Jean-Paul Bourré – Les sectes Lucifériennes aujourd’hui
What is the Hegelian Dialectic : FABIAN SOCIALISM
Hall the Secret Destiny of America ; Manly P Hall 1944
Lucis Trust(Lucifer Trust) puts out the book Externalization of the Hierarchy by Alice Bailey which spells out The Plan for the Satanists and New Agers on how the spiritual Hierarchy (actually the demonic hierarchy) is to externalize their rule of the planet. The book gives quite a few of the details of the plan, and is used as a textbook for New Agers at the Arcane Schools in NY, London, and Europe on how the New Age/One World Religion/One-World- Government will be brought in. If anyone doubts the Rockefeller’s commitment to Satan, read page 107 of Externalization of the Hierarchy. On page 107 Alice Bailey, President of the Theosophical Society and part of Lucis (formerly Lucifer) Trust, tells us who will rule when the New Age (New World Order) takes over. On the Earthly level–Humanity so to speak, the Ruler is given on page 107 as Lucifer. On the Spiritual level–called « Shamballa – the Holy City » the coming ruler is given as « the Lord of the World » which we Christians know as Satan. Lucis Trust knows it is Satan too, but for public consumption they say that the « ruler of the world » is Sanat (a scrambling of Satan) Kumara. They also predict there will be a Christ Consciousness and the Christ (actually the Anti5 Christ) The book Externalization of the Hierarchy teaches repeatedly (see pages 511-512, 514) that the 3 vehicles to bring in the New Age will be the Masonic Lodges, (obviously not everyone attends Lodges), next the Churches (this is clearly revealing to us that men like the Rockefellers are using the churches for the Luciferian plan of Lucis Trust), and finally Education (Well, of course education. Not everyone attends churches. They need a safety net to catch everyone in their brainwashing to make us all want to be happy slaves under the Light-bearer.) From Springmeier book:Bloodlines of the Illuminati The New Age Movement consists of an incredibly huge and well organized network consisting of thousands of groups, trusts, foundations, clubs, lodges, and religious groups whose goal and purpose is to prepare the world to enter the coming « Age Of Aquarius. » A small sampling of only a few of the organizations involved would include: Amnesty International, Zero Population Growth, California New Age Caucus, New World Alliance, World Goodwill, The Church Universal and Triumphant, The Theosophical Society, the Forum, Planetary Initiative for the World We Choose, the Club of Rome, Church Universal & Triumphant, Christian Science, and the Unity School of Christianity. This list, by no means all inclusive, demonstrates the diversity of organizations operating in economic, political, and religious spheres of influence
This article is reprinted from the Winter, 1992 issue of FIDELIO Magazine.
The people of North America and Western Europe now accept a level of ugliness in their daily lives which is almost without precedent in the history of Western civilization. Most of us have become so inured, that the death of millions from starvation and disease draws from us no more than a sigh, or a murmur of protest. Our own city streets, home to legions of the homeless, are ruled by Dope, Inc., the largest industry in the world, and on those streets Americans now murder each other at a rate not seen since the Dark Ages.
At the same time, a thousand smaller horrors are so commonplace as to go unnoticed. Our children spend as much time sitting in front of television sets as they do in school, watching with glee, scenes of torture and death which might have shocked an audience in the Roman Coliseum. Music is everywhere, almost unavoidable—but it does not uplift, nor even tranquilize—it claws at the ears, sometimes spitting out an obscenity. Our plastic arts are ugly, our architecture is ugly, our clothes are ugly. There have certainly been periods in history where mankind has lived through similar kinds of brutishness, but our time is crucially different. Our post-World War II era is the first in history in which these horrors are completely avoidable. Our time is the first to have the technology and resources to feed, house, educate, and humanely employ every person on earth, no matter what the growth of population. Yet, when shown the ideas and proven technologies that can solve the most horrendous problems, most people retreat into implacable passivity. We have become not only ugly, but impotent.
Nonetheless, there is no reason why our current moral-cultural situation had to lawfully or naturally turn out as it has; and there is no reason why this tyranny of ugliness should continue one instant longer.
Consider the situation just one hundred years ago, in the early 1890’s. In music, Claude Debussy was completing his Prelude to the Afternoon of a Faun, and Arnold Schönberg was beginning to experiment with atonalism; at the same time, Dvorak was working on his Ninth Symphony, while Brahms and Verdi still lived. Edvard Munch was showing The Scream, and Paul Gauguin his Self-Portrait with Halo, but in America, Thomas Eakins was still painting and teaching. Mechanists like Helmholtz and Mach held major university chairs of science, alongside the students of Riemann and Cantor. Pope Leo XIII’s De Rerum Novarum was being promulgated, even as sections of the Socialist Second International were turning terrorist, and preparing for class war.
The optimistic belief that one could compose music like Beethoven, paint like Rembrandt, study the universe like Plato and Nicolaus of Cusa, and change world society without violence, was alive in the 1890’s—admittedly, it was weak, and under siege, but it was hardly dead. Yet, within twenty short years, these Classical traditions of human civilization had been all but swept away, and the West had committed itself to a series of wars of inconceivable carnage.
What started about a hundred years ago, was what might be called a counter-Renaissance. The Renaissance of the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries was a religious celebration of the human soul and mankind’s potential for growth. Beauty in art could not be conceived of as anything less than the expression of the most-advanced scientific principles, as demonstrated by the geometry upon which Leonardo’s perspective and Brunelleschi’s great Dome of Florence Cathedral are based. The finest minds of the day turned their thoughts to the heavens and the mighty waters, and mapped the solar system and the route to the New World, planning great projects to turn the course of rivers for the betterment of mankind. About a hundred years ago, it was as though a long checklist had been drawn up, with all of the wonderful achievements of the Renaissance itemized—each to be reversed. As part of this « New Age » movement, as it was then called, the concept of the human soul was undermined by the most vociferous intellectual campaign in history; art was forcibly separated from science, and science itself was made the object of deep suspicion. Art was made ugly because, it was said, life had become ugly.
The cultural shift away from the Renaissance ideas that built the modern world, was due to a kind of freemasonry of ugliness. In the beginning, it was a formal political conspiracy to popularize theories that were specifically designed to weaken the soul of Judeo-Christian civilization in such a way as to make people believe that creativity was not possible, that adherence to universal truth was evidence of authoritarianism, and that reason itself was suspect. This conspiracy was decisive in planning and developing, as means of social manipulation, the vast new sister industries of radio, television, film, recorded music, advertising, and public opinion polling. The pervasive psychological hold of the media was purposely fostered to create the passivity and pessimism which afflict our populations today. So successful was this conspiracy, that it has become embedded in our culture; it no longer needs to be a « conspiracy, » for it has taken on a life of its own. Its successes are not debatable—you need only turn on the radio or television. Even the nomination of a Supreme Court Justice is deformed into an erotic soap opera, with the audience rooting from the sidelines for their favorite character.
Our universities, the cradle of our technological and intellectual future, have become overwhelmed by Comintern-style New Age « Political Correctness. » With the collapse of the Soviet Union, our campuses now represent the largest concentration of Marxist dogma in the world. The irrational adolescent outbursts of the 1960’s have become institutionalized into a « permanent revolution. » Our professors glance over their shoulders, hoping the current mode will blow over before a student’s denunciation obliterates a life’s work; some audio-tape their lectures, fearing accusations of « insensitivity » by some enraged « Red Guard. » Students at the University of Virginia recently petitioned successfully to drop the requirement to read Homer, Chaucer, and other DEMS (« Dead European Males ») because such writings are considered ethnocentric, phallocentric, and generally inferior to the « more relevant » Third World, female, or homosexual authors.
This is not the academy of a republic; this is Hitler’s Gestapo and Stalin’s NKVD rooting out « deviationists, » and banning books—the only thing missing is the public bonfire.
We will have to face the fact that the ugliness we see around us has been consciously fostered and organized in such a way, that a majority of the population is losing the cognitive ability to transmit to the next generation, the ideas and methods upon which our civilization was built. The loss of that ability is the primary indicator of a Dark Age. And, a new Dark Age is exactly what we are in. In such situations, the record of history is unequivocal: either we create a Renaissance—a rebirth of the fundamental principles upon which civilization originated—or, our civilization dies.
The single, most important organizational component of this conspiracy was a Communist thinktank called the Institute for Social Research (I.S.R.), but popularly known as the Frankfurt School.
In the heady days immediately after the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, it was widely believed that proletarian revolution would momentarily sweep out of the Urals into Europe and, ultimately, North America. It did not; the only two attempts at workers’ government in the West— in Munich and Budapest—lasted only months. The Communist International (Comintern) therefore began several operations to determine why this was so. One such was headed by Georg Lukacs, a Hungarian aristocrat, son of one of the Hapsburg Empire’s leading bankers. Trained in Germany and already an important literary theorist, Lukacs became a Communist during World War I, writing as he joined the party, « Who will save us from Western civilization? » Lukacs was well-suited to the Comintern task: he had been one of the Commissars of Culture during the short-lived Hungarian Soviet in Budapest in 1919; in fact, modern historians link the shortness of the Budapest experiment to Lukacs’ orders mandating sex education in the schools, easy access to contraception, and the loosening of divorce laws—all of which revulsed Hungary’s Roman Catholic population.
Fleeing to the Soviet Union after the counter-revolution, Lukacs was secreted into Germany in 1922, where he chaired a meeting of Communist-oriented sociologists and intellectuals. This meeting founded the Institute for Social Research. Over the next decade, the Institute worked out what was to become the Comintern’s most successful psychological warfare operation against the capitalist West.
Lukacs identified that any political movement capable of bringing Bolshevism to the West would have to be, in his words, « demonic »; it would have to « possess the religious power which is capable of filling the entire soul; a power that characterized primitive Christianity. » However, Lukacs suggested, such a « messianic » political movement could only succeed when the individual believes that his or her actions are determined by « not a personal destiny, but the destiny of the community » in a world « that has been abandoned by God [emphasis added-MJM]. » Bolshevism worked in Russia because that nation was dominated by a peculiar gnostic form of Christianty typified by the writings of Fyodor Dostoyevsky. « The model for the new man is Alyosha Karamazov, » said Lukacs, referring to the Dostoyevsky character who willingly gave over his personal identity to a holy man, and thus ceased to be « unique, pure, and therefore abstract. »
This abandonment of the soul’s uniqueness also solves the problem of « the diabolic forces lurking in all violence » which must be unleashed in order to create a revolution. In this context, Lukacs cited the Grand Inquisitor section of Dostoyevsky’s The Brothers Karamazov, noting that the Inquisitor who is interrogating Jesus, has resolved the issue of good and evil: once man has understood his alienation from God, then any act in the service of the « destiny of the community » is justified; such an act can be « neither crime nor madness…. For crime and madness are objectifications of transcendental homelessness. »
According to an eyewitness, during meetings of the Hungarian Soviet leadership in 1919 to draw up lists for the firing squad, Lukacs would often quote the Grand Inquisitor: « And we who, for their happiness, have taken their sins upon ourselves, we stand before you and say, ‘Judge us if you can and if you dare.’ «
What differentiated the West from Russia, Lukacs identified, was a Judeo-Christian cultural matrix which emphasized exactly the uniqueness and sacredness of the individual which Lukacs abjured. At its core, the dominant Western ideology maintained that the individual, through the exercise of his or her reason, could discern the Divine Will in an unmediated relationship. What was worse, from Lukacs’ standpoint: this reasonable relationship necessarily implied that the individual could and should change the physical universe in pursuit of the Good; that Man should have dominion over Nature, as stated in the Biblical injunction in Genesis. The problem was, that as long as the individual had the belief—or even the hope of the belief—that his or her divine spark of reason could solve the problems facing society, then that society would never reach the state of hopelessness and alienation which Lukacs recognized as the necessary prerequisite for socialist revolution.
The task of the Frankfurt School, then, was first, to undermine the Judeo-Christian legacy through an « abolition of culture » (Aufhebung der Kultur in Lukacs’ German); and, second, to determine new cultural forms which would increase the alienation of the population, thus creating a « new barbarism. » To this task, there gathered in and around the Frankfurt School an incredible assortment of not only Communists, but also non-party socialists, radical phenomenologists, Zionists, renegade Freudians, and at least a few members of a self-identified « cult of Astarte. » The variegated membership reflected, to a certain extent, the sponsorship: although the Institute for Social Research started with Comintern support, over the next three decades its sources of funds included various German and American universities, the Rockefeller Foundation, Columbia Broadcasting System, the American Jewish Committee, several American intelligence services, the Office of the U.S. High Commissioner for Germany, the International Labour Organization, and the Hacker Institute, a posh psychiatric clinic in Beverly Hills.
Similarly, the Institute’s political allegiances: although top personnel maintained what might be called a sentimental relationship to the Soviet Union (and there is evidence that some of them worked for Soviet intelligence into the 1960’s), the Institute saw its goals as higher than that of Russian foreign policy. Stalin, who was horrified at the undisciplined, « cosmopolitan » operation set up by his predecessors, cut the Institute off in the late 1920’s, forcing Lukacs into « self-criticism, » and briefly jailing him as a German sympathizer during World War II.
Lukacs survived to briefly take up his old post as Minister of Culture during the anti-Stalinist Imre Nagy regime in Hungary. Of the other top Institute figures, the political perambulations of Herbert Marcuse are typical. He started as a Communist; became a protégé of philosopher Martin Heidegger even as the latter was joining the Nazi Party; coming to America, he worked for the World War II Office of Strategic Services (OSS), and later became the U.S. State Department’s top analyst of Soviet policy during the height of the McCarthy period; in the 1960’s, he turned again, to become the most important guru of the New Left; and he ended his days helping to found the environmentalist extremist Green Party in West Germany.
In all this seeming incoherence of shifting positions and contradictory funding, there is no ideological conflict. The invariant is the desire of all parties to answer Lukacs’ original question: « Who will save us from Western civilization? »
Theodor Adorno and Walter Benjamin
Perhaps the most important, if least-known, of the Frankfurt School’s successes was the shaping of the electronic media of radio and television into the powerful instruments of social control which they represent today. This grew out of the work originally done by two men who came to the Institute in the late 1920’s, Theodor Adorno and Walter Benjamin.
After completing studies at the University of Frankfurt, Walter Benjamin planned to emigrate to Palestine in 1924 with his friend Gershom Scholem (who later became one of Israel’s most famous philosophers, as well as Judaism’s leading gnostic), but was prevented by a love affair with Asja Lacis, a Latvian actress and Comintern stringer. Lacis whisked him off to the Italian island of Capri, a cult center from the time of the Emperor Tiberius, then used as a Comintern training base; the heretofore apolitical Benjamin wrote Scholem from Capri, that he had found « an existential liberation and an intensive insight into the actuality of radical communism. »
Lacis later took Benjamin to Moscow for further indoctrination, where he met playwright Bertolt Brecht, with whom he would begin a long collaboration; soon thereafter, while working on the first German translation of the drug-enthusiast French poet Baudelaire, Benjamin began serious experimentation with hallucinogens. In 1927, he was in Berlin as part of a group led by Adorno, studying the works of Lukacs; other members of the study group included Brecht and his composer-partner Kurt Weill; Hans Eisler, another composer who would later become a Hollywood film score composer and co-author with Adorno of the textbook Composition for the Film; the avant-garde photographer Imre Moholy-Nagy; and the conductor Otto Klemperer.
From 1928 to 1932, Adorno and Benjamin had an intensive collaboration, at the end of which they began publishing articles in the Institute’s journal, the Zeitschrift fär Sozialforschung. Benjamin was kept on the margins of the Institute, largely due to Adorno, who would later appropriate much of his work. As Hitler came to power, the Institute’s staff fled, but, whereas most were quickly spirited away to new deployments in the U.S. and England, there were no job offers for Benjamin, probably due to the animus of Adorno. He went to France, and, after the German invasion, fled to the Spanish border; expecting momentary arrest by the Gestapo, he despaired and died in a dingy hotel room of self-administered drug overdose.
Benjamin’s work remained almost completely unknown until 1955, when Scholem and Adorno published an edition of his material in Germany. The full revival occurred in 1968, when Hannah Arendt, Heidegger’s former mistress and a collaborator of the Institute in America, published a major article on Benjamin in the New Yorker magazine, followed in the same year by the first English translations of his work. Today, every university bookstore in the country boasts a full shelf devoted to translations of every scrap Benjamin wrote, plus exegesis, all with 1980’s copyright dates.
Adorno was younger than Benjamin, and as aggressive as the older man was passive. Born Teodoro Wiesengrund-Adorno to a Corsican family, he was taught the piano at an early age by an aunt who lived with the family and had been the concert accompanist to the international opera star Adelina Patti. It was generally thought that Theodor would become a professional musician, and he studied with Bernard Sekles, Paul Hindemith’s teacher. However, in 1918, while still a gymnasium student, Adorno met Siegfried Kracauer. Kracauer was part of a Kantian-Zionist salon which met at the house of Rabbi Nehemiah Nobel in Frankfurt; other members of the Nobel circle included philosopher Martin Buber, writer Franz Rosenzweig, and two students, Leo Lowenthal and Erich Fromm. Kracauer, Lowenthal, and Fromm would join the I.S.R. two decades later. Adorno engaged Kracauer to tutor him in the philosophy of Kant; Kracauer also introduced him to the writings of Lukacs and to Walter Benjamin, who was around the Nobel clique.
In 1924, Adorno moved to Vienna, to study with the atonalist composers Alban Berg and Arnold Schönberg, and became connected to the avant-garde and occult circle around the old Marxist Karl Kraus. Here, he not only met his future collaborator, Hans Eisler, but also came into contact with the theories of Freudian extremist Otto Gross. Gross, a long-time cocaine addict, had died in a Berlin gutter in 1920, while on his way to help the revolution in Budapest; he had developed the theory that mental health could only be achieved through the revival of the ancient cult of Astarte, which would sweep away monotheism and the « bourgeois family. »
Saving Marxist Aesthetics
By 1928, Adorno and Benjamin had satisfied their intellectual wanderlust, and settled down at the I.S.R. in Germany to do some work. As subject, they chose an aspect of the problem posed by Lukacs: how to give aesthetics a firmly materialistic basis. It was a question of some importance, at the time. Official Soviet discussions of art and culture, with their wild gyrations into « socialist realism » and « proletkult, » were idiotic, and only served to discredit Marxism’s claim to philosophy among intellectuals. Karl Marx’s own writings on the subject were sketchy and banal, at best.
In essence, Adorno and Benjamin’s problem was Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. At the beginning of the eighteenth century, Leibniz had once again obliterated the centuries-old gnostic dualism dividing mind and body, by demonstrating that matter does not think. A creative act in art or science apprehends the truth of the physical universe, but it is not determined by that physical universe. By self-consciously concentrating the past in the present to effect the future, the creative act, properly defined, is as immortal as the soul which envisions the act. This has fatal philosophical implications for Marxism, which rests entirely on the hypothesis that mental activity is determined by the social relations excreted by mankind’s production of its physical existence.
Marx sidestepped the problem of Leibniz, as did Adorno and Benjamin, although the latter did it with a lot more panache. It is wrong, said Benjamin in his first articles on the subject, to start with the reasonable, hypothesizing mind as the basis of the development of civilization; this is an unfortunate legacy of Socrates. As an alternative, Benjamin posed an Aristotelian fable in interpretation of Genesis: Assume that Eden were given to Adam as the primordial physical state. The origin of science and philosophy does not lie in the investigation and mastery of nature, but in the naming of the objects of nature; in the primordial state, to name a thing was to say all there was to say about that thing. In support of this, Benjamin cynically recalled the opening lines of the Gospel according to St. John, carefully avoiding the philosophically-broader Greek, and preferring the Vulgate (so that, in the phrase « In the beginning was the Word, » the connotations of the original Greek word logos—speech, reason, ratiocination, translated as « Word »—are replaced by the narrower meaning of the Latin word verbum). After the expulsion from Eden and God’s requirement that Adam eat his bread earned by the sweat of his face (Benjamin’s Marxist metaphor for the development of economies), and God’s further curse of Babel on Nimrod (that is, the development of nation-states with distinct languages, which Benjamin and Marx viewed as a negative process away from the « primitive communism » of Eden), humanity became « estranged » from the physical world.
Thus, Benjamin continued, objects still give off an « aura » of their primordial form, but the truth is now hopelessly elusive. In fact, speech, written language, art, creativity itself—that by which we master physicality—merely furthers the estrangement by attempting, in Marxist jargon, to incorporate objects of nature into the social relations determined by the class structure dominant at that point in history. The creative artist or scientist, therefore, is a vessel, like Ion the rhapsode as he described himself to Socrates, or like a modern « chaos theory » advocate: the creative act springs out of the hodgepodge of culture as if by magic. The more that bourgeois man tries to convey what he intends about an object, the less truthful he becomes; or, in one of Benjamin’s most oft-quoted statements, « Truth is the death of intention. »
This philosophical sleight-of-hand allows one to do several destructive things. By making creativity historically-specific, you rob it of both immortality and morality. One cannot hypothesize universal truth, or natural law, for truth is completely relative to historical development. By discarding the idea of truth and error, you also may throw out the « obsolete » concept of good and evil; you are, in the words of Friedrich Nietzsche, « beyond good and evil. » Benjamin is able, for instance, to defend what he calls the « Satanism » of the French Symbolists and their Surrealist successors, for at the core of this Satanism « one finds the cult of evil as a political device … to disinfect and isolate against all moralizing dilettantism » of the bourgeoisie. To condemn the Satanism of Rimbaud as evil, is as incorrect as to extol a Beethoven quartet or a Schiller poem as good; for both judgments are blind to the historical forces working unconsciously on the artist.
Thus, we are told, the late Beethoven’s chord structure was striving to be atonal, but Beethoven could not bring himself consciously to break with the structured world of Congress of Vienna Europe (Adorno’s thesis); similarly, Schiller really wanted to state that creativity was the liberation of the erotic, but as a true child of the Enlightenment and Immanuel Kant, he could not make the requisite renunciation of reason (Marcuse’s thesis). Epistemology becomes a poor relation of public opinion, since the artist does not consciously create works in order to uplift society, but instead unconsciously transmits the ideological assumptions of the culture into which he was born. The issue is no longer what is universally true, but what can be plausibly interpreted by the self-appointed guardians of the Zeitgeist.
« The Bad New Days »
Thus, for the Frankfort School, the goal of a cultural elite in the modern, « capitalist » era must be to strip away the belief that art derives from the self-conscious emulation of God the Creator; « religious illumination, » says Benjamin, must be shown to « reside in a profane illumination, a materialistic, anthropological inspiration, to which hashish, opium, or whatever else can give an introductory lesson. » At the same time, new cultural forms must be found to increase the alienation of the population, in order for it to understand how truly alienated it is to live without socialism. « Do not build on the good old days, but on the bad new ones, » said Benjamin.
The proper direction in painting, therefore, is that taken by the late Van Gogh, who began to paint objects in disintegration, with the equivalent of a hashish-smoker’s eye that « loosens and entices things out of their familiar world. » In music, « it is not suggested that one can compose better today » than Mozart or Beethoven, said Adorno, but one must compose atonally, for atonalism is sick, and « the sickness, dialectically, is at the same time the cure….The extraordinarily violent reaction protest which such music confronts in the present society … appears nonetheless to suggest that the dialectical function of this music can already be felt … negatively, as ‘destruction.’ «
The purpose of modern art, literature, and music must be to destroy the uplifting—therefore, bourgeois — potential of art, literature, and music, so that man, bereft of his connection to the divine, sees his only creative option to be political revolt. « To organize pessimism means nothing other than to expel the moral metaphor from politics and to discover in political action a sphere reserved one hundred percent for images. » Thus, Benjamin collaborated with Brecht to work these theories into practical form, and their joint effort culminated in the Verfremdungseffekt (« estrangement effect »), Brecht’s attempt to write his plays so as to make the audience leave the theatre demoralized and aimlessly angry.
The Adorno-Benjamin analysis represents almost the entire theoretical basis of all the politically correct aesthetic trends which now plague our universities. The Poststructuralism of Roland Barthes, Michel Foucault, and Jacques Derrida, the Semiotics of Umberto Eco, the Deconstructionism of Paul DeMan, all openly cite Benjamin as the source of their work. The Italian terrorist Eco’s best-selling novel, The Name of the Rose, is little more than a paean to Benjamin; DeMan, the former Nazi collaborator in Belgium who became a prestigious Yale professor, began his career translating Benjamin; Barthes’ infamous 1968 statement that « [t]he author is dead, » is meant as an elaboration of Benjamin’s dictum on intention. Benjamin has actually been called the heir of Leibniz and of Wilhelm von Humboldt, the philologist collaborator of Schiller whose educational reforms engendered the tremendous development of Germany in the nineteenth century. Even as recently as September 1991, the Washington Post referred to Benjamin as « the finest German literary theorist of the century (and many would have left off that qualifying German). »
Readers have undoubtedly heard one or another horror story about how an African-American Studies Department has procured a ban on Othello, because it is « racist, » or how a radical feminist professor lectured a Modern Language Association meeting on the witches as the « true heroines » of Macbeth. These atrocities occur because the perpetrators are able to plausibly demonstrate, in the tradition of Benjamin and Adorno, that Shakespeare’s intent is irrelevant; what is important, is the racist or phallocentric « subtext » of which Shakespeare was unconscious when he wrote.
When the local Women’s Studies or Third World Studies Department organizes students to abandon classics in favor of modern Black and feminist authors, the reasons given are pure Benjamin. It is not that these modern writers are better, but they are somehow more truthful because their alienated prose reflects the modern social problems of which the older authors were ignorant! Students are being taught that language itself is, as Benjamin said, merely a conglomeration of false « names » foisted upon society by its oppressors, and are warned against « logocentrism, » the bourgeois over-reliance on words.
If these campus antics appear « retarded » (in the words of Adorno), that is because they are designed to be. The Frankfurt School’s most important breakthrough consists in the realization that their monstrous theories could become dominant in the culture, as a result of the changes in society brought about by what Benjamin called « the age of mechanical reproduction of art. »
Before the twentieth century, the distinction between art and « entertainment » was much more pronounced. One could be entertained by art, certainly, but the experience was active, not passive. On the first level, one had to make a conscious choice to go to a concert, to view a certain art exhibit, to buy a book or piece of sheet music. It was unlikely that any more than an infinitesimal fraction of the population would have the opportunity to see King Lear or hear Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony more than once or twice in a lifetime. Art demanded that one bring one’s full powers of concentration and knowledge of the subject to bear on each experience, or else the experience were considered wasted. These were the days when memorization of poetry and whole plays, and the gathering of friends and family for a « parlor concert, » were the norm, even in rural households. These were also the days before « music appreciation »; when one studied music, as many did, they learned to play it, not appreciate it.
However, the new technologies of radio, film, and recorded music represented, to use the appropriate Marxist buzz-word, (see box) a dialectical potential. On the one hand, these technologies held out the possibility of bringing the greatest works of art to millions of people who would otherwise not have access to them. On the other, the fact that the experience was infinitely reproducible could tend to disengage the audience’s mind, making the experience less sacred, thus increasing alienation. Adorno called this process, « demythologizing. » This new passivity, Adorno hypothesized in a crucial article published in 1938, could fracture a musical composition into the « entertaining » parts which would be « fetishized » in the memory of the listener, and the difficult parts, which would be forgotten. Adorno continues,
The counterpart to the fetishism is a regression of listening. This does not mean a relapse of the individual listener into an earlier phase of his own development, nor a decline in the collective general level, since the millions who are reached musically for the first time by today’s mass communications cannot be compared with the audiences of the past. Rather, it is the contemporary listening which has regressed, arrested at the infantile stage. Not only do the listening subjects lose, along with the freedom of choice and responsibility, the capacity for the conscious perception of music …. [t]hey fluctuate between comprehensive forgetting and sudden dives into recognition. They listen atomistically and dissociate what they hear, but precisely in this dissociation they develop certain capacities which accord less with the traditional concepts of aesthetics than with those of football or motoring. They are not childlike … but they are childish; their primitivism is not that of the undeveloped, but that of the forcibly retarded. [emphasis aded]
This conceptual retardation and preconditioning caused by listening, suggested that programming could determine preference. The very act of putting, say, a Benny Goodman number next to a Mozart sonata on the radio, would tend to amalgamate both into entertaining « music-on-the-radio » in the mind of the listener. This meant that even new and unpalatable ideas could become popular by « re-naming » them through the universal homogenizer of the culture industry. As Benjamin puts it,
Mechanical reproduction of art changes the reaction of the masses toward art. The reactionary attitude toward a Picasso painting changes into a progressive reaction toward a Chaplin movie. The progressive reaction is characterized by the direct, intimate fusion of visual and emotional enjoyment with the orientation of the expert…. With regard to the screen, the critical and receptive attitudes of the public coincide. The decisive reason for this is that the individual reactions are predetermined by the mass audience response they are about to produce, and this is nowhere more pronounced than in the film.
At the same time, the magic power of the media could be used to re-define previous ideas. « Shakespeare, Rembrandt, Beethoven will all make films, » concluded Benjamin, quoting the French film pioneer Abel Gance, « … all legends, all mythologies, all myths, all founders of religions, and the very religions themselves … await their exposed resurrection. »
Social Control: The « Radio Project »
Here, then, were some potent theories of social control. The great possibilities of this Frankfurt School media work were probably the major contributing factor in the support given the I.S.R. by the bastions of the Establishment, after the Institute transferred its operations to America in 1934.
In 1937, the Rockefeller Foundation began funding research into the social effects of new forms of mass media, particularly radio. Before World War I, radio had been a hobbyist’s toy, with only 125,000 receiving sets in the entire U.S.; twenty years later, it had become the primary mode of entertainment in the country; out of 32 million American families in 1937, 27.5 million had radios — a larger percentage than had telephones, automobiles, plumbing, or electricity! Yet, almost no systematic research had been done up to this point. The Rockefeller Foundation enlisted several universities, and headquartered this network at the School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University. Named the Office of Radio Research, it was popularly known as « the Radio Project. »
The director of the Project was Paul Lazersfeld, the foster son of Austrian Marxist economist Rudolph Hilferding, and a long-time collaborator of the I.S.R. from the early 1930’s. Under Lazersfeld was Frank Stanton, a recent Ph.D. in industrial psychology from Ohio State, who had just been made research director of Columbia Broadcasting System—a grand title but a lowly position. After World War II, Stanton became president of the CBS News Division, and ultimately president of CBS at the height of the TV network’s power; he also became Chairman of the Board of the RAND Corporation, and a member of President Lyndon Johnson’s « kitchen cabinet. » Among the Project’s researchers were Herta Herzog, who married Lazersfeld and became the first director of research for the Voice of America; and Hazel Gaudet, who became one of the nation’s leading political pollsters. Theodor Adorno was named chief of the Project’s music section.
Despite the official gloss, the activities of the Radio Project make it clear that its purpose was to test empirically the Adorno-Benjamin thesis that the net effect of the mass media could be to atomize and increase lability—what people would later call « brainwashing. »
Soap Operas and the Invasion from Mars
The first studies were promising. Herta Herzog produced « On Borrowed Experiences, » the first comprehensive research on soap operas. The « serial radio drama » format was first used in 1929, on the inspiration of the old, cliff-hanger « Perils of Pauline » film serial. Because these little radio plays were highly melodramatic, they became popularly identified with Italian grand opera; because they were often sponsored by soap manufacturers, they ended up with the generic name, « soap opera. »
Until Herzog’s work, it was thought that the immense popularity of this format was largely with women of the lowest socioeconomic status who, in the restricted circumstances of their lives, needed a helpful escape to exotic places and romantic situations. A typical article from that period by two University of Chicago psychologists, « The Radio Day-Time Serial: Symbol Analysis » published in the Genetic Psychology Monographs, solemnly emphasized the positive, claiming that the soaps « function very much like the folk tale, expressing the hopes and fears of its female audience, and on the whole contribute to the integration of their lives into the world in which they live. »
Herzog found that there was, in fact, no correlation to socioeconomic status. What is more, there was surprisingly little correlation to content. The key factor — as Adorno and Benjamin’s theories suggested it would be — was the form itself of the serial; women were being effectively addicted to the format, not so much to be entertained or to escape, but to « find out what happens next week. » In fact, Herzog found, you could almost double the listenership of a radio play by dividing it into segments.
Modern readers will immediately recognize that this was not a lesson lost on the entertainment industry. Nowadays, the serial format has spread to children’s programming and high-budget prime time shows. The most widely watched shows in the history of television, remain the « Who Killed JR? » installment of Dallas, and the final episode of M*A*S*H, both of which were premised on a « what happens next? » format. Even feature films, like the Star Wars and Back to the Future trilogies, are now produced as serials, in order to lock in a viewership for the later installments. The humble daytime soap also retains its addictive qualities in the current age: 70% of all American women over eighteen now watch at least two of these shows each day, and there is a fast-growing viewership among men and college students of both sexes.
The Radio Project’s next major study was an investigation into the effects of Orson Welles’ Halloween 1938 radioplay based on H.G. Wells’ War of the Worlds. Six million people heard the broadcast realistically describing a Martian invasion force landing in rural New Jersey. Despite repeated and clear statements that the show was fictional, approximately 25% of the listeners thought it was real, some panicking outright. The Radio Project researchers found that a majority of the people who panicked did not think that men from Mars had invaded; they actually thought that the Germans had invaded.
It happened this way. The listeners had been psychologically pre-conditioned by radio reports from the Munich crisis earlier that year. During that crisis, CBS’s man in Europe, Edward R. Murrow, hit upon the idea of breaking into regular programming to present short news bulletins. For the first time in broadcasting, news was presented not in longer analytical pieces, but in short clips—what we now call « audio bites. » At the height of the crisis, these flashes got so numerous, that, in the words of Murrow’s producer Fred Friendly, « news bulletins were interrupting news bulletins. » As the listeners thought that the world was moving to the brink of war, CBS ratings rose dramatically. When Welles did his fictional broadcast later, after the crisis had receded, he used this news bulletin technique to give things verisimilitude: he started the broadcast by faking a standard dance-music program, which kept getting interrupted by increasingly terrifying « on the scene reports » from New Jersey. Listeners who panicked, reacted not to content, but to format; they heard « We interrupt this program for an emergency bulletin, » and « invasion, » and immediately concluded that Hitler had invaded. The soap opera technique, transposed to the news, had worked on a vast and unexpected scale.
Little Annie and the « Wagnerian Dream » of TV
In 1939, one of the numbers of the quarterly Journal of Applied Psychology was handed over to Adorno and the Radio Project to publish some of their findings. Their conclusion was that Americans had, over the last twenty years, become « radio-minded, » and that their listening had become so fragmented that repetition of format was the key to popularity. The play list determined the « hits »—a truth well known to organized crime, both then and now—and repetition could make any form of music or any performer, even a classical music performer, a « star. » As long as a familiar form or context was retained, almost any content would become acceptable. « Not only are hit songs, stars, and soap operas cyclically recurrent and rigidly invariable types, » said Adorno, summarizing this material a few years later, « but the specific content of the entertainment itself is derived from them and only appears to change. The details are interchangeable. »
The crowning achievement of the Radio Project was « Little Annie, » officially titled the Stanton-Lazersfeld Program Analyzer. Radio Project research had shown that all previous methods of preview polling were ineffectual. Up to that point, a preview audience listened to a show or watched a film, and then was asked general questions: did you like the show? what did you think of so-and-so’s performance? The Radio Project realized that this method did not take into account the test audience’s atomized perception of the subject, and demanded that they make a rational analysis of what was intended to be an irrational experience. So, the Project created a device in which each test audience member was supplied with a type of rheostat on which he could register the intensity of his likes or dislikes on a moment-to-moment basis. By comparing the individual graphs produced by the device, the operators could determine, not if the audience liked the whole show — which was irrelevant—but, which situations or characters produced a positive, if momentary, feeling state.
Little Annie transformed radio, film, and ultimately television programming. CBS still maintains program analyzer facilities in Hollywood and New York; it is said that results correlate 85% to ratings. Other networks and film studios have similar operations. This kind of analysis is responsible for the uncanny feeling you get when, seeing a new film or TV show, you think you have seen it all before. You have, many times. If a program analyzer indicates that, for instance, audiences were particularly titilated by a short scene in a World War II drama showing a certain type of actor kissing a certain type of actress, then that scene format will be worked into dozens of screenplays—transposed to the Middle Ages, to outer space, etc., etc.
The Radio Project also realized that television had the potential to intensify all of the effects that they had studied. TV technology had been around for some years, and had been exhibited at the 1936 World’s Fair in New York, but the only person to attempt serious utilization of the medium had been Adolf Hitler. The Nazis broadcast events from the 1936 Olympic Games « live » to communal viewing rooms around Germany; they were trying to expand on their great success in using radio to Nazify all aspects of German culture. Further plans for German TV development were sidetracked by war preparations.
Adorno understood this potential perfectly, writing in 1944:
Television aims at the synthesis of radio and film, and is held up only because the interested parties have not yet reached agreement, but its consequences will be quite enormous and promise to intensify the impoverishment of aesthetic matter so drastically, that by tomorrow the thinly veiled identity of all industrial culture products can come triumphantly out in the open, derisively fulfilling the Wagnerian dream of the Gesamtkunstwerk—the fusion of all the arts in one work.
The obvious point is this: the profoundly irrational forms of modern entertainment—the stupid and eroticized content of most TV and films, the fact that your local Classical music radio station programs Stravinsky next to Mozart—don’t have to be that way. They were designed to be that way. The design was so successful, that today, no one even questions the reasons or the origins. (see box)
The efforts of the Radio Project conspirators to manipulate the population, spawned the modern pseudoscience of public opinion polling, in order to gain greater control over the methods they were developing.
Today, public opinion polls, like the television news, have been completely integrated into our society. A « scientific survey » of what people are said to think about an issue can be produced in less than twenty-four hours. Some campaigns for high political office are completely shaped by polls; in fact, many politicians try to create issues which are themselves meaningless, but which they know will look good in the polls, purely for the purpose of enhancing their image as « popular. » Important policy decisions are made, even before the actual vote of the citizenry or the legislature, by poll results. Newspapers will occasionally write pious editorials calling on people to think for themselves, even as the newspaper’s business agent sends a check to the local polling organization.
The idea of « public opinion » is not new, of course. Plato spoke against it in his Republic over two millenia ago; Alexis de Tocqueville wrote at length of its influence over America in the early nineteenth century. But, nobody thought to measure public opinion before the twentieth century, and nobody before the 1930’s thought to use those measurements for decision-making.
It is useful to pause and reflect on the whole concept. The belief that public opinion can be a determinant of truth is philosophically insane. It precludes the idea of the rational individual mind. Every individual mind contains the divine spark of reason, and is thus capable of scientific discovery, and understanding the discoveries of others. The individual mind is one of the few things that cannot, therefore, be « averaged. » Consider: at the moment of creative discovery, it is possible, if not probable, that the scientist making the discovery is the only person to hold that opinion about nature, whereas everyone else has a different opinion, or no opinion. One can only imagine what a « scientifically-conducted survey » on Kepler’s model of the solar system would have been, shortly after he published the Harmony of the World: 2% for, 48% against, 50% no opinion.
These psychoanalytic survey techniques became standard, not only for the Frankfurt School, but also throughout American social science departments, particularly after the I.S.R. arrived in the United States. The methodology was the basis of the research piece for which the Frankfurt School is most well known, the « authoritarian personality » project. In 1942, I.S.R. director Max Horkheimer made contact with the American Jewish Committee, which asked him to set up a Department of Scientific Research within its organization. The American Jewish Committee also provided a large grant to study anti-Semitism in the American population. « Our aim, » wrote Horkheimer in the introduction to the study, « is not merely to describe prejudice, but to explain it in order to help in its eradication…. Eradication means reeducation scientifically planned on the basis of understanding scientifically arrived at. »
The A-S Scale
Ultimately, five volumes were produced for this study over the course of the late 1940’s; the most important was the last, The Authoritarian Personality, by Adorno, with the help of three Berkeley, California social psychologists.
In the 1930’s Erich Fromm had devised a questionnaire to be used to analyze German workers pychoanalytically as « authoritarian, » « revolutionary » or « ambivalent. » The heart of Adorno’s study was, once again, Fromm’s psychoanalytic scale, but with the positive end changed from a « revolutionary personality, » to a « democratic personality, » in order to make things more palatable for a postwar audience.
Nine personality traits were tested and measured, including:
From these measurements were constructed several scales: the E Scale (ethnocentrism), the PEC Scale (poltical and economic conservatism), the A-S Scale (anti-Semitism), and the F Scale (fascism). Using Rensis Lickerts’s methodology of weighting results, the authors were able to tease together an empirical definition of what Adorno called « a new anthropological type, » the authoritarian personality. The legerdemain here, as in all psychoanalytic survey work, is the assumption of a Weberian « type. » Once the type has been statistically determined, all behavior can be explained; if an anti-Semitic personality does not act in an anti-Semitic way, then he or she has an ulterior motive for the act, or is being discontinuous. The idea that a human mind is capable of transformation, is ignored.
The results of this very study can be interpreted in diametrically different ways. One could say that the study proved that the population of the U.S. was generally conservative, did not want to abandon a capitalist economy, believed in a strong family and that sexual promiscuity should be punished, thought that the postwar world was a dangerous place, and was still suspicious of Jews (and Blacks, Roman Catholics, Orientals, etc. — unfortunately true, but correctable in a social context of economic growth and cultural optimism). On the other hand, one could take the same results and prove that anti-Jewish pogroms and Nuremburg rallies were simmering just under the surface, waiting for a new Hitler to ignite them. Which of the two interpretations you accept is a political, not a scientific, decision. Horkheimer and Adorno firmly believed that all religions, Judaism included, were « the opiate of the masses. » Their goal was not the protection of Jews from prejudice, but the creation of a definition of authoritarianism and anti-Semitism which could be exploited to force the « scientifically planned reeducation » of Americans and Europeans away from the principles of Judeo-Christian civilization, which the Frankfurt School despised. In their theoretical writings of this period, Horkheimer and Adorno pushed the thesis to its most paranoid: just as capitalism was inherently fascistic, the philosophy of Christianity itself is the source of anti-Semitism. As Horkheimer and Adorno jointly wrote in their 1947 « Elements of Anti-Semitism »:
Christ, the spirit become flesh, is the deified sorcerer. Man’s self-reflection in the absolute, the humanization of God by Christ, is the proton pseudos [original falsehood]. Progress beyond Judaism is coupled with the assumption that the man Jesus has become God. The reflective aspect of Christianity, the intellectualization of magic, is the root of evil.
At the same time, Horkheimer could write in a more-popularized article titled « Anti-Semitism: A Social Disease, » that « at present, the only country where there does not seem to be any kind of anti-Semitism is Russia »[!].
This self-serving attempt to maximize paranoia was further aided by Hannah Arendt, who popularized the authoritarian personality research in her widely-read Origins of Totalitarianism. Arendt also added the famous rhetorical flourish about the « banality of evil » in her later Eichmann in Jerusalem: even a simple, shopkeeper-type like Eichmann can turn into a Nazi beast under the right psychological circumstances—every Gentile is suspect, psychoanalytically.
It is Arendt’s extreme version of the authoritarian personality thesis which is the operant philosophy of today’s Cult Awareness Network (CAN), a group which works with the U.S. Justice Department and the Anti-Defamation League of the B’nai B’rith, among others. Using standard Frankfurt School method, CAN identifies political and religious groups which are its political enemies, then re-labels them as a « cult, » in order to justify operations against them. (See box.)
The Public Opinion Explosion
Despite its unprovable central thesis of « psychoanalytic types, » the interpretive survey methodology of the Frankfurt School became dominant in the social sciences, and essentially remains so today. In fact, the adoption of these new, supposedly scientific techniques in the 1930’s brought about an explosion in public-opinion survey use, much of it funded by Madison Avenue. The major pollsters of today—A.C. Neilsen, George Gallup, Elmo Roper—started in the mid-1930’s, and began using the I.S.R. methods, especially given the success of the Stanton-Lazersfeld Program Analyzer. By 1936, polling activity had become sufficiently widespread to justify a trade association, the American Academy of Public Opinion Research at Princeton, headed by Lazersfeld; at the same time, the University of Chicago created the National Opinion Research Center. In 1940, the Office of Radio Research was turned into the Bureau of Applied Social Research, a division of Columbia University, with the indefatigable Lazersfeld as director.
After World War II, Lazersfeld especially pioneered the use of surveys to psychoanalyze American voting behavior, and by the 1952 Presidential election, Madison Avenue advertising agencies were firmly in control of Dwight Eisenhower’s campaign, utilizing Lazersfeld’s work. Nineteen fifty-two was also the first election under the influence of television, which, as Adorno had predicted eight years earlier, had grown to incredible influence in a very short time. Batten, Barton, Durstine & Osborne — the fabled « BBD&O » ad agency—designed Ike’s campaign appearances entirely for the TV cameras, and as carefully as Hitler’s Nuremberg rallies; one-minute « spot » advertisements were pioneered to cater to the survey-determined needs of the voters.
This snowball has not stopped rolling since. The entire development of television and advertising in the 1950’s and 1960’s was pioneered by men and women who were trained in the Frankfurt School’s techniques of mass alienation. Frank Stanton went directly from the Radio Project to become the single most-important leader of modern television. Stanton’s chief rival in the formative period of TV was NBC’s Sylvester « Pat » Weaver; after a Ph.D. in « listening behavior, » Weaver worked with the Program Analyzer in the late 1930’s, before becoming a Young & Rubicam vice-president, then NBC’s director of programming, and ultimately the network’s president. Stanton and Weaver’s stories are typical.
Today, the men and women who run the networks, the ad agencies, and the polling organizations, even if they have never heard of Theodor Adorno, firmly believe in Adorno’s theory that the media can, and should, turn all they touch into « football. » Coverage of the 1991 Gulf War should make that clear.
The technique of mass media and advertising developed by the Frankfurt School now effectively controls American political campaigning. Campaigns are no longer based on political programs, but actually on alienation. Petty gripes and irrational fears are identified by psychoanalytic survey, to be transmogrified into « issues » to be catered to; the « Willy Horton » ads of the 1988 Presidential campaign, and the « flag-burning amendment, » are but two recent examples. Issues that will determine the future of our civilization, are scrupulously reduced to photo opportunities and audio bites—like Ed Murrow’s original 1930’s radio reports—where the dramatic effect is maximized, and the idea content is zero.
Who Is the Enemy?
Part of the influence of the authoritarian personality hoax in our own day also derives from the fact that, incredibly, the Frankfurt School and its theories were officially accepted by the U.S. government during World War II, and these Cominternists were responsible for determining who were America’s wartime, and postwar, enemies. In 1942, the Office of Strategic Services, America’s hastily-constructed espionage and covert operations unit, asked former Harvard president James Baxter to form a Research and Analysis (R&A) Branch under the group’s Intelligence Division. By 1944, the R&A Branch had collected such a large and prestigeous group of emigré scholars that H. Stuart Hughes, then a young Ph.D., said that working for it was « a second graduate education » at government expense. The Central European Section was headed by historian Carl Schorske; under him, in the all-important Germany/Austria Section, was Franz Neumann, as section chief, with Herbert Marcuse, Paul Baran, and Otto Kirchheimer, all I.S.R. veterans. Leo Lowenthal headed the German-language section of the Office of War Information; Sophie Marcuse, Marcuse’s wife, worked at the Office of Naval Intelligence. Also at the R&A Branch were: Siegfried Kracauer, Adorno’s old Kant instructor, now a film theorist; Norman O. Brown, who would become famous in the 1960’s by combining Marcuse’s hedonism theory with Wilhelm Reich’s orgone therapy to popularize « polymorphous perversity »; Barrington Moore, Jr., later a philosophy professor who would co-author a book with Marcuse; Gregory Bateson, the husband of anthropologist Margaret Mead (who wrote for the Frankfurt School’s journal), and Arthur Schlesinger, the historian who joined the Kennedy Administration. Marcuse’s first assignment was to head a team to identify both those who would be tried as war criminals after the war, and also those who were potential leaders of postwar Germany. In 1944, Marcuse, Neumann, and Kirchheimer wrote the Denazification Guide, which was later issued to officers of the U.S. Armed Forces occupying Germany, to help them identify and suppress pro-Nazi behaviors. After the armistice, the R&A Branch sent representatives to work as intelligence liaisons with the various occupying powers; Marcuse was assigned the U.S. Zone, Kirchheimer the French, and Barrington Moore the Soviet. In the summer of 1945, Neumann left to become chief of research for the Nuremburg Tribunal. Marcuse remained in and around U.S. intelligence into the early 1950’s, rising to the chief of the Central European Branch of the State Department’s Office of Intelligence Research, an office formally charged with « planning and implementing a program of positive-intelligence research … to meet the intelligence requirements of the Central Intelligence Agency and other authorized agencies. » During his tenure as a U.S. government official, Marcuse supported the division of Germany into East and West, noting that this would prevent an alliance between the newly liberated left-wing parties and the old, conservative industrial and business layers. In 1949, he produced a 532-page report, « The Potentials of World Communism » (declassified only in 1978), which suggested that the Marshall Plan economic stabilization of Europe would limit the recruitment potential of Western Europe’s Communist Parties to acceptable levels, causing a period of hostile co-existence with the Soviet Union, marked by confrontation only in faraway places like Latin America and Indochina—in all, a surprisingly accurate forecast. Marcuse left the State Department with a Rockefeller Foundation grant to work with the various Soviet Studies departments which were set up at many of America’s top universities after the war, largely by R&A Branch veterans.
At the same time, Max Horkheimer was doing even greater damage. As part of the denazification of Germany suggested by the R&A Branch, U.S. High Commissioner for Germany John J. McCloy, using personal discretionary funds, brought Horkheimer back to Germany to reform the German university system. In fact, McCloy asked President Truman and Congress to pass a bill granting Horkheimer, who had become a naturalized American, dual citizenship; thus, for a brief period, Horkheimer was the only person in the world to hold both German and U.S. citizenship. In Germany, Horkheimer began the spadework for the full-blown revival of the Frankfurt School in that nation in the late 1950’s, including the training of a whole new generation of anti-Western civilization scholars like Hans-Georg Gadamer and Jürgen Habermas, who would have such destructive influence in 1960’s Germany. In a period of American history when some individuals were being hounded into unemployment and suicide for the faintest aroma of leftism, Frankfurt School veterans—all with superb Comintern credentials — led what can only be called charmed lives. America had, to an incredible extent, handed the determination of who were the nation’s enemies, over to the nation’s own worst enemies.
In 1989, Hans-Georg Gadamer, a protégé of Martin Heidegger and the last of the original Frankfurt School generation, was asked to provide an appreciation of his own work for the German newspaper, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. He wrote,
One has to conceive of Aristotle’s ethics as a true fulfillment of the Socratic challenge, which Plato had placed at the center of his dialogues on the Socratic question of the good…. Plato described the idea of the good … as the ultimate and highest idea, which is supposedly the highest principle of being for the universe, the state, and the human soul. Against this Aristotle opposed a decisive critique, under the famous formula, « Plato is my friend, but the truth is my friend even more. » He denied that one could consider the idea of the good as a universal principle of being, which is supposed to hold in the same way for theoretical knowledge as for practical knowledge and human activity.
This statement not only succinctly states the underlying philosophy of the Frankfurt School, it also suggests an inflection point around which we can order much of the philosophical combat of the last two millenia. In the simplest terms, the Aristotelian correction of Plato sunders physics from metaphysics, relegating the Good to a mere object of speculation about which « our knowledge remains only a hypothesis, » in the words of Wilhelm Dilthey, the Frankfurt School’s favorite philosopher. Our knowledge of the « real world, » as Dilthey, Nietzsche, and other precursors of the Frankfurt School were wont to emphasize, becomes erotic, in the broadest sense of that term, as object fixation. The universe becomes a collection of things which each operate on the basis of their own natures (that is, genetically), and through interaction between themselves (that is, mechanistically). Science becomes the deduction of the appropriate categories of these natures and interactions. Since the human mind is merely a sensorium, waiting for the Newtonian apple to jar it into deduction, humanity’s relationship to the world (and vice versa) becomes an erotic attachment to objects. The comprehension of the universal—the mind’s seeking to be the living image of the living God—is therefore illusory. That universal either does not exist, or it exists incomprehensibly as a deus ex machina; that is, the Divine exists as a superaddition to the physical universe — God is really Zeus, flinging thunderbolts into the world from some outside location. (Or, perhaps more appropriately: God is really Cupid, letting loose golden arrows to make objects attract, and leaden arrows to make objects repel.) The key to the entire Frankfurt School program, from originator Lukacs on, is the « liberation » of Aristotelian eros, to make individual feeling states psychologically primary. When the I.S.R. leaders arrived in the United States in the mid-1930’s, they exulted that here was a place which had no adequate philosophical defenses against their brand of Kulturpessimismus [cultural pessimism]. However, although the Frankfurt School made major inroads in American intellectual life before World War II, that influence was largely confined to academia and to radio; and radio, although important, did not yet have the overwhelming influence on social life that it would acquire during the war. Furthermore, America’s mobilization for the war, and the victory against fascism, sidetracked the Frankfurt School schedule; America in 1945 was almost sublimely optimistic, with a population firmly convinced that a mobilized republic, backed by science and technology, could do just about anything. The fifteen years after the war, however, saw the domination of family life by the radio and television shaped by the Frankfurt School, in a period of political erosion in which the great positive potential of America degenerated to a purely negative posture against the real and, oftentimes manipulated, threat of the Soviet Union. At the same time, hundreds of thousands of the young generation—the so-called baby boomers—were entering college and being exposed to the Frankfurt School’s poison, either directly or indirectly. It is illustrative, that by 1960, sociology had become the most popular course of study in American universities. Indeed, when one looks at the first stirrings of the student rebellion at the beginning of the 1960’s, like the speeches of the Berkeley Free Speech Movement or the Port Huron Statement which founded the Students for a Democratic Society, one is struck with how devoid of actual content these discussions were. There is much anxiety about being made to conform to the system— »I am a human being; do not fold, spindle, or mutilate » went an early Berkeley slogan—but it is clear that the « problems » cited derive much more from required sociology textbooks, than from the real needs of the society.
The CIA’s Psychedelic Revolution
The simmering unrest on campus in 1960 might well too have passed or had a positive outcome, were it not for the traumatic decapitation of the nation through the Kennedy assassination, plus the simultaneous introduction of widespread drug use. Drugs had always been an « analytical tool » of the nineteenth century Romantics, like the French Symbolists, and were popular among the European and American Bohemian fringe well into the post-World War II period. But, in the second half of the 1950’s, the CIA and allied intelligence services began extensive experimentation with the hallucinogen LSD to investigate its potential for social control. It has now been documented that millions of doses of the chemical were produced and disseminated under the aegis of the CIA’s Operation MK-Ultra. LSD became the drug of choice within the agency itself, and was passed out freely to friends of the family, including a substantial number of OSS veterans. For instance, it was OSS Research and Analysis Branch veteran Gregory Bateson who « turned on » the Beat poet Allen Ginsberg to a U.S. Navy LSD experiment in Palo Alto, California. Not only Ginsberg, but novelist Ken Kesey and the original members of the Grateful Dead rock group opened the doors of perception courtesy of the Navy. The guru of the « psychedelic revolution, » Timothy Leary, first heard about hallucinogens in 1957 from Life magazine (whose publisher, Henry Luce, was often given government acid, like many other opinion shapers), and began his career as a CIA contract employee; at a 1977 « reunion » of acid pioneers, Leary openly admitted, « everything I am, I owe to the foresight of the CIA. » Hallucinogens have the singular effect of making the victim asocial, totally self-centered, and concerned with objects. Even the most banal objects take on the « aura » which Benjamin had talked about, and become timeless and delusionarily profound. In other words, hallucinogens instantaneously achieve a state of mind identical to that prescribed by the Frankfurt School theories. And, the popularization of these chemicals created a vast psychological lability for bringing those theories into practice. Thus, the situation at the beginning of the 1960’s represented a brilliant re-entry point for the Frankfurt School, and it was fully exploited. One of the crowning ironies of the « Now Generation » of 1964 on, is that, for all its protestations of utter modernity, none of its ideas or artifacts was less than thirty years old. The political theory came completely from the Frankfurt School; Lucien Goldmann, a French radical who was a visiting professor at Columbia in 1968, was absolutely correct when he said of Herbert Marcuse in 1969 that « the student movements … found in his works and ultimately in his works alone the theoretical formulation of their problems and aspirations [emphasis in original]. » The long hair and sandals, the free love communes, the macrobiotic food, the liberated lifestyles, had been designed at the turn of the century, and thoroughly field-tested by various, Frankfurt School-connected New Age social experiments like the Ascona commune before 1920. (See box.) Even Tom Hayden’s defiant « Never trust anyone over thirty, » was merely a less-urbane version of Rupert Brooke’s 1905, « Nobody over thirty is worth talking to. » The social planners who shaped the 1960’s simply relied on already-available materials.
Eros and Civilization
The founding document of the 1960’s counterculture, and that which brought the Frankfurt School’s « revolutionary messianism » of the 1920’s into the 1960’s, was Marcuse’s Eros and Civilization, originally published in 1955 and funded by the Rockefeller Foundation. The document masterfully sums up the Frankfurt School ideology of Kulturpessimismus in the concept of « dimensionality. » In one of the most bizarre perversions of philosophy, Marcuse claims to derive this concept from Friedrich Schiller. Schiller, whom Marcuse purposefully misidentifies as the heir of Immanuel Kant, discerned two dimensions in humanity: a sensuous instinct and an impulse toward form. Schiller advocated the harmonization of these two instincts in man in the form of a creative play instinct. For Marcuse, on the other hand, the only hope to escape the one-dimensionality of modern industrial society was to liberate the erotic side of man, the sensuous instinct, in rebellion against « technological rationality. » As Marcuse would say later (1964) in his One-Dimensional Man, « A comfortable, smooth, reasonable, democratic unfreedom prevails in advanced industrial civilization, a token of technical progress. » This erotic liberation he misidentifies with Schiller’s « play instinct, » which, rather than being erotic, is an expression of charity, the higher concept of love associated with true creativity. Marcuse’s contrary theory of erotic liberation is something implicit in Sigmund Freud, but not explicitly emphasized, except for some Freudian renegades like Wilhelm Reich and, to a certain extent, Carl Jung. Every aspect of culture in the West, including reason itself, says Marcuse, acts to repress this: « The totalitarian universe of technological rationality is the latest transmutation of the idea of reason. » Or: « Auschwitz continues to haunt, not the memory but the accomplishments of man—the space flights, the rockets and missiles, the pretty electronics plants…. »
This erotic liberation should take the form of the « Great Refusal, » a total rejection of the « capitalist » monster and all his works, including « technological » reason, and « ritual-authoritarian language. » As part of the Great Refusal, mankind should develop an « aesthetic ethos, » turning life into an aesthetic ritual, a « life-style » (a nonsense phrase which came into the language in the 1960’s under Marcuse’s influence). With Marcuse representing the point of the wedge, the 1960’s were filled with obtuse intellectual justifications of contentless adolescent sexual rebellion. Eros and Civilization was reissued as an inexpensive paperback in 1961, and ran through several editions; in the preface to the 1966 edition, Marcuse added that the new slogan, « Make Love, Not War, » was exactly what he was talking about: « The fight for eros is a political fight [emphasis in original]. » In 1969, he noted that even the New Left’s obsessive use of obscenities in its manifestoes was part of the Great Refusal, calling it « a systematic linguistic rebellion, which smashes the ideological context in which the words are employed and defined. » Marcuse was aided by psychoanalyst Norman O. Brown, his OSS protege, who contributed Life Against Death in 1959, and Love’s Body in 1966—calling for man to shed his reasonable, « armored » ego, and replace it with a « Dionysian body ego, » that would embrace the instinctual reality of polymorphous perversity, and bring man back into « union with nature. » The books of Reich, who had claimed that Nazism was caused by monogamy, were re-issued. Reich had died in an American prison, jailed for taking money on the claim that cancer could be cured by rechanneling « orgone energy. » Primary education became dominated by Reich’s leading follower, A.S. Neill, a Theosophical cult member of the 1930’s and militant atheist, whose educational theories demanded that students be taught to rebel against teachers who are, by nature, authoritarian. Neill’s book Summerhill sold 24,000 copies in 1960, rising to 100,000 in 1968, and 2 million in 1970; by 1970, it was required reading in 600 university courses, making it one of the most influential education texts of the period, and still a benchmark for recent writers on the subject. Marcuse led the way for the complete revival of the rest of the Frankfurt School theorists, re-introducing the long-forgotten Lukacs to America. Marcuse himself became the lightning rod for attacks on the counterculture, and was regularly attacked by such sources as the Soviet daily Pravda, and then-California Governor Ronald Reagan. The only critique of any merit at the time, however, was one by Pope Paul VI, who in 1969 named Marcuse (an extraordinary step, as the Vatican usually refrains from formal denunciations of living individuals), along with Freud, for their justification of « disgusting and unbridled expressions of eroticism »; and called Marcuse’s theory of liberation, « the theory which opens the way for license cloaked as liberty … an aberration of instinct. » The eroticism of the counterculture meant much more than free love and a violent attack on the nuclear family. It also meant the legitimization of philosophical eros. People were trained to see themselves as objects, determined by their « natures. » The importance of the individual as a person gifted with the divine spark of creativity, and capable of acting upon all human civilization, was replaced by the idea that the person is important because he or she is black, or a woman, or feels homosexual impulses. This explains the deformation of the civil rights movement into a « black power » movement, and the transformation of the legitimate issue of civil rights for women into feminism. Discussion of women’s civil rights was forced into being just another « liberation cult, » complete with bra-burning and other, sometimes openly Astarte-style, rituals; a review of Kate Millet’s Sexual Politics (1970) and Germaine Greer’s The Female Eunuch (1971), demonstrates their complete reliance on Marcuse, Fromm, Reich, and other Freudian extremists.
The Bad Trip
This popularization of life as an erotic, pessimistic ritual did not abate, but in fact deepened over the twenty years leading to today; it is the basis of the horror we see around us. The heirs of Marcuse and Adorno completely dominate the universities, teaching their own students to replace reason with « Politically Correct » ritual exercises. There are very few theoretical books on arts, letters, or language published today in the United States or Europe which do not openly acknowledge their debt to the Frankfort School.
The witchhunt on today’s campuses is merely the implementation of Marcuse’s concept of « repressive toleration »— »tolerance for movements from the left, but intolerance for movements from the right »—enforced by the students of the Frankfurt School, now become the professors of women’s studies and Afro-American studies. The most erudite spokesman for Afro-American studies, for instance, Professor Cornell West of Princeton, publicly states that his theories are derived from Georg Lukacs. At the same time, the ugliness so carefully nurtured by the Frankfurt School pessimists, has corrupted our highest cultural endeavors. One can hardly find a performance of a Mozart opera, which has not been utterly deformed by a director who, following Benjamin and the I.S.R., wants to « liberate the erotic subtext. » You cannot ask an orchestra to perform Schönberg and Beethoven on the same program, and maintain its integrity for the latter. And, when our highest culture becomes impotent, popular culture becomes openly bestial. One final image: American and European children daily watch films like Nightmare on Elm Street and Total Recall, or television shows comparable to them. A typical scene in one of these will have a figure emerge from a television set; the skin of his face will realistically peel away to reveal a hideously deformed man with razor-blade fingers, fingers which start growing to several feet in length, and—suddenly—the victim is slashed to bloody ribbons. This is not entertainment. This is the deeply paranoid hallucination of the LSD acid head. The worst of what happened in the 1960’s is now daily fare. Owing to the Frankfurt School and its co-conspirators, the West is on a « bad trip » from which it is not being allowed to come down.
The principles through which Western Judeo-Christian civilization was built, are now no longer dominant in our society; they exist only as a kind of underground resistance movement. If that resistance is ultimately submerged, then the civilization will not survive—and, in our era of incurable pandemic disease and nuclear weapons, the collapse of Western civilization will very likely take the rest of the world with it to Hell.
The way out is to create a Renaissance. If that sounds grandiose, it is nonetheless what is needed. A renaissance means, to start again; to discard the evil, and inhuman, and just plain stupid, and to go back, hundreds or thousands of years, to the ideas which allow humanity to grow in freedom and goodness. Once we have identified those core beliefs, we can start to rebuild civilization.
Ultimately, a new Renaissance will rely on scientists, artists, and composers, but in the first moment, it depends on seemingly ordinary people who will defend the divine spark of reason in themselves, and tolerate no less in others. Given the successes of the Frankfurt School and its New Dark Age sponsors, these ordinary individuals, with their belief in reason and the difference between right and wrong, will be « unpopular. » But, no really good idea was ever popular, in the beginning.
An overwhelming amount of the philosophy and artifacts of the American counterculture of the 1960’s, plus the New Age nonsense of today, derives from a large-scale social experiment sited in Ascona, Switzerland from about 1910 to 1935. Originally a resort area for members of Helena Blavatsky’s Theosophy cult, the little Swiss village became the haven for every occult, leftist and racialist sect of the original New Age movement of the early twentieth century. By the end of World War I, Ascona was indistinguishable from what Haight-Ashbury would later become, filled with health food shops, occult book stores hawking the I Ching, and Naturmenschen, « Mr. Naturals » who would walk about in long hair, beads, sandals, and robes in order to « get back to nature. » The dominant influence in the area came from Dr. Otto Gross, a student of Freud and friend of Carl Jung, who had been part of Max Weber’s circle when Frankfurt School founder Lukacs was also a member. Gross took Bachofen to its logical extremes, and, in the words of a biographer, « is said to have adopted Babylon as his civilization, in opposition to that of Judeo-Christian Europe…. if Jezebel had not been defeated by Elijah, world history would have been different and better. Jezebel was Babylon, love religion, Astarte, Ashtoreth; by killing her, Jewish monotheistic moralism drove pleasure from the world. » Gross’s solution was to recreate the cult of Astarte in order to start a sexual revolution and destroy the bourgeois, patriarchal family. Among the members of his cult were: Frieda and D.H. Lawrence; Franz Kafka; Franz Werfel, the novelist who later came to Hollywood and wrote The Song of Bernadette; philosopher Martin Buber; Alma Mahler, the wife of composer Gustave Mahler, and later the liaison of Walter Gropius, Oskar Kokoschka, and Franz Werfel; among others. The Ordo Templis Orientalis (OTO), the occult fraternity set up by Satanist Aleister Crowley, had its only female lodge at Ascona. It is sobering to realize the number of intellectuals now worshipped as cultural heroes who were influenced by the New Age madness in Ascona—including almost all the authors who enjoyed a major revival in America in the 1960’s and 1970’s. The place and its philosophy figures highly in the works of not only Lawrence, Kafka and Werfel, but also Nobel Prize winners Gerhardt Hauptmann and Hermann Hesse, H.G. Wells, Max Brod, Stefan George, and the poets Rainer Maria Rilke and Gustav Landauer. In 1935 Ascona became the headquarters for Carl Jung’s annual Eranos Conference to popularize gnosticism. Ascona was also the place of creation for most of what we now call modern dance. It was headquarters to Rudolf von Laban, inventor of the most popular form of dance notation, and Mary Wigman. Isadora Duncan was a frequent visitor. Laban and Wigman, like Duncan, sought to replace the formal geometries of classical ballet with re-creations of cult dances which would be capable of ritualistically dredging up the primordial racial memories of the audience. When the Nazis came to power, Laban became the highest dance official in the Reich, and he and Wigman created the ritual dance program for the 1936 Olympic Games in Berlin—which was filmed by Hitler’s personal director Leni Reifenstahl, a former student of Wigman. The peculiar occult psychoanalysis popular in Ascona was also decisive in the development of much of modern art. The Dada movement originated in nearby Zurich, but all its early figures were Asconans in mind or body, especially Guillaume Apollinaire, who was a particular fan of Otto Gross. When « Berlin Dada » announced its creation in 1920, its opening manifesto was published in a magazine founded by Gross. The primary document of Surrealism also came from Ascona. Dr. Hans Prinzhorn, a Heidelberg psychiatrist, commuted to Ascona, where he was the lover of Mary Wigman. In 1922, he published a book, « The Artwork of the Mentally Ill, » based on paintings by his psychotic patients, accompanied by an analysis claiming that the creative process shown in this art was actually more liberated than that of the Old Masters. Prinzhorn’s book was widely read by the modern artists of the time, and a recent historian has called it, « the Bible of the Surrealists. »
The Frankfurt School’s original 1930’s survey work, including the « authoritarian personality, » was based on psychoanalytic categories developed by Erich Fromm. Fromm derived these categories from the theories of J.J. Bachofen, a collaborator of Nietzsche and Richard Wagner, who claimed that human civilization was originally « matriarchal. » This primoridial period of « gynocratic democracy » and dominance of the Magna Mater (Great Mother) cult, said Bachofen, was submerged by the development of rational, authoritarian « patriarchism, » including monotheistic religion. Later, Fromm utilized this theory to claim that support for the nuclear family was evidence of authoritarian tendencies.
In 1970, forty years after he first proclaimed the importance of Bachofen’s theory, the Frankfurt School’s Erich Fromm surveyed how far things had developed. He listed seven « social-psychological changes » which indicated the advance of matriarchism over patriarchism:
The Frankfurt School devised the « authoritarian personality » profile as a weapon to be used against its political enemies. The fraud rests on the assumption that a person’s actions are not important; rather, the issue is the psychological attitude of the actor—as determined by social scientists like those of the Frankfurt School. The concept is diametrically opposed to the idea of natural law and to the republican legal principles upon which the U.S. was founded; it is, in fact, fascistic, and identical to the idea of « thought crime, » as described by George Orwell in his 1984, and to the theory of « volitional crime » developed by Nazi judge Roland Freisler in the early 1930’s.
When the Frankfurt School was in its openly pro-Bolshevik phase, its authoritarian personality work was designed to identify people who were not sufficiently revolutionary, so that these people could be « re-educated. » When the Frankfurt School expanded its research after World War II at the behest of the American Jewish Committee and the Rockefeller Foundation, its purpose was not to identify anti-Semitism; that was merely a cover story. Its goal was to measure adherence to the core beliefs of Western Judeo-Christian civilization, so that these beliefs could be characterized as « authoritarian, » and discredited.
For the Frankfurt School conspirators, the worst crime was the belief that each individual was gifted with sovereign reason, which could enable him to determine what is right and wrong for the whole society; thus, to tell people that you have a reasonable idea to which they should conform, is authoritarian, paternalistic extremism.
By these standards, the judges of Socrates and Jesus were correct in condemning these two individuals (as, for example, I.F. Stone asserts in one case in his « Trial of Socrates. ») It is the measure of our own cultural collapse, that this definition of authoritarianism is acceptable to most citizens, and is freely used by political operations like the Anti-Defamation League and the Cult Awareness Network to « demonize » their political enemies.
When Lyndon LaRouche and six of his colleagues faced trial on trumped-up charges in 1988, LaRouche identified that the prosecution would rely on the Frankfurt School’s authoritarian personality fraud, to claim that the defendants’ intentions were inherently criminal. During the trial, LaRouche’s defense attorney attempted to demonstrate the Frankfurt School roots of the prosecution’s conspiracy theory, but he was overruled by Judge Albert Bryan, Jr., who said, « I’m not going back into the early 1930’s in opening statements or in the testimony of witnesses. »
The New Cult in Washington
From Robert Keith Spenser’s The Cult of the All-Seeing Eye, pp. 43-46.
A temple will be erected in
Washington, D. C., for « the citizen of the world » to develop
« universal understanding » in place of his « national limitations. »
Planners for this $5 million edifice, called « The Temple of
Understanding, » say endorsers include Swami Prabhavananda of the Vedanda
Society, Hollywood; Secretary of Defense Robert S. McNamara, Socialist leader Norman Thomas, Chester Bowles, special advisor to the
President; Swami Bhaskaranand Paramhamsa of « UNISM, » New Delhi,
India; Thomas B. Watson, president of International Business
Eleanor Roosevelt, the United Lodge of
Theosophists, New York City, and others.
The futuristic building, characterized as a « spiritual
UN » will be a « symbol of the brotherhood and sisterhood of
mankind, » according to the brochure issued from Temple
headquarters, Greenwich, Conn. A wing of this modern-day Tower of
Babel will be accorded to each of the six international faiths:
Hinduism, Judaism, Buddhism, Confucianism, Christianity and Islam.
AMONG OTHER endorsers listed are Jack Benny, Douglas MacArthur II,
ambassador to Japan; Max Lerner of the New York Post, Prof. J. B. Rhine
of Duke University; Roland Gammon of the Laymen’s Movement
and World Parliament of Religions; Miguel Ydigoras Fuentes, president of Guatemala; Sir Roy Welensky, prime minister, Federation of
Rhodesia and Nyasaland; Rev. Fred Jordan, president, International Spiritualists,
Norfolk, Va.; Philip S. Linnik, director Universal Brotherhood
Center, Glen Cove, Long Island, N. Y.; James A. Linen, president Time-Life Inc., and S. A.
Mohamed, cultural attache of the United Arab Republic, Washington,
A « world publicity campaign » for donations is being launched. The
names of the donors are to be enscribed on the stone walks of the
THE SYMBOLISM planned for the building dates back to the black
magic practised by the high priests of ancient Egypt. The building
will contain a giant eye — a circular pool of water which reflects
light beamed onto it by a dome faceted to resemble a many-colored
diamond. The Temple brochure
“The dome will be illuminated all night in order to
indicate, symbolically, that even while the world sleeps, the
light of understanding continues to shine.”
WHILE TEMPLE publicists proclaim the idea for the temple arose
quite spontaneously out of a talk between two woman friends,
shrines for « the brotherhood of man » have been systematically used
throughout history to create a mystique of collectivity.
Money was raised to build a similar shrine in London by the
occultist, the late Mrs. Annie Besant. A sort of Eleanor Roosevelt of her
day, Mrs. Besant worked closely with [Jawaharlal] Nehru and Krishna Menon
and was a founder of the Fabian Parliamentary League, a
British socialist group in which Sidney Webb, Hubert Land, H. H. Champion and Bernard Shaw were
MRS. BESANT’S temple featured six symbolic presentations of the six
great international faiths in the lecture hall. Visiting « adepts »
contemplated a mural of a six-pointed Theosophical star made of two
interlocking triangles connected by a serpent.
This theme is repeated in the « Temple of Understanding. » The
brochure informs us that the temple’s six wings « will contain the
cultural facets of the ‘diamond of truth.' »
IN NEW YORK the « Friends of the Meditation Room » have long met
regularly in the United Nations’ Meditation Room. In the center of
this shrine a beam of light plays of polished ore. On April 24,
1957, when the Meditation Room was reopened, the late Dag
Hammarskjold, UN Secretary General, described this pagan stone as
an altar to universal religion.
« The altar is the symbol of the God of all, » he said.
The Temple of Understanding also will have its meditation room, to
be known as the « Hall of Illumination. » There, it is planned that
the Illuminati, Masters of Wisdom, Our
Leaders of the Temple of Understanding, will train the public in
the new humanistic cult.
Meetings, film showings and courses of study in the world’s great
religions will be held in the « Hall of Illumination. »
IT IS INTERESTING to note that for some time now a group who call
themselves « the New Group of World
Servers » have been holding « full moon meditation meetings » at
the Carnegie Endowment International Centre in New York.
On Dec. 21, 1961, this writer attended one of these meetings where
pamphlets were distributed describing « the New World Religion. » One
World Goodwill » booklet described what some of the backers of
« The Temple of Understanding » may have in mind.
new type of mystic is coming to be recognized . . . he
distinguished by his lack of interest in his own brand of
WHERE THE internationalist would-be elite gather to plan and plot
world government I heard a determined group of « World Servers » led
by Foster Bailey
chant in unison their eerie Great Invocation.
“Let purpose guide the little wills of men—
“The purpose which the Masters know and serve.”
Is the real purpose of the world-minded Masters of Unism to guide
and control us by pagan rites?
Unwrapping her gauzy veils a « White Madonna » danced on
the podium. She symbolized « Christianity » or the « Mother of the
World encompassing forms of the creative feminine spirit which has
unfolded over the centuries from Egypt, Babylonia, China and
Europe, » said a program distribute at the Temple of Understanding’s
The dinner, held Oct. 12 at the Waldorf Astoria, featured this dramatic skit on
« Christianity » and five other skits on the major faiths to
commemorative $5,000,000 Temple to be built on 50 acres by the
Potomac River, Washington, D. C.
The Temple brochure describes the edifice as a « Spiritual United
Nations » designed to fulfill the rituals of the six major faiths and
replace « nationalist limitations » with « universal understanding »
for « citizens of the world! »
PUBLICISTS for this tax-exempt « Project Understanding » claim
support from the « pennies donated by hairdressers, taxicab drivers
and workers all over the world. » But judging from the Temple’s
printed list of sponsors it can count on more influential backing.
John D. Rockefeller IV, Socialist leader Norman Thomas, Rt. Rev. James A. Pike of San
Francisco, Cary Grant, Defense Secretary Robert S. McNamara, a
founding member of the Fund for the Republic’s Center for
Democratic Institutions; militant pacifist and Nobel Peace Prize
and Nobel Peace Prize winner Philip Noel Baker; Holland D. Roberts of the Academic
Freedom Committee, a former head of the Communist party’s
California Labor School who was identified as a « party member » at a
Jan. 22, 1956 hearing of the Subversive Activities Control Board;
U. Alexis Johnson, depute undersecretary of state for political
affairs; Sen. Kenneth B. Keating (R-N.Y.), Prof. Pitirim A.
Sorokin, director of Harvard University’s Research Center for
Creative Altruism and Brooks Hays, special assistant to President
AT THE WALDORF’S Starlight Roof I heard Mrs. Dickerman Hollister, president of the Temple of
Understanding (P. O. Box 191, Greenwich, Conn.), address some 500
UN delegates and socialites. In a voice choked with fervor, she
“We are sending an idea to create a global symbol of the
Then she struck with a wand an egg held aloft by a child. Out
popped a « magic » golden tree with six branches on either side.
THE SYMBOLISM is not surprising in view of the mystic appeal of the
internationalist dream. For example, one of the Temple sponsors is
Roland Gammond, former director of the Laymen’s Movement, World
Parliament of Religions. This international, non-sectarian group of
big businessmen, psychiatrists and other professional men meet in
the seclusion of Wainwright House, Milton Point, Rye, N. Y., to study
scientific mind control.
I secured the texts of some of the Wainwright House seminars which
treat of such topics as « clairvoyance, » « automatic writing, »
« hallucinations, » « religion as part of an enlarged science » and
« the psychic content of the alchemical symbols. »
According to this year’s Sept.-Oct. issue of the Laymen’s Review
published at Wainwright House, the Movement « spearheaded » the
establishment of the UN Meditations Room which happens to contain
some of those « alchemical symbols. »
THE UN MEDITATION Room mural is divided into 72
separate sections—the tetragrammaton or Divine Name of 72
words. It depicts triangles and pyramids representing « the deity »
in accordance with the ancient Babylonian symbols. Also a part of
this mural is a spiral figure intertwined with a diagonal line
which may represent Hermes’ wand, the Cadeuces, traditional symbol of the sex forces or
The mural’s center sphere and outer circle roughly form an eye. The
« all seeing eye » of the deity theme is to be repeated in the
Temple building by a glass eye faceted like a diamond to reflect
the rays of the sun through the six wings.
IT IS INTERESTING to note that the Interparliamentary
Union—Temple of Understanding sponsor Sen. Keating is IPU
secretary—adopted a few weeks ago as its emblem: « A Temple of
Law with six columns for the six continents to show the
Universality of the Union. » The IPU, which has been financed in
part by the tax-exempt Carnegie Endowment for International Peace,
consists of a training corps of legislators who meet regularly with
their Communist « counterparts » to set up a world parliamentary
WHILE SOME PEOPLE may dismiss these humanistic temples as another
example of « goofy » internationalism, apologists for Moscow view
them as a serious component in their drive to promote the « Social
TWO TEMPLE sponsors are included in the Senate Internal Security’s
« list of the most typical sponsors of front organizations »
published April 23, 1956. They are:
Prof. Kirtley Mather of the Geologic Museum, Cambridge, Mass.,
who has served on a four-man panel evaluating « physical research »
at Wainwright House.
ANOTHER TEMPLE backer is Rev. Lee H. Ball,
executive secretary of the Methodist Federation for Social Action,
an organization cited as a front by the Senate Internal Security
Subcommittee on April 23, 1956. On July 7, 1953, Ben Gitlow, former
secretary of the Communist party, testified under oath that Ball
was one of « the principle individuals involved in the Communist
conspiracy to subvert the church for Communist purposes. »
Shouldn’t they add the hammer and sickle symbol to the second « Meditation Room » slated for the new
CONFERENCE Occultisme et Contre-Cultures 1
CONFERENCE Nazisme et Occultisme Mythes Histoires 1CONFERENCE Nazisme et Occultisme Mythes Histoires 2
David Rockefeller « Nous sommes reconnaissants au Washington Post, au New York Times, Time Magazine et d’autres grandes publications dont les directeurs ont assisté à nos réunions et respecté leurs promesses de discrétion depuis presque 40 ans. Il nous aurait été impossible de développer nos plans pour le monde si nous avions été assujettis à l’exposition publique durant toutes ces années. Mais le monde est maintenant plus sophistiqué et préparé à entrer dans un gouvernement mondial. La souveraineté supranationale d’une élite intellectuelle et de banquiers mondiaux est assurément préférable à l’autodétermination nationale pratiquée dans les siècles passés. »Discours à la Commission Trilatérale, Juin 1991, Baden-Baden, Allemagne
Si vous percevez la main du diable sous les évènements actuels, vous êtes peut-être plus près de la vérité que vous ne le croyez.
Une femme qui a été élevée dans le culte des Illuminati décrit une puissante organisation secrète constituée d’environ 1% de la population des États-Unis qui a infiltré toutes les institutions sociales et qui prépare une prise de pouvoir militaire. Ses révélations mettent la guerre au terrorisme (« War on Terror ») et la sécurité intérieure (« Homeland Security ») dans une nouvelle perspective.
« Svali » est le pseudonyme d’une femme, âgée de 45 ans, qui était « programmeuse de l’esprit » pour le culte jusqu’en 1996. Elle était la sixième chef entraîneure de la branche de San Diego et dirigeait plus de 30 entraîneurs qui se rapportait à elle. Elle a risquée sa vie pour avertir l’humanité des plans et du pouvoir couvert des Illuminati.
Elle décrit un culte Satanique sadique mené par les individus les plus riches et les plus puissant du monde. Le culte est largement homosexuel et pédophile, et on y pratique des sacrifice d’animaux et des meurtres rituels. Il fonctionne « main dans la main » avec la CIA et la Franc-Maçonnerie. Il est suprématiste Arien (l’Allemand est parlé au sommet), mais les Juifs apostasiés y sont bienvenue. Il contrôle le trafic mondial de drogues, d’armes, de pornographie et de prostitution. Il pourrait être derrière des assassinats politiques et du « terrorisme », incluant le 11 septembre 2001, le tireur du Maryland, et l’attentat à la bombe de Bali.
Le culte a infiltré le gouvernement au niveau local, régional et national; les institutions financières et scolaires; la religion et les médias. Basé en Europe, il planifie un « Ordre Mondial » qui fera ressembler ses tentatives précédentes, le nazisme et le communisme, à un pique-nique. Un autre détail: ces gens ne sont pas très heureux.
Le témoignage courageux de Svali explique pourquoi on n’enseigne plus aux enfants les valeurs civiques, pourquoi ils sont habitués à l’homosexualité et à la violence, et pourquoi notre « culture » descend dans le nihilisme et la dépravation sexuelle. Il soulève la possibilité que George W. Bush et son Administration soient Illuministes, et suggère qu’une partie de « l’élite » mondiale puisse être engagée dans une épouvantable conspiration criminelle.
En mars 2000, Svali a commencé à écrire un éditorial mensuel pour les survivants des rituels Illuminati sur le site Suite101.com. (www.suite101.com/articles.cfm/ritual_abuse)[Anglais] En Décembre 2000, H.J. Springer, l’éditeur de CentrExNews.com a contacté Svali et a réalisé un interview étendu de 18 parties avec elle par courriel, d’ailleurs en ligne sous licence.
« Je suis convaincu qu’elle dit vrai », m’a écrit Springer [« I am convinced she is the Real McCoy »]. « Je lui ai personnellement relayé plusieurs courriels en provenance de d’autres membres abusés rituellement, victimes de lavage de cerveau, violés, des gens maltraités sexuellement, nommez-les…et certains m’ont confirmé son histoire. Alors je n’ai absolument aucun doute que Svali a fait partie des Illuminati depuis son enfance. »
« Je fais confiance au témoignage de Svali également parce qu’il confirme mes intuitions et mes recherches. Tout coïncide : de la main de la mort qui semble supprimer l’humanité, à pourquoi Clinton a donné de la technologie secrète aux Chinois, jusqu’à la présence de camps de concentration aux États-Unis. Il explique pourquoi certaines personnes que je connais se comportent de façon conspirationiste. Je remercie Slavi de m’avoir donné une effrayante mais incroyable clé pour comprendre le monde. »
Un ami m’a averti de rester sceptique d’une possible arnaque et m’a offert de l’aide pour confirmer l’histoire personnelle de Slavi. J’ai accepté son offre. Je vous incite fortement à lire son témoignage en entier et de vous faire un opinion personnel. Lisez de « Part One » à « Part 18 » en premier, en commençant au milieu de la liste pour monter.
Avec sa permission, voici des extraits de la correspondance de Slavi avec H.J. Springer de CentrExnews.com. J’ai aussi inclus du matériel de son article « Est-ce que les Illuminati sont en train de prendre possession du monde? » (« Are the Illuminati taking over the world? » –www.suite101.com/article.cfm/ritual_abuse/53556)[Anglais]
Une Présence Intrusive
Svali: « Les Illuminati sont présent dans chacun des centres métropolitains majeurs aux États-Unis. Les Illuminati croient aux contrôles des lieux par:
-ses banques et ses institutions financières : devinez combien siègent dans les conseils d’administration? vous seriez surpris
-les gouvernement locaux : devinez combien sont élus au conseil municipal?
-la loi : les enfants sont encouragés à faire carrière en justice et en médecine
-les médias : d’autres sont encouragés à faire carrière en journalisme, et les membres aident à financer les journaux locaux. »
Svali: « Les Illuminati sont un groupe qui pratique une forme de croyance connue comme « l’illumination » (« enlightenment »). C’est Luciférien, et ils apprennent à leurs disciples que leurs racines remontent aux anciennes religions mystérieuses de Babylone, de l’Égypte et du druidisme Celtique. Ils ont pris ce qu’ils considèrent « le meilleur » de chacun, les pratiques fondamentales, et les ont regroupé ensemble dans une discipline fortement occulte. Plusieurs groupes au niveau local vénèrent d’anciennes divinités comme « El », « Baal » et « Ashtarte » de même que « Isis et Osiris » et « Set » …Je sais que ces personnes enseignent et pratiquent le mal. »
Svali : « Weishaupt n’a pas créer les Illuminati, ils l’ont choisi comme représentant et lui ont dit à propos de quoi il devait écrire. Les financiers, datant des banquiers de l’époque des Chevaliers des Templiers (Templar Knights) qui ont financé les premiers rois d’Europe, ont créé les Illuminati. Weishapt était leur « porte étendard », celui qui faisait leurs transactions. »
Prise De Contrôle Militaire
Svali : « Brièvement, chaque région des États-Unis a des « centres nerveux » ou puissantes bases pour l’activité régionale. Les États-Unis ont été divisés en sept régions géographiques majeures. Dans chaque région se trouvent plusieurs localités qui contiennent des complexes militaires et des bases cachés en retrait, en région isolés ou sur de grands domaines privés.
Ces bases sont utilisées de façon intermittente pour enseigner aux Illuminati générationnels (de génération en génération) et les entraîner aux techniques militaires, au combat à main nue, au contrôle des foules, à l’utilisation d’armes et à tout les aspect de la guerre en général. Pourquoi? Parce que les Illuministes croient que le gouvernement, tel que nous le connaissons, aussi bien que celui de la plupart des nations du monde, est destiné à s’effondrer. Ce sera des effondrements planifiés, qui se produiront de la façon suivante:
Les Illuminati ont d’abord planifié un écroulement financier qui fera ressembler la grande dépression à un pique-nique. Cela se produira par les manœuvres des grandes banques et des institutions financières du monde, à travers la manipulation d’actions et les fluctuations des taux d’intérêt. La plupart des gens seront endettés envers le gouvernement fédéral par les banques, les cartes de crédit, etc. Les gouvernements rappelleront tous les prêts immédiatement, mais comme la plupart des gens seront dans l’impossibilité de rembourser ils seront mis en faillite. Ceci causera un panique financière généralisé, qui se produira simultanément dans tous les pays, puisque les Illuministes croient fermement au contrôle des gens par les finances.
Ça ne semble pas très plaisant, n’est-ce pas? Je ne connais pas le calendrier exact de tous ces évènements, et ne veux même pas tenter de le deviner. La bonne nouvelle est que si un individu n’a pas de dette, ne doit rien au gouvernement ou n’a pas de carte de crédit, et peut vivre en s’autosuffisant, il pourrait s’en sortir mieux qu’un autre. J’investirais dans l’or, pas dans la bourse, si j’avais les revenus. L’or sera de nouveau le standard mondial, et les dollars seront rendus inutiles (souvenez-vous après la guerre civile? Notre argent vaudra la même chose que celui des confédérés après l’effondrement).
Ensuite, il y aura une prise de contrôle militaire, région par région, à mesure que le gouvernement déclare l’état d’urgence et la loi martiale. Les gens seront en panique, ce sera l’anarchie dans la plupart de localités, et le gouvernement justifiera ses actions comme étant nécessaires au contrôle des citoyens paniqués. Les dirigeants militaires entraînés par le culte et les gens sous leur direction utiliseront les armes aussi bien que les techniques de contrôle des foules pour implémenter le nouvel état des choses. … Des bases militaires seront installés, dans chaque localité (actuellement, elles y sont déjà, mais sont cachées). Dans les prochaines années, elle seront au dessus de la terre et seront révélés. Chaque localité aura des bases régionales et des dirigeants à qui ils se rapportent. La hiérarchie sera très semblable à leur hiérarchie cachée actuelle.
Il y environ cinq ans, quand j’ai quitté les Illuminati, approximativement 1% de la population des États-Unis faisait soit parti des Illuminati, sympathiques à leur cause, ou victime de contrôle de l’esprit (et sont donc considérés utilisables). Même si cela peut sembler peu, imaginez 1% de la population fortement entraînée à l’utilisation d’armement, au contrôle des foules, à différentes techniques de comportement et de psychologie, fortement armés et reliés à des groupes paramilitaire. »
« Leadership »
Svali : « Le conseil national est constitué de banquiers influents qui possèdent du VIEIL argent tel que : les Rockefellers, la famille Mellon, la famille Carneige, la famille Rothschild, etc. Je sais que je ne devrais pas nommer de nom mais je le fais tout de même.
Le « Conseil Supérieur Mondial » (« Supreme World Concil ») est déjà installé comme un prototype de ce qui décidera lorsque le Nouvel Ordre Mondial (NWO) prendra place. Il se réunit sur une base régulière pour discuter finances, direction, politiques, etc. et des difficultés à résoudre certains problèmes qui surviennent. Encore une fois, ces dirigeants sont à la tête du monde financier, du VIEIL argent bancaire. La famille Rothschild, en Angleterre et en France, possède des sièges dominants. Un descendant de la dynastie Hapsburg a un siège générationnel. Un descendant des familles dirigeantes d’Angleterre et de France possède aussi un siège générationnel. La famille Rockefeller aux États-Unis détient un siège.
C’est une des raisons pourquoi les Illuminati ont étés presque « intouchables » pendant toutes ces années. Les membres dominants sont très, très, très riches et puissants. J’espère que cette information sera d’une certaine aide. Comment je sais tout ça? J’étais sur un conseil de « leadership » local (comme entraîneur-chef), mais j’ai aussi parlé à ceux du régional. Aussi, on apprend à chaque enfant Illuminati qui sont leurs dirigeants, et on leur demande de prêter serment d’allégeance à ces derniers et au « Nouvel Ordre à venir ». »
Svali : « La direction des Illuminati affirme descendre de sang royal, ainsi que d’un héritage occulte continu. Vous voyez, il y a deux définitions du mot « royauté »(« royalty »). La royauté comme on la voit actuellement, et une « royauté cachée » de descendance royale et de pouvoirs très occultes. A certaines occasions, les deux étaient en concurrence, comme pour le Prince De Galles (Prince Of Whales).
Je n’ai jamais vraiment réfléchi à quel pays/ligné détenait le plus de pouvoir, puisque je n’étais qu’un exécutant fortement occupé à la tâche. Mais ma compréhension était: Les descendants Hanoverian/Hapsburg dominent en Allemagne sur les Bruderheist. Ils sont considérés comme une des plus fortes lignés pour l’occulte également. La lignée Anglaise est juste sous eux, avec la famille royale. Définitivement, il dominent la branche du Royaume-Uni sous les Rothschilds dans le monde de l’occulte, même si le parlement dirige publiquement le pays. En France, encore, les descendants des familles royales sont encore dans le royaume de l’occulte, mais les Rothschilds Français les dominent tous. »
Le rang des États-Unis
Svali : « Les États-Unis sont considérés inférieurs, et plus jeunes que les branches Européennes. … L’Allemagne, la France et le Royaume-Uni, forment un trio décisionnel unilatéral (triumvirate) qui domine dans le culte Européen. La Russie est considérée importante, et possède les groupes militaires les plus forts. La Russie a obtenu la quatrième position dans le Nouvel Ordre Mondial, AVANT le rôle de États-Unis, parce que la nation à été plus engagée et coopérative au cours des années à faire avancer la cause.
Les descendants des anciennes familles dirigeantes de là-bas, sont aussi membre du contrôle occulte, tout comme ceux des nouvelles. Il n’y a pas de Marxisme dans le culte. La Chine est classée après la Russie, et ensuite les É-U. Mais beaucoup du pouvoir actuel Américain sera en Europe quand le changement surviendra, et plusieurs ont des maisons là-bas. Ils « changeront de nationalité » de nuit, comme ils étaient. C’est le peu que je me souvienne. J’aurais aimé être meilleur étudiant de tout ça, mais j’étais très occupée à rester en vie quand j’y étais.
La Russie sera la base militaire et la réserve du groupe, puisque leur dirigeants militaires (Illuministes) sont considérés les meilleurs au monde, et très, très disciplinés. La Chine à cause de ses racines dans l’occultisme oriental, et de son énorme population, sera considérée une puissance supérieure aux États-Unis. Mais encore, le vrai pouvoir résidera en Europe, d’après ce que j’ai appris quand je faisais partie du groupe. »
L’Organisation des Nations Unies
Svali : « L’ONU à été créé plus tôt dans ce siècle pour aider à surmonter la plus grosse barrière au gouvernement mondial. …Cette barrière est celle du nationalisme, ou de la fierté de chacun en son pays. C’est pourquoi ce ne fut PAS un concept populaire quand il fut introduit, et cela pris des années d’attaques envers les pays (country bashing) dans les médias et la destruction de tout sens de fierté nationale par une (pas si subtile) campagne médiatique. Les Nations-Unis sont une préparation, mais n’est pas le vrai pouvoir dans le monde, et sera relativement accessoire quand le Nouvel Ordre Mondial prendra place. Le vrai conseil sera alors annoncé. Mais comme façon d’amener le publique en général à accepter l’idée d’une « communauté globale » et d’une « communauté mondiale », l’ONU est une pierre angulaire de leur travail vers le NOM. »
Svali : « Le conflit au Moyen-Orient est tout à l’avantage des Illuministes. Ils DÉTESTENT Israël, espèrent de le voir un jour détruit, et spéculent sur le moment. Une des branches d’olivier offert par l’ONU lors de sa prise de pouvoir est de prévenir la guerre au Moyen-Orient, ce qui sera applaudi par plusieurs.
Mais au même moment, les Illuminati financent et fournissent secrètement des armes aux DEUX parti pour alimenter le conflit. Ce sont des gens très manipulateurs. Ils acheminaient des armes à travers la Russie à la Palestine, par exemple, pour promouvoir « l’amitié » entre la Russie et cet état, tout comme d’autres nations Arabes. Ensuite, les Illuministes Américains en acheminent en Israël, pour les mêmes raisons.
Ces gens aiment le jeu d’échec, et voient la guerre entre nations comme créant de l’ordre dans le chaos. La Russie deviendra plus forte encore. Elle possède une puissance militaire trop forte, à la fois connue et couverte (TOUS les entraîneurs militaires Illuminati doivent visiter la Russie pour apprendre d’eux), pour rester silencieusement sur le coté. Dans un Nouvel Ordre Mondial, ils seront plus fort que nous. »
Est-ce que les Illuminati est une conspiration juive?
Svali : « Absolument pas. En fait, Hitler et son personnel (spécialement Himmler et Goebbels) étaient de grands Illuministes.
Les Illuminati sont racistes à l’extrême, et comme enfant, j’ai été forcée à jouer au « camp de concentration » sur ma ferme en Virginie, et aussi en Europe dans des camps isolés en Allemagne.
Les Juifs se sont historiquement battus contre l’occulte (voir le Deutéronome, l’Ancien Testament pour savoir comment Dieu, à travers le peuple juif, à essayer de nettoyer le monde des groupes occultes qui y opéraient, comme ceux qui vénéraient Baal, Ashtarte, et d’autres dieux Canaanite et Babyloniens.). »
(D’un courriel envoyer à Henry Makow) « Oui, Il y a des très puissants Juifs dans ce groupe. Par exemple, la famille Rothschild dirigent littéralement l’empire financier en Europe (et indirectement les États-Unis), et est une famille Juive bien connue. J’ai aussi connue des gens dont les parents étaient de riches marchands de diamants Juifs dans le groupe, et à tous les niveaux. Mais pour monter dans le pouvoir des Illuminati, une personne Juive sera clandestinement forcée à renoncer à ses croyances, et à donner son allégeance première à Lucifer et aux croyances des Illuminati. En échange de cette trahison, ils croient que la pouvoir (financier) et les récompenses abondent; et dans un certain sens c’est vrai, mais à un prix trop élevé (perdre leur âme éternelle).
La mentalité Nazi/camp de concentration est très forte, dure, et je me suis fait dire que Hitler, Himmler, Goebel et d’autres étaient des membres Allemands hauts-placés dans le groupe (Himmler était un supérieur des deux autres), et Mengele leur marionnette payée, qui a plus tard travailler comme un entraîneur de haut niveau pour la branche Américaine entre les périodes où il se cachait en Amérique du Sud. Ils croyaient honnêtement qu’ils agissaient en tant qu’agents de leurs « dieux » pour exterminer la race Juive, et je suis tellement désolée que ce groupe ait perpétré tant d’horreur sur la terre (et tellement fière de l’avoir quitté).
J’espère que ceci vous aidera. Je me suis toujours demandée, par contre, pourquoi certaines des familles les plus hautement cotés financièrement du groupe (le baron Rothschild de France est un des 13 seigneur Européen, ou « rois » qui mènent le groupe en Europe, et siège au Conseil Mondial) sont Juifs, et que malgré tout ils prônent la haine envers leur propre race. »
Svali : « Plusieurs Illuministes ont des programmations du « Quatrième Reich » à l’intérieur… Les Illuminati sont racistes, et ont une apparence très « Aryenne ». Ils croient fermement à la règle du « pur » et « intelligent » selon leurs définitions, et occasionnellement des gens de minorités seront tués lors de leurs cérémonies.
Ils essaient de « produire » une race « génétiquement supérieure » pour régner, avec leurs enfants et descendants. Ils sont aussi disciples de la République de Platon, et croient qu’ils seront précurseurs de cette politique « Utopique » du Nouvel Ordre Mondial. Dans leur Utopie, les décideurs (« intelligentsia ») régneront, et les masses comme des moutons suivront leurs dirigeants (c’est leur vision du monde; que les dirigeants occultes sont « illuminés » et intelligent, alors que l’individu moyen est un « mouton » qui doit être mené par le bout du nez). »
Svali: « Les Franc-Maçons et les Iluminati sont comme les doigts d’une main. Je me fiche de piller sur certains pieds, mais c’est un fait. Le temple Maçonnique à Alexandrie, Virginie (la ville elle-même fût nommée en référence à Alexandrie, Égypte, et est un centre nerveux des activités Illuminati) est un centre dans la région de Washington, DC pour l’étude et l’apprentissage. J’y ai été amenée à intervalle pour des tests, pour graduer d’un niveau, pour étudier et pour de hautes cérémonies. Les dirigeants de ce groupe Maçonnique étaient aussi Illuministes.
Ceci est vrai pour toutes les grandes villes où j’ai vécu. Les chefs Franc-Maçons étaient aussi chefs Illuministes. Mes grands-parents maternels étaient tous deux des Maçons hauts placés dans la ville de Pittsburgh, Pennsylvanie (président de l’Etoile de l’Est (« Eastern Star ») et maçon de 33ième degré) et tous deux étaient aussi dirigeants des Illuminati dans cette région.
Est-ce que tous les maçons sont des Illuminatis? Non, spécialement aux niveau inférieurs, je crois qu’ils ne sont pas au courrant des pratiques qui prennent place la nuit dans les plus grands temples. Plusieurs sont probablement de bons hommes d’affaires et de bons Chrétiens. Mais je n’ai jamais connu un 32ième degré et plus qui n’était pas Illuminati, et le groupe à aider à promouvoir la Franc-Maçonnerie comme une « façade » pour leur activités. »
La CIA, le FBI sont tous infiltrés. Comme les Mormons, etc.
Svali: « Plusieurs des directeurs au FBI sont aussi Illuministes. La CIA a aider à rapatrier les scientifiques Allemands après la deuxième guerre mondiale. Plusieurs d’entre eux étaient aussi des dirigeant illuministes dans leur pays, et ont étés accueillis à bras ouvert par les groupes Américains. Ils acheminaient toutes les informations qu’ils découvraient aux Illuminati. Les Mormons se sont affiliés il y a plusieurs années dans une rencontre avec le pouvoir Illuminati dans les années 50. Il en va de même pour les Témoins de Jéhovah.
La Guerre Froide
Svali: « La Russie n’a jamais vraiment été une menace pour nous. Le Marxisme a été fondé par les Illuminati, et adopté comme un contre-balance au capitalisme. Les Illuminati croient fortement au balancement des forces opposées, de l’attraction entre les opposés. Ils voient l’histoire comme une partie d’échec complexe, et ils financeront un parti, puis l’autre, ultimement jusqu’à supprimer du chaos et de la division … ils rient parce qu’ils sont au dessus des partis politiques. Un grand financier occidental rencontrera secrètement un « adversaire » Russe pendant ces années, et ont bien rit de comment les « moutons » ont été trompés. Je partage ici ce qu’on ma dit, et aussi ce que j’ai observé.
Ils sont vraiment un groupe international, et leur agenda a cours sur tous les sentiments nationalistes. Il y a aussi beaucoup d’échange de personnel entre nations. Un entraîneur Russe peut venir aux États-Unis un moment, compléter un travail, et retourner, ou vice-versa. »
Entraîner des Assassins
Svali: « Voici comment ils font (comment ils ont fait pour moi):
 Quand l’enfant a 2 ans , placez le dans une cage reliée à des électrodes. Électrocutez l’enfant sévèrement.
 Sortez l’enfant, et mettez un chaton dans ses mains. Dites à l’enfant de tordre le cou du chat. L’enfant pleurera et refusera.
 Remettez l’enfant dans la cage, et électrocutez-le jusqu’à ce qu’il soit confus, et incapable de crier.
Sortez l’enfant, et redites-lui de briser le cou du chaton. Cette fois l’enfant tremblera, pleurera, mais le fera, effrayé par la torture. L’enfant ira ensuite dans un coin et vomira, pendant que les adultes le félicite d’avoir « fait du beau travail ».
C’est la première étape. Les animaux sont de plus en plus gros au fur et à mesure que l’enfant vieilli. Ils seront forcé à tuer un enfant éventuellement, soit fabriqué virtuellement, ou dans la réalité. On leur enseignera dès l’âge de neuf ans à assembler un fusil, à viser, et à tirer sur des cibles et sur demande. Ils pratiqueront ensuite sur des mannequins réalistes. Ensuite, ils pratiqueront sur des animaux. Ensuite, ils pratiqueront sur des « extensibles » ou en Réalité Virtuelle. Ils seront louangés s’ils réussissent bien , et torturés s’ils ne se conforment pas.
Plus l’enfant ou l’adolescent est vieux, plus l’entraînement est avancé. A 15 ans, la plupart des enfants seront forcés de se battre à main nues devant des spectateurs (des gens importants qui viennent regarder les « jeux », comme les gladiateurs de l’époque). Ces parties sont rarement jouées jusqu’à la mort, habituellement jusqu’à ce qu’un des enfants s’écroule. Ils utilisent tous les types d’armes imaginables et apprennent à se battre pour leur vie. Si un enfant perd une bagarre, il est fortement puni par son entraîneur, qui « perd la face ». S’il gagne, ils sont encore une fois félicités pour êtres « forts » et habiles avec les armes. Lorsqu’ils atteignent 21 ans, ce sont des machines à tuer entraînées avec des codes de commande pour tuer, et ils ont étés testés encore et encore pour prouver qu’ils obéiront bien. C’est comme ça que les Illuminati Allemands sont élevés, j’y suis passé moi-même. »
Confiance en la Famille
Svali: « Ils disent à leurs enfants pendant qu’ils les torturent: « Je fais tout cela parce que je t’aime ». Pour eux, la plus grande preuve d’amour est d’élever un enfant pour qu’ils soit fort et aspire à monter dans l’organisation, peu importe ce que cela prend.
Si un dirigeant voit un enfant, et le veux comme prostitué, les parents aimants vont le laisser partir, content que leur enfant monte en statut. Aussi, encore, voit-ils la trahison comme la plus grande valeur. Ils feront mise en scène par dessus mise en scène pour apprendre à leurs enfants à ne jamais faire confiance aux autres.
Je me souviens de centaines de coups agonisants et de trahisons, et d’avoir entendu quand j’étais trahie ou blessée: « Et ainsi est le cœur de l’homme ». Ceux qui me faisaient cela pensaient qu’ils m’apprenaient quelque chose de valeur, qui pourrait m’aider. Et à cause de la nature vicieuse et politique du groupe, dans un sens ils avaient raison; les naïfs se font marcher dessus et blesser. J’ai connu des parents qui voulaient épargner tout à leurs enfants par amour, mais souvent ils étaient raisonnés par d’autres membres de la famille, qui voyaient ces parents comme « faibles » et « indignes » d’élever leurs enfants. »
Svali: « La plupart d’entre eux sont des victimes abusées et blessées, qui ne réalisent pas qu’il est possible de sortir du groupe. Il y a beaucoup de gens mécontents dans les rangs, et il y aurait un exode massif si les membres croyaient qu’il était vraiment possible de sortir (et de vivre). Beaucoup d’entraîneurs que je connais (je connais des gens dérangés, qui torturent et qui sont pédophiles) n’étaient PAS fiers de ce qu’ils avait fait. Ils soupiraient silencieusement, ou jetaient un regard, pour montrer qu’ils n’approuvaient pas ce qu’ils avaient à faire. Mais ils se résignaient à faire leur travail, dans l’espoir d’avancement.
Voulez-vous connaître un des plus gros appât offert à ceux qui avancent dans le groupe? Qu’ils n’auront plus à faire mal aux gens, et qu’ils ne pourront plus êtres abusés (c’est vrai: seul ceux plus haut que vous dans le groupe peuvent abuser de vous, alors tous le monde veut monter, où le bassin de candidats devient plus petit). Bien sûr, les gens peuvent choisir d’abuser de n’importe qui en dessous d’eux, ce qui motive.
Les Illuminati sont un groupe très politique et traître, la mentalité du plus fort (« dog eat dog »); tout le monde veut progresser. Ce ne sont pas des gens gentils et ils ont l’habitude de manipuler les autres vicieusement. ILs ne voient que le statut, le pouvoir et l’argent.
Ils ne présentent jamais publiquement leurs préoccupations, ou les activités du cultes, et en sont souvent amnésiques. Ils sont des « chrétiens » biens respectés qui font figurent de chefs d’entreprise dans la communauté. L’image dans la communauté est toute-importante pour un Illuministe; ils feraient n’importe quoi pour maintenir une façade normale et respectée, et dédaigne s’exposer de façon véridique. …
Aucun des Illuministes que j’ai connu n’avaient d’apparence désagréable ou méchante dans leur vie de jour, même si certain étaient dysfonctionnels, comme des alcooliques. La dissociation qui conduit les Illuministes est leur meilleure couverture… Plusieurs, sinon la plupart de ces gens sont complètement inconscient du diabolisme dans lequel ils sont impliqués, pendant la nuit. »
Aussi, vous souvenez-vous des études qui établissaient que « la violence télévisuelle n’affecte pas le comportement des enfants, il y a plusieurs années? Devinez qui les a financés? Ce sont des tas fabrications. Ce qu’une personne regarde A de l’influence sur eux, et ceci est bien connu des spécialistes en comportement du groupe. En fait, ils savent que la télé est un outil qu’ils utilisent volontairement pour influencer « les masses ». Cela ne peut créer un changement total de personnalité sur le citoyen moyen, mais peut nous désensibiliser graduellement à la violence, à la pornographie et à l’occulte, et à influencer les perceptions des jeunes enfants.
La Musique Rock
Je pense que Britney SpearsEminem et d’autres sont utilisés par eux pour chanter des paroles qu’ils aiment (avez-vous déjà remarqué qu’il arbore un look Néo-Nazi et chante des paroles haineuses? Ce n’est PAS par hasard). En fait, beaucoup des grands chanteurs pop proviennent d’un internat avec le « club de Mickey Mouse(eh oui, ce bon vieux Walt était de l’empire Illuminati) et je crois qu’on leur offre le vedettariat en échange de leur allégeance ou d’un contrôle de l’esprit.
Combien de paroles défendent le suicide, la violence, le désespoir ou la spiritualité « Nouvel Age dans le pop/rock de nos jours? Ou obtenez une copie des paroles et lisez-les (mais soyez avertis que plusieurs sont possiblement déclencheurs pour des survivants du contrôle de l’esprit). »
Les Faiblesses Illuminati
Svali: » 1. Leur arrogance (je pense déjà l’avoir mentionné) est leur faiblesse. Ces gens croient qu’ils sont intouchables, et cela pourrait les rendrent nonchalants.
2. Si,par miracle, assez de gens prenaient cela AU SERIEUX et commençaient à s’organiser de façon à arrêter la prise de contrôle Illuminati, avec des prières et la guidance de Dieu, peut-être pourraient-ils êtres arrêtés. Je le souhaite, de tout mon cœur.
3. Arrêter la pornographie et la prostitution infantile et la vente de drogue et le trafic d’armes leur enlèverait une grosse partie de leurs profits. Peut-être qu’ils ralentiraient. Mais honnêtement, stopper tout ça serait aussi difficile que de stopper le groupe. »
Mécanisme de Négation du Public
Svali: « L’évidence est là, mais d’après moi, la personne moyenne ne veux PAS savoir, et même si elle y est confrontée, regardera de l’autre coté.
Le cas Franklin (« Franklin case ») en est un exemple. Combien de preuves sont maintenant connues ? Ou les documents sur le MK-Ultra qui ont étés « déclassifiés », démontrés vrais, et les gens l’ignorent.
Ok, Je vais m’arrêter ici. Mais je crois que les médias qui taisent les abus rituels se nourrissent du profond désir de la personne moyenne de NE PAS connaître la réalité. En fait, comment une personne peut-elle faire face à la grande méchanceté de l’humanité, à moins d’avoir soit une grande foi en Dieu, ou de faire face à une insurmontable évidence? En tant qu’êtres humains, nous voulons croire le mieux de notre race, pas le pire, à mon humble avis.
Je ne crois vraiment pas que les gens feraient quoi que ce soit à propos des Illuminati, même s’ils connaissaient la vérité. Désolée pour le cynisme, mais je me base sur l’expérience de ma vie.
Les Illuministes ne sont pas dérangés par ceux qui écrivent ces choses, ou par le fait d’être « exposé », parce qu’ils comptent sur la majorité qui ne le croit pas, ayant effectué du bon travail avec la campagne médiatique (avez-vous vu un article dans Newsweek ou le Times récemment qui traitent de tout cela autrement que comme une ridicule théorie conspiratrice? Devinez qui est propriétaire de Time-Warner? ).
Je les ai entendu rire de tout cela dans une rencontre exécutive il y a cinq ans, et je doute que leur attitude ai changée depuis. Si les gens CROYAIENT cela, une action pourrait être envisageable, et j’en serais surprise et plutôt heureuse. »
Illuminati Defector Details Pervasive Conspiracy
Henry Makow Ph.D., Save The Males, Canada, Octobre 2002
« Svali » est une infirmière enregistrée et une écrivaine indépendante résidant au Texas.
Henry Makow est l’inventeur du jeu de société Scrupules et l’auteur de « A Long Way to go for a Date ». Ses articles précédents sur le féminisme et le Nouvel Ordre Mondial peuvent être trouvés auwww.savethemales.ca. Il apprécie vos commentaires à firstname.lastname@example.org.
Traduction : Évolution Québec