where, in the aftermath of the discovery of gold, thousands of fortune seekers had flocked from all over Europe, but mostly Britain. This influx of foreigners, referred to as « Uitlanders », threatened their republic, and Transvaal’s President Kruger refused to give the « Uitlanders » the right to vote. The Afrikaner farmers, known as Boers, had established the Transvaal as their promised land, after their Great Trek out of Cape Colony, a trek whose purpose was to remove themselves as far as possible from British rule. They had already successfully defended the Transvaal’s annexation by the British Empire during the first Anglo-Boer War, a conflict that had emboldened them and resulted in a peace treaty which, lacking a highly convincing pretext, made it very difficult for Britain to justify diplomatically another annexation of the Transvaal.

Independent Transvaal thus stood in the way of Britain’s ambition to control all of Africa from Cape to Cairo. Milner realised that, with the discovery of gold in the Transvaal, the balance of power in South Africa had shifted from Cape Town to Johannesburg. He feared that if the whole of South Africa was not quickly brought under British control, the newly-wealthy Transvaal, controlled by Afrikaners, could unite with Cape Afrikaners and jeopardise the entire British position in South Africa. Milner also realised—as was shown by the triumphant re-election of Paul Kruger to the presidency of the Transvaal in February 1898—that the Pretoria government would never on its own initiative redress the grievances of the « Uitlanders« . This gave Milner the pretext to use the « Uitlander » question to his advantage.

Lord Milner Hotel at Matjiesfontein in South Africa.

In a 3 March 1898 speech delivered at Graaff Reinet, an Afrikaner Bond stronghold in the British controlled Cape, he outlined his determination to secure freedom and equality for British subjects in the Transvaal, and he urged the Dutch colonists to induce the Pretoria government to assimilate its institutions, and the temper and spirit of its administration, to those of the free communities of South Africa. The effect of this pronouncement was great and it alarmed the Afrikaners who, at this time, viewed with apprehension the virtual resumption by Cecil Rhodes of leadership of Cape’s Progressive (British) Party.

[edit] Anglophilia

Milner had an unfavorable view of Afrikaners and, as a matter of philosophy, saw the British as « a superior race ». Thus, with limited interest in peaceful resolution of the conflict, he came to the view that British control of the region could only be achieved through war. A negotiated peace was problematic as the Afrikaners outnumbered the British in both the Transvaal, Free State and the Cape. Milner was not alone in his views as evidenced in an 11 March letter written by another Briton, John X. Merriman, to President Steyn of the Orange Free State, « The greatest danger lies in the attitude of President Kruger and his vain hope of building up a State on a foundation of a narrow unenlightened minority, and his obstinate rejection of all prospect of using the materials which lie ready to his hand to establish a true republic on a broad liberal basis. Such a state of affairs cannot last. It must break down from inherent rottenness. »

[edit] Milner Schools

In order to Anglicize the Transvaal area during the Anglo Boer war, Lord Milner set out to influence British Education in the area for the English speaking populations. He founded a series of schools known as the « Milner Schools » in South Africa. These schools consist of modern day Pretoria High School for Girls, Pretoria Boys High School, Potchefstroom High School for Boys, Hamilton Primary School , and St Marys DSG.[2]

Although not all Afrikander Bond leaders liked Kruger, they were ready to support him whether or not he granted reforms and, by the same result, contrived to make Milner’s position untenable. His difficulties were increased when, at the general election in Cape Colony, the Bond obtained a majority. In October 1898, acting strictly in a constitutional manner, Milner called upon William Philip Schreiner to form a ministry, though aware that such a ministry would be opposed to any direct intervention of Great Britain in the Transvaal. Convinced that the existing state of affairs, if continued, would end in the loss of South Africa by Britain, Milner came to England in November 1898. He returned to Cape Colony in February 1899, fully assured of Joseph Chamberlain’s support, though the government still clung to the hope that the moderate section of the Cape and Orange Free State Dutch would induce Kruger to give the vote to the Uitlanders. He found the situation more critical than when he had left, ten weeks previously. Johannesburg was in a ferment, while William Francis Butler, who acted as high commissioner in Milner’s absence, had allowed the inference that he did not support Uitlander grievances.

On 4 May Milner penned a memorable dispatch to the Colonial Office, in which he insisted that the remedy for the unrest in the Transvaal was to strike at the root of the evil—the political impotence of the injured. « It may seem a paradox, » he wrote, « but it is true that the only way for protecting our subjects is to help them to cease to be our subjects. » The policy of leaving things alone only led from bad to worse, and « the case for intervention is overwhelming. » Milner felt that only the enfranchisement of the Uitlanders in the Transvaal would give stability to the South African situation. He had not based his case against the Transvaal on the letter of the Conventions, and regarded the employment of the word « suzerainty » merely as an « etymological question, » but he realized keenly that the spectacle of thousands of British subjects in the Transvaal in the condition of « helots » (as he expressed it) was undermining the prestige of Great Britain throughout South Africa, and he called for « some striking proof » of the intention of the British government not to be ousted from its predominant position. This dispatch was telegraphed to London, and was intended for immediate publication; but it was kept private for a time by the home government.

Its tenor was known, however, to the leading politicians at the Cape, and at the insistence of Jan Hendik Hofmeyr a peace conference was held (31 May – 5 June) at Bloemfontein between the high commissioner and Transvaal President Kruger. Milner made three demands, which he knew could not be accepted by Kruger: The enactment by the Transvaal of a franchise law which would at once give the « Uitlanders » the vote; Use of English in the Transvaal parliament and; That all laws of the parliament should be vetted and approved by the British parliament. Realizing the untenability of his position, Kruger left the meeting in tears.

[edit] The Second Boer War

When the Second Boer War broke out in October 1899, Milner rendered the military authorities « unfailing support and wise counsels », being, in Lord Roberts’s phrase « one whose courage never faltered ». In February 1901, he was called upon to undertake the administration of the two Boer states, both now annexed to the British Empire, though the war was still in progress. He thereupon resigned the governorship of Cape Colony, while retaining the post of high commissioner. During this time at the helm a number of concentration camps were created where 27,000 Boer women and children and more than 14,000 black South Africans died. The work of reconstructing the civil administration in the Transvaal and Orange River Colony could only be carried on to a limited extent while operations continued in the field. Milner therefore returned to England to spend a « hard-begged holiday, » which was, however, mainly occupied in work at the Colonial Office. He reached London on 24 May 1901, had an audience with King Edward VII on the same day, was made a GCB and privy councillor, and was raised to the peerage as Baron Milner, of St James’s in the County of London and of Cape Town in the Colony of the Cape of Good Hope.[3] Speaking next day at a luncheon given in his honor, answering critics who alleged that with more time and patience on the part of Great Britain, war might have been avoided, he asserted that what they were asked to « conciliate » was « panoplied hatred, insensate ambition, invincible ignorance. »

[edit] The peace

Meanwhile the diplomacy of 1899 and the conduct of the war had caused a great change in the attitude of the Liberal party in England towards Lord Milner, whom a prominent Member of Parliament, Leonard Courtney, even characterized as « a lost mind ». A violent agitation for his recall, joined by the Liberal Party leader, Henry Campbell-Bannerman, was organized, however unsuccessfully and, in August, Milner returned to South Africa, plunging into the herculean task of remodelling the administration. In the negotiations for peace he was associated with Lord Kitchener, and the terms of surrender, signed in Pretoria on 31 May 1902, were drafted by him. In recognition of his services he was, on 1 July, made Viscount Milner, of Saint James’s in the County of London and of Cape Town in the Cape Colony.[4] Around this time he became a member of the Coefficients dining club of social reformers set up in 1902 by the Fabian Society campaigners Sidney and Beatrice Webb.

On 21 June, immediately following the conclusion of signatory and ceremonial developments surrounding the end of hostilities, Milner published the Letters Patent establishing the system of crown colony government in the Transvaal and Orange River colonies, and changing his title of administrator to that of governor. The reconstructive work necessary after the ravages of the war was enormous. He provided a steady revenue by the levying of a 10% tax on the annual net produce of the gold mines, and devoted special attention to the repatriation of the Boers, land settlement by British colonists, education, justice, the constabulary, and the development of railways. At Milners suggestion the British government sent Henry Birchenough a businessman and old friend of Milners as special trade commissioner to South Africa with the task of preparing a Blue Book on trade prospects in the aftermath of the war.

While this work of reconstruction was in progress, domestic politics in England were convulsed by the tariff reform movement and Joseph Chamberlain’s resignation. Milner, who was then spending a brief holiday in Europe, was urged by Arthur James Balfour to take the vacant post of secretary of state for the colonies. He declined the offer on 1 October 1903, considering it more important to complete his work in South Africa, where economic depression was becoming pronounced. As of December 1903, he was back in Johannesburg, and had to consider the crisis in the gold-mining industry caused by the shortage of native labor. Reluctantly he agreed, with the assent of the home government, to the proposal of the mineowners to import Chinese coolies on a three-year contract with the first batch of Chinese reaching the Rand in June 1904.

In the latter part of 1904 and the early months of 1905 Milner was engaged in the elaboration of a plan to provide the Transvaal with a system of representative government, a half-way house between crown colony administration and that of self-government. Letters patent providing for representative government were issued on 31 March 1905.

For some time he had been suffering health difficulties from the incessant strain of work, and determined a need to retire, leaving Pretoria on 2 April and sailing for Europe the following day. Speaking in Johannesburg on the eve of his departure, he recommended to all concerned the promotion of the material prosperity of the country and the treatment of Dutch and British on an absolute equality. Having referred to his share in the war, he added: « What I should prefer to be remembered by is a tremendous effort subsequent to the war not only to repair the ravages of that calamity but to re-start the colonies on a higher plane of civilization than they have ever previously attained. »

He left South Africa while the economic crisis was still acute and at a time when the voice of the critic was audible everywhere but, in the words of the colonial secretary Alfred Lyttelton, he had in the eight eventful years of his administration laid deep and strong the foundation upon which a united South Africa would arise to become one of the great states of the empire. Upon returning home, his university bestowed upon him the honorary degree of DCL.

Experience in South Africa had shown him that underlying the difficulties of the situation there was the wider problem of imperial unity. In his farewell speech at Johannesburg he concluded with a reference to the subject. ‘When we who call ourselves Imperialists talk of the British Empire, we think of a group of states bound, not in an alliance or alliances that can be made and unmade but in a permanent organic union. Of such a union the dominions of the sovereign as they exist to-day are only the raw material.’ This thesis he further developed in a magazine article written in view of the colonial conference held in London in 1907. He advocated the creation of a permanent deliberative imperial council, and favored preferential trade relations between the United Kingdom and the other members of the empire; and in later years he took an active part in advocating the cause of tariff reform and Imperial Preference.

In 1910 he became a founder of The Round TableA Quarterly Review of the Politics of the British Empire, which helped to promote the cause of imperial federation.

[edit] Censure motion

In March 1906, a motion censuring Lord Milner for an infraction of the Chinese labour ordinance, in not forbidding light corporal punishment of coolies for minor offences in lieu of imprisonment, was moved by a Radical member of the House of Commons. On behalf of the Liberal government an amendment was moved, stating that ‘This House, while recording its condemnation of the flogging of Chinese coolies in breach of the law, desires, in the interests of peace and conciliation in South Africa, to refrain from passing censure upon individuals’. The amendment was carried by 355 votes to 135. As a result of this left-handed censure, a counter-demonstration was organized, led by Sir Bartle Frere, and a public address, signed by over 370,000 persons, was presented to Lord Milner expressing high appreciation of the services rendered by him in Africa to the crown and empire.

[edit] Businessman

Upon his return from South Africa, Viscount Milner occupied himself mainly with business interests in London, becoming chairman of the Rio Tinto Zinc mining company, though he remained active in the campaign for imperial free trade. In 1906 he became a director of the Joint Stock Bank, a precursor of the Midland Bank. In the period 1909 to 1911 he was a strong opponent of the budget of David Lloyd George and the subsequent attempt of the Liberal government to curb the powers of the House of Lords.

[edit] World War I

Since Milner, who was a leading conservative, was the only Briton who had experience in civil direction of a war, Lloyd George turned to him in December 1916 when he formed his national government. He was made a member of the five person War Cabinet. Milner was probably the most competent member of the war cabinet after the prime minister himself and consequently became Lloyd George’s fire fighter in many crises. He gradually became the second most powerful voice in the conduct of the war. Despite his conservative credentials he also gradually became disenchanted with the military leadership of the country which exercised a disproportionate influence on the conduct of war because of conservative support. He backed Lloyd George, who was even more disenchanted with the military, in his successful move to remove Edward Carson from the Admiralty,[5] and in his less successful attempt to prevent the disastrous Third Battle of Ypres in 1917.

Milner was also a chief author of the Balfour Declaration of 1917, although it was issued in the name of Arthur Balfour. He was a highly outspoken critic of the Austro-Hungarian war in Serbia arguing that « there is more widespread desolation being caused there (than) we have been familiar with in the case of Belgium ». He was an earnest advocate of inter-allied cooperation, attending an Allied conference in St. Petersburg in February 1917 and, as representative of the British cabinet, was on a March 1918 visit to France when the Germans launched their great offensive, and was instrumental in getting General Ferdinand Foch appointed as Allied Generalissimo on 26 March. On 19 April he was appointed Secretary of State for War and presided over the army council for the remainder of the war. Following the khaki election of December 1918, he was appointed Colonial Secretary and, in that capacity, attended the 1919 Paris Peace Conference where, on behalf of United Kingdom, he became one of the signatories of the Treaty of Versailles.

[edit] Post World War I: England and Egypt

After the War, Lord Milner assisted the Royal Agricultural Society in procuring Fordson tractors for the plowing and planting of grasslands, and communicated directly with Henry Ford by telegraph, per Henry Ford’s book, ‘My Life and Work’, regarding Chapter 14. His last great public service was, after serious rioting broke out, a mission to Egypt from December 1919 to March 1920 to make recommendations on British-Egyptian relations, specifically how to reconcile the British protectorate established in 1915 with Sa’d Zaghlul‘s calls for self-government. The report of the Milner Commission formed the basis of a settlement which lasted for a number of years.

[edit] Last years

Right until the end of his life, Lord Milner would call himself a « British race patriot » with grand dreams of a global Imperial parliament, headquartered in London, seating delegates of British descent from Canada, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa. He retired in February 1921 and was appointed a Knight of the Garter (KG) in the same month.[6] Later that year he married Lady Violet Georgina Gascoyne-Cecil, widow of Lord Edward Cecil and remained active in the work of the Rhodes Trust, while accepting, at the behest of Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin, the chairmanship of a committee to examine a new imperial preference tariff. His work, however, proved abortive when, following an election, Ramsay MacDonald assumed the office of Prime Minister in January 1924.

Seven weeks past his 71st birthday, Alfred Milner died at Sturry Court, near Canterbury of sleeping sickness, soon after returning from South Africa. His viscountcy, lacking heirs, died with him.

[edit] Credo

Found among Milner’s papers was his Credo, which was soon published to great acclaim— »I am a Nationalist and not a cosmopolitan …. I am a British (indeed primarily an English) Nationalist. If I am also an Imperialist, it is because the destiny of the English race, owing to its insular position and long supremacy at sea, has been to strike roots in different parts of the world. I am an Imperialist and not a Little Englander because I am a British Race Patriot … The British State must follow the race, must comprehend it, wherever it settles in appreciable numbers as an independent community. If the swarms constantly being thrown off by the parent hive are lost to the State, the State is irreparably weakened. We cannot afford to part with so much of our best blood. We have already parted with much of it, to form the millions of another separate but fortunately friendly State. We cannot suffer a repetition of the process. » [7]

[edit] Notes

  1. ^ New College Bulletin, November 2008
  2. ^
  3. ^ London Gazette: no. 27318, p. 3634, 28 May 1901.
  4. ^ London Gazette: no. 27455, p. 4586, 18 July 1902.
  5. ^ Hunt, p. 70
  6. ^ London Gazette: no. 32232, p. 1367, 18 February 1921.
  7. ^ The Times, 25 July 1925

[edit] References

  • Ascherson, Neal. « The War That Made South Africa », New York Review of Books, 6 December 1979, p. 12.
  • Iwan-Müller, E. B. Lord Milner and South Africa (London, 1902)
  • Worsfold, W. B. Lord Milner’s Work in South Africa (London, 1906)
  • Stead, W. T., « Sir Alfred Milner » in The Review of Reviews, vol. xx. (1899).
  • Milner, Alfred. « Serbia’s heartrending tragedy »
  • Davie, Lucille. Constitution Hill:Thomas Pakenham, the Boer War and the Old Fort (1 November 2004)
  • Hunt, Barry D. Sailor-Scholar. Wilfrid Laurier University Press (1982)
  • Marlowe, John Milner : apostle of Empire (Hamish Hamilton : London, 1976)
  • O’Brien, Terence Milner (Constable : London, 1979)
  • Cecil, Hugh & Mirabel Imperial marriage : an Edwardian war and peace (John Murray : London, 2002)
  •  This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed (1911). Encyclopædia Britannica (Eleventh ed.). Cambridge University Press.

[edit] External links

Wikimedia Commons has media related to: Alfred Milner, 1st Viscount Milner
Wikisource has original works written by or about: Alfred Milner

The Modern History Project ANTI-NWO

Posted in .... ATERMONDE ......, .....HISTOIRE...., archives, FRANC MACONNERIE BILDERBERG TRILATERALE ..., géopolitique, INVESTIGATIONS, LIVRES BOOKS, scandales, sociologie with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on avril 16, 2011 by rodolphepilaert63

The True Story of 9/11 by Stanley Monteith (2006, 5 parts)Using the attacks of 2001-09-11 as a pretext for global conflict Brotherhood of Darkness by Stanley Monteith (2000, 4 parts)Secret societies and the Luciferian conspiracy (condensed edition) The Demonic Roots of Globalism by Gary Kah (1995, 6 parts)Occult societies, the New Age movement, and the New World Order (condensed edition) Final Warning: A History of the New World Order by David Rivera (1994, 36 parts)Illuminism and the master plan for world domination George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography by Webster Tarpley & Anton Chaitkin (1991, 39 parts)The rise of the Bush dynasty and the political career of George H.W. Bush America’s Secret Establishment by Antony C. Sutton (1986, 9 parts)An Introduction to The Order of Skull and Bones (condensed editon) Fire In the Minds of Men by David Chilton (1984, 3 parts)Synopis of the book by J.H. Billington documenting the history of Illuminist revolutions The World Order by Eustace Mullins (1984, 14 parts)The history and practices of the parasitic financial elite Secrets of the Federal Reserve by Eustace Mullins (1983, 18 parts)The history, organization and controlling interests behind the Federal Reserve Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler by Antony C. Sutton (1976, 14 parts)How western capitalists funded Hitler and National SocialismWall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution by Antony C. Sutton (1974, 12 parts)How western capitalists funded Lenin, the Bolsheviks, and the Soviet Union None Dare Call it Conspiracy by Gary Allen and Larry Abraham (1971, 11 parts)The plan of the international bankers to create a world socialist super-state The Invisible Government by Dan Smoot (1962, 15 parts)The Council on Foreign Relations and the plans for a one-world Socialist dictatorship


New World Order (NWO)

History of New World Order
from 1773 to 1998

Part I – from 1773 to 1975

1773 –
Mayer Amschel Rothschild
twelve of his most influential friends and convinces them that if they all
pool their resources together, they can rule the world. This meeting takes
place in Frankfurt, Germany. Rothschild also informs his friends that he
has found the perfect candidate, an individual of incredible intellect and
ingenuity, to lead the organization he has planned – Adam Weishaupt.

May 1, 1776 – Adam Weishaupt (code named Spartacus)
establishes a secret society called the Order of the Illuminati.
Weishaupt is the Professor of Canon Law at the University of Ingolstadt in
Bavaria, part of Germany. [This date, May Day, is to become highly
significant to the Soviet Communists. They held festive military parades
on this day.] The Illuminati seek to establish a New World Order.

objectives are as follows:

Abolition of all ordered governments

2)   Abolition of private property

3)   Abolition of inheritance

4)   Abolition of patriotism

5)   Abolition of the family

6)   Abolition of religion

7)   Creation of a world government

1782 –
The Order of the Illuminati joins forces with
at the Congress of Wilhelmsbad. The Comte de Virieu,
an attendee at the conference, comes away visibly shaken. When questioned
about the « tragic secrets » he brought back with him, he replies: « I will
not confide them to you. I can only tell you that all this is very much
more serious than you think. » From this time on, according to his
biographer, « the Comte de Virieu could only speak of Freemasonry with
horror. »

1785 – An Illuminati courier named Lanze is struck by
lightning and killed while traveling by horseback through the town of
Ratisbon. When Bavarian officials examine the contents of his saddle bags,
they discover the existence of the Order of the Illuminati and find
plans detailing the coming French Revolution. The Bavarian government
attempts to alert the government of France of impending disaster, but the
French government fails to heed this warning. Bavarian officials arrest
all members of the Illuminati they can find, but Weishaupt and
others have gone underground and cannot be found.

Oct. 11, 1785 – Bavarian authorities raid the home of an
member named Von Zwack. They discover Illuminati
documents which show quite clearly that they plan to bring about a
« universal revolution that should deal the death-blow to society… this
revolution will be the work of the secret societies, and that is one of
our great mysteries. »

1789 – Violence erupts in France. The French Revolution not
only overthrows the existing government but also attempts to eliminate
Christianity from the nation. A half-naked prostitute is placed on the
altar of the Cathedral of Notre Dame and extolled as the « Goddess of
. » Revolutionary officials even do away with the seven-day week
and replace it with a ten-day week.

1796 – Freemasonry becomes a major issue in the Presidential
election in the United States. John Adams wins the election by
opposing Masonry, and his son John Quincy Adams warns of the dire
threat to the nation posed by the Masonic Lodges:

« I do
conscientiously and sincerely believe that the Order of Freemasonry,
if not the greatest, is one of the greatest moral and political evils
under which the Union is now laboring. »

1797 –
John Robison, Professor of Natural History at Edinburgh University
in Scotland, publishes a book entitled « Proofs of a Conspiracy » in which
he reveals that Adam Weishaupt had attempted to recruit him. He
exposes the diabolical aims of the Illuminati to the world.

1798 – George Washington acknowledges that Illuminati
activity has come to America:

« It is
not my intention to doubt that the doctrine of the Illuminati and
the principles of Jacobinism had not spread in the United States.
On the contrary, no one is more satisfied of this fact than I am. »

1816 –
Congress grants a 20-year charter to the Bank of the United States,
a private central bank for this country.

Constitution had granted to Congress the « power to coin money and regulate
the value thereof. » Thomas Jefferson had specifically warned the
American people against turning this power to create money over to a
private group that was unelected and not accountable to the public:

« If the
American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their
currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and
corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of
all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent
their fathers conquered. »]

1821 –
Georg W. F. Hegel formulates what is called the Hegelian dialectic
– the process by which Illuminati objectives are achieved.
According to the Hegelian dialectic, thesis plus antithesis equals
synthesis. In other words, first you foment a crisis. Then there is an
enormous public outcry that something must be done about the problem. So
you offer a solution that brings about the changes you really wanted all
along, but which people would have been unwilling to accept initially.

1826 – William Morgan attempts to publish a book exposing
the wrongdoing of the Masonic Lodges. While he is in the process of
having his book printed, he mysteriously disappears. [His body was found
in Lake Ontario a year later.]

1828 –
Mayer Amschel Rothschild
, who finances the Illuminati,
expresses his utter contempt for national governments which attempt to
regulate international bankers such as him:

« Allow me
to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who writes
the laws. »

[As Sir
Josiah Stamp, president of the Bank of England in the 1920s, would
remark years later:

« Banking
was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin. The bankers own the
; take it away from them but leave them the power to create
deposits, and with a flick of a pen they will create enough deposits to
buy it back again. »]

1829 –
British Illuminist Frances « Fanny » Wright gives a series of
lectures in the United States. She announces that various subversives and
revolutionaries are to be united in a movement that will be called « Communism. »
She explains that the movement is to be made more acceptable to the public
by professing to support « equal opportunity » and « equal rights. »

1829-1837 – While President Andrew Jackson is in office,
there are attempts to continue and strengthen the hold of a central bank
over the United States. President Jackson vigorously opposes these
efforts. Jackson tells his adversaries:

« You are
a den of vipers! I intend to rout you out, and by the Eternal God I will
rout you out. If the people only understood the rank injustice of our
money and banking system, there would be a revolution before morning. »

In 1832,
Jackson vetoes a bill to renew the charter of the Bank of the United
. In 1833, he removes government funds from the Bank of the
United States

1848 – Moses Mordecai Marx Levy, alias Karl Marx,
writes « The Communist Manifesto. » Marx is a member of an

Illuminatifront organization called the League of the Just. He
not only advocates economic and political changes; he advocates moral and
spiritual changes as well. He believes the family should be abolished and
that all children should be raised by a central authority. He expresses
his attitude toward God by saying:

« We must
war against all prevailing ideas of religion, of the state, of country,
of patriotism. The idea of God is the keynote of a perverted
civilization. It must be destroyed. »

Jan. 22,
1870 –
In a letter to Italian revolutionary leader Giuseppe Mazzini,
Albert Pike – Sovereign Grand Commander of the Southern
Jurisdiction of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry – announces the
establishment of a secret society within a secret society:

« We must
allow all of the federations to continue just as they are, with their
systems, their central authorities and their diverse modes of
correspondence between high grades of the same rite, organized as they
are at present, but we must create a super rite, which will remain
unknown, to which we will call those Masons of high degree of
whom we shall select. With regard to our brothers in Masonry, these men
must be pledges to the strictest secrecy. Through this supreme rite, we
will govern all Freemasonry which will become the one
international center, the more powerful because its direction will be
unknown. »

ultra-secret organization is called The New and Reformed Paladian Rite.

1870 – John Ruskin is named Professor of Fine Arts at Oxford
University in England. He teaches his students that the government should
take control of all means of production and distribution, and he is
prepared to place control of the government in the hands of a single man:

« My
continual aim has been to show the eternal superiority of some men to
others, sometimes even of one man to all others. »

1871 –
Albert Pike
publishes his 861-page book « Morals and Dogma« ,
intended only for Masonic eyes. He indicates that those in the lower ranks
of Masonry are deliberately deceived by their superiors:

« The
Blue degrees
[the first three degrees of the 32] are but the outer
court or portico of the Temple. Part of the symbols are displayed there
to the Initiate, but he is intentionally misled by false
interpretations. It is not intended that he shall understand them; but
it is intended that he shall imagine that he shall understand them.
Their true explication is reserved for the Adepts, the Princes of
. »

[This is
why about 95% of the men involved in Masonry don’t have a clue as to what
the objectives of the organization actually are. They are under the
delusion that it’s just a fine community organization doing good works.]

1875 – Russian occultist Helena Petrovna Blavatsky founds
the Theosophical Society. Madame Blavatsky claims that Tibetan holy men in
the Himalayas, whom she refers to as the Masters of Wisdom,
communicated with her in London by telepathy. She insists that the
Christians have it all backwards – that Satan is good and God is evil.

She writes:

« The
Christians and scientists must be made to respect their Indian betters.
The Wisdom of India, her philosophy and achievement, must be made known
in Europe and America. »

1884 –
The Fabian Society is founded to promote Socialism. The

Fabian Societytakes its name from the Roman General Fabius Maximus,
who fought Hannibal’s army in small debilitating skirmishes, rather than
attempting one decisive battle.

July 14, 1889 – Albert Pike issues instructions to the 23 Supreme
Councils of the world. He reveals who is the true object of Masonic

« To you,
Sovereign Grand Instructors General, we say this, that you may repeat it
to the Brethren of the 32nd, 31st and 30th degrees: The Masonic religion
should be, by all of us initiates of the high degrees, maintained in the
purity of the Luciferian doctrine. »

1890-1896 – Cecil Rhodes
, an enthusiastic student of John Ruskin,
is Prime Minister of South Africa, a British colony at the time. He is
able to exploit and control the gold and diamond wealth of South Africa.
He works to bring all the habitable portions of the world under the
domination of a ruling elite. To that end, he uses a portion of his vast
wealth to establish the famous Rhodes Scholarships.

Feb. 5, 1891 – Rhodes joins his group from Oxford with a similar
group from Cambridge headed by ardent social reformer William Stead.
Rhodes and Stead are members of the inner « Circle of Initiates » of
the secret society which they found. There is also an outer circle known
as the « Association of Helpers. »

1891 – Madame Blavatsky dies. The mantle of leadership for the
worldwide theosophical movement falls to Annie Besant, a militant feminist
and a member of the Fabian Socialist Society of England. She
enthusiastically joins in revolutionary street riots and pens numerous
volumes of occultic writings to add to those of Blavatsky.

1893 – The Theosophical Society sponsors a Parliament of World
Religions held in Chicago. The purpose of the convention is to introduce
Hindu and Buddhist concepts, such as belief in reincarnation, to the West.

1909-1913 – Lord Alfred Milner organizes the « Association
of Helpers
 » into various Round Table Groups in the British
dependencies and the United States.

1911 – The Socialist Party of Great Britain publishes a pamphlet
entitled « Socialism and Religion » in which they clearly state their
position on Christianity:

« It is
therefore a profound truth that Socialism is the natural enemy of
religion. A Christian Socialist is in fact an anti-Socialist.
Christianity is the antithesis of Socialism
. »

1912 –
Colonel Edward M. House, a close advisor of President
Woodrow Wilson
, publishes Phillip Dru: Administrator, in which
he promotes « socialism as dreamed of by Karl Marx. »

Feb. 3, 1913 – The 16th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, making
it possible for the Federal government to impose a progressive
income tax
, is ratified. Plank #2 of « The Communist Manifesto »
had called for a progressive income tax.

[In 1948,
the median American family paid 2% of its annual income in Federal income
tax; now it’s almost 25%.]

1913 – President Woodrow Wilson publishes « The New Freedom »
in which he reveals:

« Since I
entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me
privately. Some of the biggest men in the U.S., in the field of commerce
and manufacturing, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They
know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so
watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had
better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of
it. »

Dec. 23,
1913 –

Federal Reserve [neither
federal nor a reserve – it’s a privately owned institution] is
created. It was planned at a secret meeting in 1910 on Jekyl Island,
Georgia, by a group of bankers and politicians, including Col. House. This
transfers the power to create money from the American government to a
private group of bankers. The Federal Reserve Act is hastily passed
just before the Christmas break. Plank #5 of « The Communist Manifesto »
had called for just such a central bank. [It is probably the largest
generator of debt in the world.]

Charles A. Lindbergh Sr
. (father of the famed aviator) warns:

« This act
establishes the most gigantic trust on earth. When the President signs
this act the invisible government by the money power, proven to
exist by the Money Trust investigation, will be legalized. The money
power overawes the legislative and executive forces of the Nation and of
the States. I have seen these forces exerted during the different stages
of this bill. »

1916 –
Three years after signing the Federal Reserve Act into law,
President Woodrow Wilson observes:

« I am a
most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great
industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of
credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our
activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the
worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated
governments in the civilized world. No longer a government by free
opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the
majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of
dominant men. »

1916 –
Italian Socialist Antonio Gramsci states:

« Socialism is precisely the religion that must overwhelm Christianity.
Socialism is religion in the sense that it too is a faith with its
mystics and rituals; religion, because it has substituted for the
consciousness of the transcendental God of the Christians, the faith in
man and in his great strengths as a unique spiritual reality. »

1917 –
With aid from financiers in New York City and London, V. I. Lenin
is able to overthrow the government of Russia. Lenin later comments
on the apparent contradiction of the links between prominent capitalists
and Communism:

« There
also exists another alliance – at first glance a strange one, a
surprising one – but if you think about it, in fact, one which is well
grounded and easy to understand. This is the alliance between our
Communist leaders and your capitalists
. »

the Hegelian dialectic?]

May 30, 1919 – Prominent British and American personalities
establish the Royal Institute of International Affairs in England
and the Institute of International Affairs in the U.S. at a meeting
arranged by Col. House; attended by various Fabian socialists, including
noted economist John Maynard Keynes.

1920 – Britain’s Winston Churchill recognizes the connection
between the Illuminati and the Bolshevik Revolution in
Russia. He observes:

« From the
days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, to those of Trotsky,
Bela Kun, Rosa Luxembourg, and Emma Goldman, this world wide conspiracy
for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society
on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence and
impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played a definitely
recognizable role in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has
been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the nineteenth
century, and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from
the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped
the Russian people by the hair of their heads, and have become
practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire. »

1920-1931 – Louis T. McFadden
is Chairman of the House Committee on
Banking and Currency
. Concerning the Federal Reserve,
Congressman McFadden notes:

« When the
Federal Reserve Act was passed, the people of these United States
did not perceive that a world banking system was being set up here. A
super-state controlled by international bankers and international
industrialists acting together to enslave the world for their own
pleasure. Every effort has been made by the Fed to conceal its
powers but the truth is – the Fed has usurped the Government. It
controls everything here and it controls all our foreign relations. It
makes and breaks governments at will. »

the Great Depression and the country’s acceptance of FDR’s New Deal,
he asserts:

« It was
no accident. It was a carefully contrived occurrence. The international
bankers sought to bring about a condition of despair here so they might
emerge as the rulers of us all. »

1921 –
Col. House
reorganizes the American branch of the Institute of
International Affairs
into the

Council on Foreign Relations

[For the
past 60 years, 80% of the top positions in every administration – whether
Democrat or Republican – have been occupied by members of this
organization. During that time, only two Presidents have not been directly
affiliated with the CFR – John Kennedy and Ronald Reagan. Kennedy
was assassinated and an attempt was made on Reagan’s life!]

December 15, 1922 – The CFR endorses World Government
in its magazine « Foreign Affairs. » Author Philip Kerr states:

« Obviously there is going to be no peace or prosperity for mankind as
long as the earth remains divided into 50 or 60 independent states,
until some kind of international system is created. The real problem
today is that of world government. »

1928 –
« The Open Conspiracy: Blue Prints for a World Revolution » by H.
G. Wells
is published. A former Fabian socialist, Wells writes:

« The
political world of the Open Conspiracy must weaken, efface, incorporate
and supersede existing governments. The Open Conspiracy is the
natural inheritor of socialist and communist enthusiasms; it may be in
control of Moscow before it is in control of New York. The character of
the Open Conspiracy will now be plainly displayed. It will be a
world religion. »

1932 –
New books are published urging world order:

« Toward
Soviet America
, » by William Z. Foster. Head of the Communist
Party USA, Foster indicates that a National Department of
would be one of the means used to develop a new socialist
society in the U.S.

« The New World Order, » by F. S. Marvin, describing the
League of Nations as the first attempt at a New World Order.
Marvin says,  » nationality must rank below the claims of mankind as a
whole. »

« Dare the School Build a New Social Order? » is published.
Educator-author George Counts asserts that,

« the
should deliberately reach for power and then make the
most of their conquest » in order to « influence the social attitudes,
ideals and behavior of the coming generation. The growth of science
and technology has carried us into a new age where ignorance
must be replaced by knowledge, competition by cooperation, trust in
Providence by careful planning and private capitalism by some form of
social economy. »

1932 –
« Plan for Peace » by American Birth Control League founder Margaret
Sanger is published. She calls for coercive sterilization, mandatory
segregation, and rehabilitative concentration camps for all « dysgenic
stocks, » including Blacks, Hispanics, American Indians and Catholics. [The
American Birth Control League eventually becomes Planned Parenthood – the
nation’s foremost promoter and provider of abortion services. Many today
are not aware of the racist origins of Planned Parenthood.]

1933 – The first « Humanist Manifesto » is published.
Co-author John Dewey, the noted philosopher and educator, calls for
a synthesizing of all religions and « a socialized and cooperative economic
order. » Co-signer C. F. Potter said in 1930,

« Education is thus a most powerful ally of humanism, and every American
public school is a school of humanism. What can the theistic Sunday
schools, meeting for an hour once a week, teaching only a fraction of
the children, do to stem the tide of a five-day program of humanistic
teaching? »

1933 –
Shape of Things to Come
 » by
H. G. Wells is published. Wells predicts a second world war around
1940, originating from a German-Polish dispute. After 1945 there would be
an increasing lack of public safety in « criminally infected » areas. The
plan for the « Modern World State » would succeed on its third
attempt, and come out of something that occurred in Basra, Iraq.
The book also states:

« Although
world government had been plainly coming for some years, although
it had been endlessly feared and murmured against, it found no
opposition anywhere. »

Nov. 21,
1933 –
In a letter to Col. Edward M. House, President

Franklin Rooseveltwrites:

« The real
truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in
the larger centers has owned the government since the days of Andrew
Jackson. »

1934 –
« The Externalization of the Hierarchy » by Alice Bailey is
published. Bailey is an occultist, taking over from Annie Besant as head
of the Theosophical Society. Bailey’s works are channeled from a
spirit guide, the Tibetan Master [demon spirit] Djwahl Kuhl. [Her
teachings form the foundation for the current New Age movement.]

She writes:

« The hour
for the ancient mysteries has arrived. These Ancient Mysteries
were hidden in numbers, in ritual, in words, and in symbology; these
veil the secret. There is no question therefore that the work to be done
in familiarizing the general public with the nature of the Mysteries
is of paramount importance at this time. These Mysteries will be
restored to outer expression through the medium of the Church and the
Masonic Fraternity. » She further states: « Out of the spoliation of all
existing culture and civilization, the new world order must be
built. »

[The book
is published by the

Lucis Trust
, incorporated originally
in New York as the Lucifer Publishing Company. Lucis Trust
is a United Nations NGO (Non-Governmental Organization) and has
been a major player at the recent UN summits. Later, Assistant
Secretary General of the U.N. Robert Muller would credit the creation of
his World Core Curriculum for education to the underlying teachings
of Djwahl Kuhl, via Alice Bailey’s writings on the subject.]

1937 – Students at the Lenin School of Political Warfare in
Moscow are taught:

« Today,
of course, we are not strong enough to attack. To win, we shall need the
element of surprise. The western world will have to be put to sleep. So
we shall begin by launching the most spectacular peace movement on
record. There shall be electrifying overtures and unheard of
concessions. The capitalist countries, stupid and decadent, will rejoice
to cooperate to their own destruction. They will leap at another chance
to be friends. As soon as their guard is down, we shall smash them with
our clenched fist. »

28, 1939 –
In an address by John Foster Dulles [later U.S.
Secretary of State], he proposes that America lead the transition to a new
order of less independent, semi-sovereign states bound together by a
league or federal union.

1939 – « New World Order » by H. G. Wells proposes a
« collectivist one-world state » or « new world order » comprised of
« socialist democracies. » He advocates « universal conscription for service »
and declares that « nationalist individualism is the world’s disease. » He

« The
manifest necessity for some collective world control to eliminate
warfare and the less generally admitted necessity for a collective
control of the economic and biological life of mankind, are aspects of
one and the same process. »

He proposes
that this be accomplished through « universal law » and « propaganda » (or

1940 – « The New World Order » is published by the Carnegie
Endowment for Peace
and contains a select list of references on
regional and world federation, together with some special plans for world
order after the war.

December 12, 1940 – In « The Congressional Record » an article
entitled « A New World Order » by John G. Alexander calls for
a world federation.

March 1942 – An article in « TIME » magazine chronicles
the Federal Council of Churches [which later becomes the

National Council of Churches, a part of the World Council of
] lending its weight to efforts to establish a global
authority. A meeting of the top officials of the council comes out in
favor of:

1)   a
world government of delegated powers

strong immediate limitations on national sovereignty

international control of all armies and navies

Representatives (375 of them) of 30-some denominations assert that « a new
order of economic life is both imminent and imperative » – a new order that
is sure to come either « through voluntary cooperation within the framework
of democracy or through explosive revolution. »

1942 – The leftist Institute of Pacific Relations publishes « Post
War Worlds
 » by P. E. Corbett:

« World
government is the ultimate aim. It must be recognized that the law of
nations takes precedence over national law. The process will have to be
assisted by the deletion of the nationalistic material employed in
educational textbooks and its replacement by material explaining the
benefits of wiser association. »

June 28,
1945 –
President Truman endorses world government in a speech:

« It will
be just as easy for nations to get along in a republic of the world as
it is for us to get along in a republic of the United States. »

24, 1945 –
The United Nations Charter becomes effective. Also
on October 24, Senator Glen Taylor (D-Idaho) introduces Senate
Resolution 183, calling upon the U.S. Senate to go on record as favoring
creation of a world republic, including an international police force.

1946 – « The Teacher and World Government, » by former editor
of the « NEA Journal » (National Education Association) Joy Elmer
, is published. He says:

« In the
struggle to establish an adequate world government, the teacher can do
much to prepare the hearts and minds of children for global
understanding and cooperation. At the very heart of all the agencies
which will assure the coming of world government must stand the school,
the teacher, and the organized profession. »

1947 –
The American Education Fellowship calls for the « …establishment
of a genuine world order, an order in which national sovereignty is
subordinate to world authority. »

July 1948 – Sir Harold Butler, in the CFR’s « Foreign
Affairs, » sees « a New World Order » taking shape:

« How far
can the life of nations, which for centuries have thought of themselves
as distinct and unique, be merged with the life of other nations? How
far are they prepared to sacrifice a part of their sovereignty without
which there can be no effective economic or political union? »

1948 –
The preliminary draft of a « World Constitution » is published by
U.S. educators, advocating regional federation on the way toward world
federation. It provides for a « World Council » with a « Chamber of
 » to enforce world law, as well as a call for nations to
surrender their arms to the world government, and the right of this « Federal
Republic of the World
 » to seize private property for its use.

Feb. 7, 1950 – International financier and CFR member
James Warburg
tells a Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee:

« We shall
have world government whether or not you like it – by conquest or
consent. »

Feb. 9,
1950 –
The Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee introduces Senate
Concurrent Resolution #66 which begins:

« Whereas,
in order to achieve universal peace and justice, the present Charter
of the United Nations
should be changed to provide a true world
government constitution. »

resolution is introduced by Senator Glen Taylor (D-Idaho), who
later states:

« We would
have to sacrifice considerable sovereignty to the world organization to
enable them to levy taxes in their own right to support themselves. »

12, 1952 –
CFR member John Foster Dulles [who
later became Secretary of State] begins to perpetuate a giant lie. In
speaking before the American Bar Association in Louisville, Kentucky, he

« Treaty
law can override the Constitution. Treaties can take powers away from
Congress and give them to the President. They can take powers from the
States and give them to the Federal Government or to some international
body, and they can cut across the rights given to the people by their
constitutional Bill of Rights. »

1952 –
The World Association of Parliamentarians for World Government
draws up a map designed to illustrate how foreign troops would occupy and
police the six regions into which the

United States and Canada will be divided

as part of their world government plan.

1953 – Rowan Gaither, President of the Ford Foundation, tells a
Congressional commission investigating tax-exempt foundations:

« We at
the executive level here were active in either the OSS
[forerunner of the CIA], the State Department, or the European
Economic Administration. During those times, and without exception, we
operated under directives issued by the White House. We are
continuing to be guided by just such directives, the substance of which
were to the effect that we should make every effort to so alter life in
the United States as to make possible a comfortable merger with the
Soviet Union. »

Feb. 23,
1954 – Senator William Jenner
of Indiana says before the U.S. Senate:

« Today
the path to total dictatorship in the United States can be laid by
strictly legal means, unseen and unheard by Congress, the President, or
the people. We have a well-organized political action group in this
country, determined to destroy our Constitution and establish a
one-party state. It has a foothold within our Government, and its own
propaganda apparatus. One may call this group by many names. Some people
call it socialism, some collectivism. I prefer to call it ’democratic
.’ The important point to remember about this group is not
its ideology but its organization. It is a dynamic, aggressive, elite
corps, forcing its way through every opening, to make a breach for a
collectivist one-party state. It operates secretly, silently,
continuously to transform our Government without our suspecting the
change is underway. This secret revolutionary corps understands well the
power to influence the people by an elegant form of brainwashing. We see
this, for example, in the innocent use of words like ’democracy’ in
place of ’representative government.’  »

1954 –

Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands

the Bilderbergers
, international
politicians and bankers who meet secretly on an annual basis.

1959 – Norman Thomas, who six times was the candidate of the
Socialist Party for President of the United States, observes:

« The
American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism, but under the name
Liberalism they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program until
America will one day be a Socialist nation without knowing how it
happened. »

1959 –
Nikita Khrushchev,
ruthless dictator of the Soviet Union, states:

« We can’t
expect the American people to jump from Capitalism to

Communism, but we can assist their elected leaders in giving them
small doses of Socialism until they awaken one day to find they have
Communism. »

Nov. 25,
1959 –
Council on Foreign Relations Study Number 7 calls for a,

« …new
international order which must be responsive to world aspirations for
peace, for social and economic change…an international
order…including states labeling themselves as ’socialist’
[communist]. »

1959 –
The World Constitution and Parliament Association is founded, which
develops a « Diagram of World Government Under the Constitution for the
Federation of Earth. »

1959 – « The Mid-Century Challenge to U.S. Foreign Policy » is
published, sponsored by the Rockefeller Brothers’ Fund. It explains
that the U.S.

« cannot
escape, and indeed should welcome… the task which history has imposed
upon us. This is the task of helping to shape a new world order
in all its dimensions – spiritual, economic, political, social. »

1961 –
The U.S. State Department issues Document 7277, entitled « Freedom
From War: The U.S. Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a
Peaceful World
. » It details a three-stage plan to disarm all nations
and arm the U.N. with the final stage in which « no state would have
the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened U.N.
Peace Force
. »

1962 – A study entitled « A World Effectively Controlled by the
United Nations
 » is published, in which CFR member Lincoln

« …if
the Communist dynamic was greatly abated, the West might lose whatever
incentive it has for world government. »

1962 –
« The Future of Federalism » by Nelson Rockefeller claims
that current events compellingly demand a « new world order. » He
says there is:

« A fever
of nationalism… but the nation-state is becoming less and less
competent to perform its international political tasks… These are some
of the reasons pressing us to lead vigorously toward the true building
of a new world order… Sooner perhaps than we may realize…
there will evolve the bases for a federal structure of the free world. »

Nov. 13,
1963 –
It is alleged that just ten days prior to his assassination,
President John F. Kennedy tells a Columbia University audience:

« The high
office of President has been used to foment a plot to destroy the
Americans’ freedom, and before I leave office I must inform the citizens
of this plight. »

1964 – Harold Drummon
, former President of the Association for
Supervision and Curriculum Development, writes in the magazine
« Educational Leadership »: « The basic goal of education is change – human
change. »

1966 – Professor Carroll Quigley, Bill Clinton’s mentor at
Georgetown University, authors a massive volume entitled « Tragedy and
 » in which he states:

« There
does exist and has existed for a generation, an international network
which operates, to some extent, in the way the radical right believes
the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify
as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with
the Communists, or any other groups, and frequently does so. I know of
the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty
years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to examine
its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of
its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of
its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a
few of its policies, but in general my chief difference of opinion is
that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is
significant enough to be known. »

1968 –
Joy Elmer Morgan
, former editor of the « NEA Journal, » publishes
« The American Citizen’s Handbook » in which he says:

« The
coming of the United Nations and the urgent necessity that it
evolve into a more comprehensive form of world government places upon
the citizens of the United States an increased obligation to make the
most of their citizenship which now widens into active world
citizenship. »

July 26,
1968 – Nelson Rockefeller
pledges that « as President, he would work
toward international creation of a new world order. »

1969 – A document entitled « Marriage and the Family » is
published by the British Humanist Association stating that,

« some
opponents of humanism have accused us of wishing to overthrow the
traditional Christian family. They are right. That is exactly what we
intend to do. »

1970 –
The U.S. Department of Defense appropriates funds [$2 million a year
for five years] for the « development of immune-system destroying agents
for biological warfare. »

[Source of
the HIV virus which causes AIDS. The virus was then
introduced into the homosexual community via hepatitis vaccine and into
Central Africa
via smallpox vaccine.]

1970 – Zbigniew Brzezinski [who later became President Jimmy
’s National Security Advisor] writes a book entitled « Between
Two Ages
. » He has nothing but praise for Marxism:

« Marxism
represents a further vital and creative stage in the maturing of man’s
universal vision… Marxism is simultaneously a victory of the external,
active man over the inner, passive man and a victory of reason over
belief… Marxism, disseminated on the popular level in the form
of communism, represents a major advance in man’s ability to
conceptualize his relationship to the world. »

He also
describes how war can be waged against a nation without its citizens even
realizing they are under attack:

« Technology will make available to the leaders of major nations a
variety of techniques for conducting secret warfare, of which only a
bare minimum of security forces need be appraised. One nation may attack
a competitor covertly… techniques of weather modification could
be employed to produce prolonged periods of drought or storm, thereby
weakening a nation’s capacity and forcing it to accept the demands of
the competitor. »

1972 –
President Nixon
visits China and toasts Chinese Premier Chou En-lai
by talking of « the hope that each of us has to build a new world
. »

April 1972 – In his keynote address to the Association for
Childhood Education International
, Chester M. Pierce, Professor
of Education and Psychiatry in the Faculty of Medicine at Harvard
University, proclaims:

« Every
child in America entering school at the age of five is insane because he
comes to school with certain allegiances toward our founding fathers,
toward his parents, toward a belief in a supernatural being. It’s up to
you, teachers, to make all of these sick children well by creating the
international child of the future. »

May 18,
1972 –
In speaking of the coming world government, Roy M. Ash,
Director of the Office of Management and Budget, declares that:

« …within two decades the institutional framework for a world economic
community will be in place… and aspects of individual sovereignty will
be given over to a supernational authority. »

1973 –
International banker and staunch member of the subversive

Council on Foreign Relations
, David
Rockefeller founds a new organization called the

Trilateral Commission
. He invites
future President Jimmy Carter to become one of the founding members.
Zbigniew Brzezinski is the organization’s first director.

1973 – « Humanist Manifesto II » is published:

« The next
century can be and should be the humanistic century… we stand at the
dawn of a new age… a secular society on a planetary scale…as
non-theists we begin with humans not God, nature not deity… we deplore
the division of humankind on nationalistic grounds… Thus we look to
the development of a system of world law and a world order based based
upon trans-national federal government… The true revolution is
occurring. »

1973 –
The Club of Rome, a U.N. operative, issues a report entitled
« Regionalized and Adaptive Model of the Global World System. » This
report divides the entire world into ten kingdoms.

Feb. 10, 1973 – Catherine Barrett, former president of the
National Education Association
, writes that,

« dramatic
changes in the way we will raise our children in the year 2000 are
indicated, particularly in terms of schooling. We will need to recognize
that the so-called ’basic skills,’ which currently represent nearly the
total effort in elementary schools, will be taught in one-quarter of the
present school day. When this happens – and it’s near – the teacher can
rise to his true calling. More than a dispenser of information, the
teacher will be a conveyor of values, a philosopher. We will be agents
of change. »

Aug. 10,
1973 – David Rockefeller
writes an article for the « New York Times »
describing his recent visit to Red China:

« Whatever
the price of the Chinese Revolution, it has obviously succeeded not only
in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also in
fostering high morale and community purpose. »

[Apparently, it matters very little to Mr. Rockefeller that the government
of Communist China has slaughtered 64 million human beings in the process
of consolidating its power and that it continues to brutally suppress all

April 1974 – Former U.S. Deputy Assistant Secretary of State,
and CFR member Richard Gardner’s article « The
Hard Road to World Order
 » is published in the CFR’s « Foreign Affairs, »
where he states that:

« …the ’house
of world order
’ will have to be built from the bottom up rather than
from the top down… but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding
it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned
frontal assault. »

1974 –
In a report entitled « New International Economic Order, » the
U.N. General Assembly
outlines a plan to redistribute the wealth from
the rich to the poor nations.

1975 – In Congress, 32 Senators and 92 Representatives sign « A
Declaration of Interdependence, » which states that,

« we must
join with others to bring forth a new world order… Narrow
notions of national sovereignty must not be permitted to curtail that
obligation. »

Congresswoman Marjorie Holt refuses to sign the Declaration saying:

« It calls
for the surrender of our national sovereignty to international
organizations. It declares that our economy should be regulated by
international authorities. It proposes that we enter a ’new world order’
that would redistribute the wealth created by the American people. »

1975 –
Retired Navy Admiral Chester Ward, former Judge Advocate General of
the U.S. Navy and former CFR member, writes in a critique that the
goal of the CFR is the,

« …submergence of U.S. sovereignty and national independence into an
all powerful one-world government… »

Nowheretorun BEST ANTI-THEOSOPHY videos

Posted in .... ATERMONDE ......, .....HISTOIRE...., FRANC MACONNERIE BILDERBERG TRILATERALE ..., INVESTIGATIONS, sociologie, THEOSOPHIE NEW AGE with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on avril 15, 2011 by rodolphepilaert63

Nowheretorun ANTI-THEOSOPHY videos

Posted in .... ATERMONDE ......, FRANC MACONNERIE BILDERBERG TRILATERALE ..., géopolitique, INVESTIGATIONS, sociologie, THEOSOPHIE NEW AGE with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on avril 15, 2011 by rodolphepilaert63

You can now download All of my videos prior to 1/10/10 in four torrents available at the following links:

In order to download a torrent you must first have a free torrent client like Utorrent

(1 of 4) Chris White Video Collection – Debunks

(2 of 4) Chris White Video Collection – Conspiracy and Misc.

(3 of 4) Chris White Video Collection – Apologetics and Christian

(4 of 4) Chris White Video Collection – Tracts and Spanish

Debunkumentaries Christian
Sacred Name Teachers – Debunked The NEW Gospel DVD Tract
Gregg Braden Debunked Muslim DVD Tract
2012 Debunked Mormon DVD Tract
Debunking Jordan Maxwell A Guide For New Christians
Straight Talk About Maitreya Foxe’s Book of Martyrs
The Arrivals & The Wake Up Project DEBUNKED Homosexual Tract
Clarification on The Arrivals & WUP DEBUNKED Who is Jesus, Does it Matter?
The 2012 Deception Presentation How did Jesus die for our sins?
UFO’s in Art Debunked Original Video Gospel Tract
UFO’s in Art Debunked 2 (eqypt) Hidden Message in Genesis. WOW!
Jordan Maxwell – Water of Grace, Water of Life C.S. Lewis – “Lord, Liar, or Lunatic”
Face and pyramids on mars debunked Russ Dizdar, Exorcism, MPD, SRA
Debunking The Protocols of the Elders of Zion Real Miracle Testimonies – Sandi’s Story
Michael Tsarion is Wrong -2009 Spiritual Warfare – Russ Dizdar
William Cooper Debunks Jordan Maxwell Real Miracle Testimonies – Marks Story
“The ‘Real’ Zeitgeist Challenge” DEBUNKED ALL of Them
Astrotheology Debunked Sermon Jam – Russ Dizdar – Sin, Grace, and Jesus
Zeitgeist addendum is NWO propaganda The First Word of the Gospel
The Many Mistakes of Michael Tsarion (Old 2007) Papua New Guinea – AMAZING Missionary Story
David Icke Debunked Former Catholic Testimonies


Posted in .... ATERMONDE ......, .....HISTOIRE...., ....DOCUMENTAIRES ....., FRANC MACONNERIE BILDERBERG TRILATERALE ..., géopolitique, INVESTIGATIONS, sociologie, THEOSOPHIE NEW AGE with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on avril 7, 2011 by rodolphepilaert63

Zeitgeist : un lien mondialiste …

07 April 2011 — 03:04 { Posts RSS } { Comments RSS }

Guerilla médiatique contre le Nouvel Ordre Mondial

Vous avez certainement entendu parler du mouvement Zeitgeist.

Infoguerilla reviendra de manière plus précise sur le sujet…

J.Fresco avec son ami M.Gorbatchev et la Reine Béatrice pour la Charte de la terre :



    Le rouge ballon

    ET donc ?

    QU’y a t il de compromettant ?

    N’y verra le mal que celui qui veut y voir.




    Pour remettre les choses un peu au clair, ce sont les hommes qui changeront la direction de notre monde, sauf si on laisse l’ONU et cie se charger du NWO. Les idées du projet venus ne sont pas mauvaises, il suffit juste que les « hommes » se réveillent et qu’ils ne laissent pas cette opportunité aux « forces maléfiques » qui ne feront que détourner le but premier de ces idées. Alors faites la différence, qui peut changer le monde? une poignée de manipulateurs qui se réunissent lors de conférences ou la masse populaire qui devrait se dépêcher de se réveiller? Ce que le mouvement zeitgeist dénonce est vrai, ce qu’il soutient est un grand pas pour une véritable humanité. Tout dépend qui mettra en place ce projet. Réveillez-vous!!



    Pas de problème Anonyme, nous sommes reveillé!



    pour moi :

    Zeitgeist (l’esprit du temps ) est le cheval de Troie qui vise à faire connaitre le projet Vénus (amour séduction beauté ), [ concevoir le futur ] ; et imposer le monde scientiste de la mouvance transhumaniste du NWO.

    La promotion de la transformation de la société actuelle vers un nouveau paradigme = l’économie basée sur les ressources.

    Des promesses pseudos humanistes, garantissant l’abolition de tout ce qui peut engendrer la douleur humaine ; travail, religions, maladies, pénuries diverses, toutes les sources de conflits et de frustrations, remplacées par le bonheur et le bien être, en harmonie avec la nature, elle même libérée de la contrainte humaine.

    Ceci est le miroir aux alouettes (de Vénus),d’un marketing qui sert le projet occulte, le plus atroce, qui n’est jamais été inventé.

    L’intelligence et le savoir de l’humanité, établis dans le réseau mondial, alimente la noosphère, le but étant d’atteindre le point de singularité (c’est pour bientôt. au fait, ELLAMY, nom de l’opération Britanique en Libye, a été choisi par un ordi.) ainsi, une nouvelle entité (qui est un condencé du tout), singulière, polymorphe, libre, indépendante, avec sa propre conceptualité de notre monde, à même de se mouvoir partout sur la planete, verra le jour.

    Actuellement, l’informatique quantique (ouverture sur l’outre-monde) fait des progrès exponentiels. La loi de Moore se fissure.

    Le couplage du biologique, avec la super puissance de l’informatique quantique, des nanotechs et de la noosphère, engendrera la disparition de l’individualité humaine, d’ou l’apparition d’un collectivisme intellectuel et corporel (de type colonie) ; chaque unité ayant sa propre caractéristique fonctionnelle et parametrable, selon les besoins inhérants à la structure d’ensemble, et toujours au service d’une élite.

    L’émergence de la base, des néo-post-humains, du groupe sheepeole, par toutes sortes d’évenements et de techniques de désorganisations et de déshumanisations du genre humain, participe à l’eugénisme de masse qui sert à concevoir ce nouveau monde.

    A partir de la matière biologique disponible, la plus saine génétiquement parlant, se fera le tri par la loi du plus fort, du plus résistant, et du plus intelligent, ect…

    Les posts humains ou H+ qui en résulteraient, pourraient également servir, entre autre, de matériel de régénération des élites conceptrices (caste à part qui se veut immortelle)

    Evidemment, les transhumanistes ont l’ambition de remplacer l’humain de base (qui est inutile, nuisible, consomateur de ressources) par des nanotechs : assembleurs réplicants capables de créer toutes structures/ désassembleur, l’outil inverse.


    Weishaupt et les autres avaient un rêve : une société transhumaniste, idéale, égalitaire, ou le genre humain raisonnable deviendrait une seule famille.

    Les hermetistes et les alchimistes ont un rêve : la matiere, toujours perfectible, a besoin d’être réorganisée, car laissée inachevée.

    alors : ceux qui arriveront à relever le défi, de parachever l’oeuvre du grand architecte seront son égal.


    Honni Soit Qui mal Y Pense

    La critique est aisée, l’art difficile.



    Bein par chez moi, il y a un adage qui raconte qu’il faut être bien plus proche de ses ennemis que de ses amis. Je ne doute pas de la sincérité du projet Venus, et je ne serais pas étonné que les relais officiels du NWO y voient une manière de noyauté ce projet pour le détourner.

    L’EBR est une forme de nouvel ordre mondial mais ne ce n’est pas LE nouvel ordre mondial qu’on ne sert matin midi et soir.

    D’autre part dans cette vidéo, il existe bien des manières d’interpréter les réponses de Roxanne. Vous y avez vu la vôtre, moi j’en vois d’autres. Dommage que dans vos questions vous n’avez pas appuyer là (ou vous pensez) que ça fait mal, car votre argumentation aurait eu beaucoup plus de poids.

    Jusqu’à preuve du contraire, LE nwo, est la centralisation des richesses aux mains d’une poignée d’individus avec un nouveau système monétaire. L’EBR, n’est pas ça.



    Zeitgeist est une escroquerie mondialiste luciférienne. Sans aller chercher bien loin le simple fait que cette série de documentaires soit techniquement de qualité professionnelle faisant usage de moyens dispendieux est un premier indice de quelque chose potentiellement suspect. Qui sont les gens derrière cela? D’où vient leur financement manifestement conséquent?

    Une des caractéristiques des lucifériens c’est de savoir noyer leur projet occulte dans un océan de bons sentiments si bien que seul les initiés sont capables de renifler la supercherie…

    Zeitgeist est un projet de propagande de très haut niveau au service de

    du nouvel ordre mondial luciférien.


    Did skovisch

    en réponse a Frank :

    « Sans aller chercher bien loin le simple fait que cette série de documentaires soit techniquement de qualité professionnelle faisant usage de moyens dispendieux est un premier indice de quelque chose potentiellement suspect. Qui sont les gens derrière cela? D’où vient leur financement manifestement conséquent? »

    Ou voyez vous les moyens surdimensionné?

    Vous auriez parlez de Yan Arthus Bertrand et ses centaines d’heures de voles en hélico ok, mais là, ne peut on pas parler d’un certain tallent graphique?

    Attention, aussi, à l’argumentum ad hominem qui nous éloigne du sujet lui même.

    Cela fait un certain temps que je cherche la petite bête. Mais très peu ne propose un commentaire construit sur l’argumentaire Zeitgeist (qui n’est pas le sien au passage mais qu’il a juste synthétisé). En effet on y retrouve des idées anarchistes, décroissantes, internationnalistes, scientifiques, techniques etc

    ne crachons pas, non plus sur le réel désire de changement des militants.

    J’ai télécharger le document en pdf que je suis en train de lire pour me faire mon idées.

    voici le lien :




    Il est facile de critiquer lorsqu’on ne maitrise pas le sujet ;-)

    Je vous signale tout de même au passage que cette vidéo est mal retranscrite, l’interprétation de Roxanne Meadow est mensongère !!!

    En effet, et en voici la preuve :

    Qu’est ce que le Projet Vénus ? voilà la réponse :




    Je maîtrise très bien le sujet niveau religion, et la première partie de Zeitgeist I est un tissu d’âneries, en voici un résumé:

    L’introduction de cette première partie de Zeitgeist est alléchante: on suppose que c’est la religion organisée (Vatican, Jésuites, Opus Dei, inquisition,…) qui va être attaquée et on est curieux de découvrir ce qui va être révélé. En fait on est déçu de réaliser que toute cette partie cible uniquement le « Dieu de la Bible » et « Jésus-Christ » comme étant les ennemis à abattre.

    Horus, Mithra et Jésus

    En résumé: pour les auteurs de Zeitgeist, Jésus n’a pas existé, c’est un personnage mythique, un clone des Dieux solaires des mythes de l’antiquité (Horus, Mithra, …)

    Même sans rentrer dans le détail on peut se rendre compte rapidement que les comparaisons sont très souvent fantaisistes et non fondées. Elles démontrent tout au plus une ignorance totale de l’histoire, de la mythologie égyptienne et de la Bible.

    Exemples: Zeitgeit affirme que « Horus serait né d’une vierge ». C’est complètement absurde. Dans la mythologie égyptienne Horus est le fils d’Isis et d’Osiris (avec des péripéties touchant son pénis perdu). Contrairement à ce qu’affirme Zeitgeist, le « dieu » égyptien Horus n’avait pas non plus 12 disciples, la naissance d’Horus n’a pas été annoncée par des anges, il n’est pas né dans une grotte (Jésus non plus d’ailleurs) mais dans un marais, il n’y avait pas non plus de bergers, Horus n’a pas marché sur l’eau (mais où les auteurs de Zeitgeist sont-ils allés imaginer ça!!?). Dans l’évangile rien ne dit le nombre de mages qui ont visité Jésus enfant (c’est une tradition tardive non biblique qui a introduit Gaspard, Balthazar, Melchior). Horus n’a pas été crucifié (aucune mention! On peut aussi remarquer que la croix est un supplice romain pas un supplice égyptien), Horus n’a pas été enterré dans une grotte, etc…

    Idem pour Mithra et les autres « dieux solaires » babyloniens, égyptiens, grecs, perses,…

    On se demande d’ailleurs bien pourquoi cette focalisation sur le christianisme et la Bible, rien qu’à ce niveau c’est déjà très louche.

    Bien à vous.

  11. Did skovisch

    Pour revenir sur l’eugénisme, cité en fin de vidéo, j’aimerai bien éclaircir le sujet.

    La définition de l’eugénisme peut être désigné comme « l’ensemble des méthodes et pratiques visant à transformer le patrimoine génétique de l’espèce humaine, dans le but de le faire tendre vers un idéal déterminé. » A ceci s’ajoutent les moyens pour, mais j’y reviendrai après…

    Nous parlons bien d’un « idéal déterminé ». Nous sommes donc dans une subjectivité exacerbée. Cette « idéal » peut être Mondialiste ou populaire ou autres…

    Donc pour l’instant, l’eugénisme dans sa simple expression, pourrai être « bien » ou/et « mal » (j’appuie le « ou/et » car je ne suis pas pour la bipolarité des opinions, pour/contre)

    Autrement dit pour l’instant l’eugénisme serait neutre lorsque aucun qualificatif et moyen ne s’y rapporte.

    Et les moyens dans tous ça?

    Souvent l’eugénisme est évoqué avec la perspective induite (souvent sous entendu et non exprimé) de moyens pour tendre vers l’objectif « d’idéal déterminé ».

    Le plus souvent, ces moyens sont représentés sous la forme de stérilisation des faibles, contrôle de l’immigration, malthusianisme (élimination des faibles par la pauvreté en vulgarisant à mort) dans le but précis d’établir les politiques volontaristes d’éradication des caractères jugés handicapants ou de favorisassions des caractères jugés bénéfiques.

    Reprenons le « but » : éradication des caractères jugés handicapants ou de favorisassions des caractères jugés bénéfiques. Nous nous trouvons, à nouveau, face à une subjectivité exacerbé.

    Car vous comprendrez qu’ »Handicapante » ou « bénéfique » dépendent du point de vue. (Réfléchir et penser est handicapant face a la volonté du pouvoir mais bénéfique pour le peuple ou autre…)

    En bref l’eugénisme n’est ni bon ni mauvais tant que la description des moyens et des buts n’ont pas été clairement exprimé. Cela remet en cause l’association (un peu trop raccourcis à mon gout) entre eugénisme mondialiste et eugénisme à la Zeitgeist vue dans cette vidéo.

    Maintenant revenons à l’eugénisme « Zeitgeist ». Le Projet Venus synthétise que le changement comportemental humain passera par les changements dans son environnement (économique, géographique, matériel, habitat…) En gros ce sont les méthodes et pratiques visant à transformer le patrimoine génétique de l’espèce humaine dans le but de le faire tendre vers un idéal déterminé au travers de l’éradication des caractères jugés handicapants ou de favorisassions des caractères jugés bénéfiques.

    Pourquoi est ce un mal de vouloir un certain eugénisme lorsque les moyens associés (précisément dans ce cas et seulement dans ce cas) sont ceux d’une éthique humanitaire favorable au plus grand nombre orienté vers la pensée autonome (anarchisme), mise à mal de la hiérarchie, changement de paradigme économique argumenté etc. En bref une modification de environnement pour « l’éradication des caractères jugés handicapants ou de favorisassions des caractères jugés bénéfiques ».

    C’est de l’eugénisme mais les moyens sont différent que ceux associé couramment par les pensées eugéniste mondialiste.

    Qu’en pensez vous ?



    @ledbusqueurdebombes ;-)

    @méditer ;-)

    «Toute vérité franchit trois étapes. D’abord elle est ridiculisée. Ensuite, elle subit une forte opposition. Puis, elle est considérée comme ayant toujours été une évidence.» [ Arthur Schopenhauer ]

    Enfin ! « Pour atteindre la vérité, il faut une fois dans la vie se défaire de toutes les opinions qu’on a reçues, et reconstruire de nouveau tout le système de ses connaissance. » [René Descartes]

    « Pour examiner la vérité, il est besoin, une fois dans sa vie, de mettre toutes choses en doute autant qu’il se peut. » [René Descartes]




    Bein là tu parles du film Zeitgeist, mais il ne fait pas partie intégrante du mouvement puisque c’est un essai personnel du réalisateur.

    La critique positive ou négative du mouvement ne peut se faire que par la documentation officielle et « zeitgeist addendum » ainsi que « moving forward ».

    Mais puisque tu évoques toutes ces incertitudes sur la religion, du premier film, il semblerait qu’il y ait des déclarations hautement discutables voir fausses.

    @ Franck

    Je pense que tu devrais regarder « who is peter joseph », tu auras des informations sur toutes les questions que tu te poses. Que d’ailleurs, tu ne manqueras pas d’aller vérifier :)


    Votre commentaire est en attente de modération



    Aquarius – The Age Of Evil – Keith « Truth » Thompson (Full)


    David Rothschild ADORE Zeitgeist films and movement are exposed and shown to have ties to the New Age, Theosophy, Freemasonry and the new world order movements.It covers Benjamin Creme, Maitreya, 2012 and the utopian New Age