» Occupy Wall Street is COINTELPRO » CIA & OTPOR INFILTRATION

Occupy Wall Street

is COINTELPRO

October 10, 2011

Otpor3.jpgIMPORTANT:   Controlled opposition scam alert….The « OCCUPY AMERICA MOVEMENT ».

It’s everywhere!  Just like Arab Spring for North America!  and it’s sooooooo grass roots and spontaneous!

[Editor’s Note: The « tell » is the  publicity this is getting from the TV Networks who spin it as the Democratic Party equivalent of the Tea Party.]

by Richard Evans
(henrymakow.com) 

COINTELPRO was the FBI acronym for ‘Counter Intelligence Program’. COINTELPRO not only infiltrated domestic antiwar and civil rights protest groups, it also created them.  By 1968, the largest leading ‘counterculture’ groups were entirely FBI/CIA controlled.

In fact the leading ‘Anti-Establishment’ figures of the late 60’s early 70’s were outed years later as having been double agents for the CIA.

SDS-1969.jpgLSD promoter Harvard Dr. Timothy Leary;  feminist icon and co-founder editor of MS Magazine, Gloria Steinem — who persists today as an icon of feminism.

COINTELPRO SDS LOGO c.1969

COINTELPRO never went away, it got privatized.

ORGANIZED BY A SERBIAN OUTFIT

OCCUPY WALL STREET and the OCCUPY TOGETHER MOVEMENT is the work of SERBIAN contract revolution organizers the CENTER FOR APPLIED NONVIOLENT ACTION AND STRATEGIES [C.A.N.V.A.S]  in Belgrade and it’s field operative organizer company, « OPTOR! »

So don’t you believe it when ABC says « Everybody and nobody are in charge…. »  or the Guardian hints, « rumors persist the group « Anonymous » is behind the Occupy Together Movement ».

OTPOR.pngThe cover story is that back in 1998 some college students at the University of Belgrade that were unhappy with totalitarian regime of Slobodan Milošević decided it would be fun to topple the Serbian government.  The smartest guy in the room, Ivan Marovic, allegedly dreamed up a grass roots strategy and they went to work organizing protests as OTPOR! which means RESISTANCE! in English.

<The group was helped by the fact that the US and NATO started bombing the heck out of Serbia in 1999 accelerated the fall of Slobodan Milošević (below left) by 2000.  Western media hailed Marovic and OTPOR! as new age geniuses, but it came out later that Ivan Marovic’s stragegy and program came from a Boston think tank’s subversion manual, ‘From Dictatorship to Democracy’ by a Harvard Professor named Gene Sharp.

Hundreds of copies of the Boston manual were provided in the Serbian language by the Albert Einstein Institution – « a non-profit organization that specializes in the study of the methods of non-violent resistance in conflicts ».

slob.jpgA documentary on Professor Sharp’s global influence on the revolutions export, « How to Start a Revolution » was released in September 2011. It won awards at the Boston Film Festival and London’s Raindance Film Festival on October 2nd 2011.

Basking in media hype that OTPOR! had toppled the big bad Serbian regime, Ivan Marovic and his band of merry pranksters founded the CENTER FOR APPLIED NONVIOLENT ACTION AND STRATEGIES [C.A.N.V.A.S] .  It occupies an office building in downtown Belgrade, which plans revolutions and trains organizers in subversive strategy and tactics for money.  . The Belgrade office is nicknamed ‘Revolution University’.  http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/02/16/revolution_u?page=full

fistcommunism.jpgPEELING THE ONION

Well, hold the bus. That’s the story currently on the Internet, but it omits the same operation in the color and flower revolutions dating back to Czechoslovakia 1989. The VELVET Revolution.
Radio Prague history online:http://archiv.radio.cz/history/history15.html

Word on the street in Prague was that there was KGB involvement getting it started, and we know there was CIA support and Western funding as well.  That may be a meaningful case in itself, and the history of these ‘people’s revolutions’ mustn’t be allowed to fall through the cracks of mainstream media.  OTPOR’s being portrayed as the genesis of ‘people power’ but it was the baby on the block in 1998.    The news today is scripted for an audience born after 1987, evidently.

C.A.N.V.A.S.  even markets a computer game that teaches all ages how to start your own revolution called  « People Power ».  Marovic said candidly in a documentary interview that the game was funded by one of the original backers of Otpor!  A previous version of the game was called ‘A Force More Powerful’.

Marovic said he can personally train only 150 subversives a year, the game reaches tens of thousand at a price of ten dollars a download.   I’ve reviewed the game and attest it’s a highly detailed simulation of how these export revolutions are organized, complete with ‘establishment’ reactions.

The so-called ‘spontaneous’  ‘Twitter’ Revolutions in the Middle East in February.  Who do you think is organizing the unemployed, uneducated, angry Middle East youth who are the brown shirts of these revolutions?  The Carnegie Foundation says the most wonderful things about them.

OTPOR-LOGOS.jpgThey all have the same fist logo. —

http://www.carnegiecouncil.org/resources/articles_papers_reports/0087.html/:pf_printable

Let’s be honest. C.A.N.V.A.S. is a for-profit business, not a non-profit NGO. « Ivan Marovic » is a CIA contractor: a front man like ‘Wikileaks’ Julian Assange.

OCCUPY WALL STREET

fistoffem.jpg(left, the phoney feminist fist)

What’s all this got to do with OCCUPY WALL STREET and the the OCCUPY TOGETHER ‘grass roots’ movement in America?
Take a minute to watch this.  You’ll figure out.

Ivan Marovic of ‘Otpor!’ addresses Occupy Wall Street     NYC Sept. 22, 2011
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LkM3BBtc7N0

Need more?
The Revolution Business –
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpXbA6yZY-8


NOT ALL PROTESTS ARE FAKE

COINTELPRO fake protests partner with MEDIA to distract from real protests.  I believe the Greek protest is genuine.  OCCUPY WALL STREET was timed to drown out the Greeks.

I think this because the Greeks had a specific demand  last month in direct response to their government’s sellout to the IMF.    The Greek protest was saying ‘Don’t vote to accept this debt, traitors!’The « Occupy Wall Street » type protest is  NON SPECIFIC.

CONINTELPRO handled  protests don’t make demands – they make ‘statements’.  Like, « STOP WAR! LEGALIZE POT! « Give us back our future! »   and « Stop pollution! »

OCCUPY TOGETHER in the US and Canada are directed by C.A.N.V.AS., the same directors behind the Tunisian and Egyptian and ‘Arab Spring’ revolutions.  They may look the same but the objectives are quite different.  The objective in America and Canada is NOT to topple ‘regimes’.  C.A.N.V.AS. is backed by Council on Foreign Relations foundations like Carnegie Group and the Albert Einstein Institute and myriad other funnels of Illuminati funding.

– this is yet another orchestrated international  ‘controlled opposition’ mouse trap.  the ‘Tea Party’ is the controlled opposition trap for the convervative, this is the controlled opposition trap for the naive lefties.

Remember the Venus Project?  http://www.henrymakow.com/global_tyranny_moving_forward.html

————-

Occupy Backed by Lefty Millionaires (aka Communists)

99% Wrong

Serbia: The Legacy of Otpor
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UpGWkPBpMaY

COINTELPRO: THE FBI’S COVERT ACTION PROGRAMS AGAINST AMERICAN CITIZENS
http://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/cointelpro/churchfinalreportIIIa.htm

Gloria Steinem – How The CIA Used Feminism To Destabilize Society
http://www.rense.com/general21/hw.htm

What Gloria Steinem, Henry Kissinger Have in Common: CIA Pay
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=a1M9EAly2hog&refer=home

C.A.N.V.A.S.  Website
http://www.canvasopedia.org/legacy/content/serbian_case/otpor_campaign.htm

If its on Huffington Post, It is Soros-Obama

°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°

How COINTELPRO really works and destroys social movements: Open letter from former Tea Partier to Occupy Wall Street protesters

vaslittlecrow
Reddit
Tue, 04 Oct 2011 09:26 CDT
Print

Fawkes in Wall Street

© Robert Johnson

I don’t expect you to believe me. I want you to read this, take it with a grain of salt, and do the research yourself. You may not believe me, but I want your movement to succeed. From a former tea partier to you, young new rebels, there’s some advice to prevent what happened to our now broken movement from happening to you. I don’t agree with everything your movement does, but I sympathize with your cause and agree on our common enemy. You guys are very intelligent and I trust that you will take this in the spirit it is intended.

I wish I could believe this Occupy Wall Street was still about (r)Evolution, but so far, all I am seeing is a painful rehash of how the government turned the pre-Presidential election tea party movement into the joke it is now. We were anarchists and ultra-libertarians, but above all we were peaceful. So, the media tried painting us as racists. But when that didn’t work they tried to goad us into violence. When that failed, they killed our movement with money and false kindness from the theocratic arm of the Republican party. That killed our popular support.

I am sharing these observations, so you guys know what’s going on and can prevent the media from succeeding in painting you as violent slacker hippies rebelling without a cause, or from having the movement be hijacked by a bunch of corporatists seeking to twist the movement’s original intentions. If you think this can’t happen, it happened to the Independence Party and the tea party movement. Don’t let it happen to your movement as well.

Comment: What the author details comes right out of the Ponerization/Cointelpro playbook described in Andrew Lobaczewski’s Political Ponerology.

Here’s how they turned our movement into a bunch of pro-corporate Republican party rebranding astroturf, and this is how I predict they are turning your movement into a bunch of pro-corporate Democratic party rebranding astroturf. I believe many of these things are already happening, so take note.

1- The media will initially and purposely avoid covering your dissenting movement to cause confusion about what your movement is about within mainstream audiences. This is to enrage you and make you appear unreasonable, and perhaps even invisible.

2- While the obfuscation is happening, corporatists/government stooges will infiltrate and give superficial support, focus and financial backing to the targeted movement. In the tea party movement’s case, it was the religious Republicans and Koch Brothers. In this case, it’s the Public Sector Unions (the organizations as quasi-human entities, not the members themselves) and Ultra Rich liberals who pretend to care, but frankly do not serve liberators and freedom seekers but rather the interests of those who run the Public Sector Unions and the Democratic Party. Democrat, Republican, these parties are all part of the same corporate ruling system. Case in point: http://www.debates.org/

3-The media will cover the movement only after this infiltration succeeds. Once the infiltration is completed the MSM will manufacture public media antipathy towards the movement by using selective focus on the movement’s most repulsive elements or infiltrators on the corporate Conservative media side, while the corporate Liberal media will create a more sympathetic tragic hero image — this is the flip side of the tea party, but same media manipulation tactics. I go into greater detail on this tactic here.

4- Someone in the Democratic Party will feign sympathy for the movement and falsely « non-partisan » entities provide tons of funding and unwanted organization, just as was done with the tea party movement by Republicans. Once people assume that the government operatives are their friends, the government will hijack the movement and the threat of your movement will be neutralized.

If this new Occupy Wall Street movement is to survive, here’s what needs to be done.

1- Loudly denounce violence and disavow the violent rabblerousers of the movement. They do not help the cause.

2- Be image conscious. Present your best face and call out those who act like fools within the movement. People are more likely to pay attention to you in your Sunday dress and bringing homemade food, than when you are drinking a bottle of Snapple and chomping on Big Macs while you are looking like a slacker rich hipster/unwashed hippie stereotype.

3- Accept that you’ve already been infiltrated by the government, and work hard to say, and state what your movement is and is not about. « No, this isn’t about unions or Liberals, conservatives or bored spoiled brats. This is about 99% of our population being exploited and manipulated for the sake of profit. » « No we will not resort to violence. » « Yes, all we want is for for the end of government collusion with corporate entities that are illegitimately recognized as people. » And, so forth…

4- Don’t forget who you are as the illusions are thrown at you. Corporatists are masters of illusions. That’s the most powerful weapon they have. That’s how they sell products you don’t need and convince you to justify accepting atrocities for the sake of products Don’t fall for it. Otherwise, your cause will be lost. Be wary of large donations from special interest groups or non-profit corporations that were not involved this movement from the inception. Special interests groups are not your allies. Non-profit corporations are still corporations, and unfortunately, too many of them care more about donations than doing the right thing. Killing a movement with kindness is easy.

5- Remain independent and focused. If you can, pick a face to represent your movement. Rosa Parks wasn’t just a random lady in a bus — She was chosen. You too can use the power of illusion against those who oppose you.

I wish your movement better luck than we had with the tea party movement before it got hijacked by the theocrats and corporatists. We used to be non-partisan too. We were the older version of you. But, I believe that as the media apparatchik and infiltrators start to twist your cause, you will understand the frustration us early adopter tea partiers felt and that we were not your enemy after all. A fascist oligarchy on the verge of winning is our common enemy. This should be your focus. Don’t be dazzled by the illusion as we were. For the sake of our future, know who you are.

Thank you for reading. I would love to read your ideas on the subject. Correct me where I am wrong. Explain what is going right. This is ultimately your fight.

EDITS: To understand how movements get hijacked, fantastic video that JamesCarlin shared.

If my essay seems too conspiratorial for your tastes, try Hibernator’s excellent and much less paranoid sounding summary below:

« Someone starts a movement. It starts small, and there’s a lot going on in the world, so the mainstream media gives it minimal coverage. Today’s mainstream media is also understaffed, so they don’t investigate and they wait for someone else to slap a label on it.

Eventually a sound byte X pops up above the noise and the mainstream media uses this to engage viewers and define the movement. This defining characteristic X spreads like a meme.

People in power now notice what’s going on, and think to themselves « Hmm, this new movement is defined by X, and that’s almost in line with my goals, so maybe I can use them to further my ends. »

But people in power are all labelled as Democrats or Republicans, so now the media applies the polarizing filter of American politics to associate movement X with one of the parties.

The original movement has now been labelled X, and associated with a political party, and none of this happened because of any ‘government conspiracy.’ It just happened because that’s what you get as output when you plug something new into the American political system. »

°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°

Occupy Wall Street Affiliated With Professional Revolutionary Organization OTPOR (CIA)

The guy in the above video is Ivan Marovic. That name probably doesn’t mean much to you, because I know it didn’t mean much to me until I did some further digging. It turns out that Mr. Marovic is the co-founder of Otpor!. Otpor! was a key organization in the Serbian Wars in the 1990s and was also an influence in the Egypt uprisings. If you believe the below documentary then Otpor! is a group of professional revolutionaries.

This is information about Ivan Marovic from Source Watch.org
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Ivan_Marovic
Ivan Marovic, Serbia and Montenegro

“Along with a group of other Serbian student leaders, Marovic formed the OTPOR (“Resistance”) movement in 1998. OTPOR used popular protest and peaceful provocation to build anti-Milosevic support in the 1999-2000 period. Although OTPOR started by mobilizing young people, it quickly expanded into a mass movement with members from all sectors of society. As one of the most visible leaders of OTPOR, Marovic best represented the common youth of Serbia and organized rallies and marches in the lead-up to the September 2000 election that ousted the Milosevic regime. After 2000, OTPOR focused on building democratic society in Serbia and opposing corruption. OTPOR has become a model for resistance movements in other countries, including Georgia, Ukraine, Belarus and Albania.”

The thing they will not tell you about Mr. Marovic and his good friend Srdja Popovic, who were the leaders of OTPOR, is that that organization and they were all sponsored by the CIA.  Their handler was William Montgomery, who was coordinating their actions from the CIA Headquarters for Southern Europe in Budapest, Hungary.  Wm. Montgomery later became U. S. Ambassador in Post Milosevic Serbia.

I have been quite skeptical of the Occupy movement since it suddenly sprang up out of nowhere in the last couple of weeks. While I have been in full support of the « End the Fed » movement, I am suspicious of any « grassroots » movement that immediately gets corporate media support. I recall there being nationwide « End the Fed » rallies in 2009 that received little to no mainstream media coverage.

When I heard Van Jones along with various union bosses claim their support for the Occupy movement in recent weeks, it confirmed for me that this Occupy is essentially the Tea-Party version of the extreme progressive political agenda. Van Jones even recently discussed an « October Offensive » that would be used to counter the Tea Party.

However, the list of demands from Occupy Wall Street website sounds like a wet dream of someone with a very strong socialist and communist agenda. In fact, these demands read like a new-age version of some bootleg Karl Marx list.

I was willing to jump on board with this Occupy group until I read this list, but after reading this list, I see that it is just another group with an agenda and I have no desire whatsoever to be affiliated with an organization that is promoting that agenda. If this group truly wants to get me involved with them, then:

Where is the demand for the repeal of the PATRIOT Act?
What about ending the international wars of aggression?
What about ending the opium trade in Afghanistan?
What about ending the Presidential-ordered killings of US citizens without a court hearing and due process?
What about actually demanding criminal accountability on Wall Street (as the name of the group might imply) and in other financial arenas?
Where is the demand for the disposition of the bankers’ stolen loot and gains over the years?
What about the end of warrantless wiretapping and spying by the government and telecoms?
What about an end to the Federal Reserve?
What about the nexus and conflict between former government regulators receiving lucrative private sector jobsfrom the very companies/industries they were regulating?
What about the end of torture?

I came up with those demands without even picking up a book or doing a real thorough analysis that I would have done if I was organizing a movement. Please note that I didn’t include any of the numerous conspiracy theories previously discussed on this blog. However, instead of any of the above, the Occupy movement focuses on things that will never happen or will lead to outright Civil War. Namely, it focuses on the same issues that I have seen in numerous progressive/union/left-leaning/communist literature. In fact, when I was way more naive back in 2006, I ran a political campaign with a platform that was somewhat similar in certain areas. Fortunately, my ideology has evolved.

###

Here are the Occupy Wall Street demands (along with my annotations):

Demand one: Restoration of the living wage. This demand can only be met by ending « Freetrade » by re-imposing trade tariffs on all imported goods entering the American market to level the playing field for domestic family farming and domestic manufacturing as most nations that are dumping cheap products onto the American market have radical wage and environmental regulation advantages. Another policy that must be instituted is raise the minimum wage to twenty dollars an hr.

Why not tax the profits of American corporations who incorporate and operate in other nations simply for the avoidance and payment of taxes? The only problem is that most major corporations are multinational. If US imposes strict regulations or taxes, the corporations will simply remove all (or curtail a material portion) of its operations from the United States market to a more favorable market.

If the tariffs are too costly, then the corporations will pass those costs along to the American consumers who will no longer be able to afford the foreign goods. A void would potentially exist for American companies to produce these goods, but the current government regulations are barriers to entry for anyone aside from international investors. $20 an hour minimum wage would never work. It would kill more jobs than it would save. Many businesses do not make enough money to pay its employees $20/hour, so it would have to terminate staff. A rise in minimum wage for everyone would also cause inflation, because everyone would be making more money.

Demand two: Institute a universal single payer healthcare system. To do this all private insurers must be banned from the healthcare market as their only effect on the health of patients is to take money away from doctors, nurses and hospitals preventing them from doing their jobs and hand that money to wall st. investors.

I agree that the insurance industry is a huge issue, but allowing the federal government to run all of health care would be even worse. I wouldn’t necessarily be against some type of federally subsidized program for basic health needs, but I am against any federal mandate that everyone has to buy insurance.Demand three: Guaranteed living wage income regardless of employment.
That would never work. Why would someone ever work a difficult or dangerous job?
Demand four: Free college education.
I agree that education should be available to anyone who wants to pursue it, but how does one pay for free college education for everyone? Who will pay the teachers? Buy the library books? Build the dormitories? If every college will be 100% federal government-funded, then the federal government will controlling all of the colleges/universities in the country. I certainly would never agree to that scenario. If they want to help college students, remove the ridiculous profits in the private student loan industry.Demand five: Begin a fast track process to bring the fossil fuel economy to an end while at the same bringing the alternative energy economy up to energy demand.
This is pie-in-the-sky stuff unless the government is willing to release all of its black-ops technology where it is alleged that free energy like Mr. Fusion does exist. Assuming that free energy does not exist yet, then there is no way to transition out of fossil fuels without decimating the economy. Further, the so-called « green energy » push by the government is a scam as evidenced by the recent political scandal in the solar energy industry. Our current state of technology is not a viable substitute for fossil fuel energy. It may make someone feel good to drive a Prius, but what happens when the world runs out of the rare earth metals needed to construct the battery technology?Demand six: One trillion dollars in infrastructure (Water, Sewer, Rail, Roads and Bridges and Electrical Grid) spending now.
Where do we get $1,000,000,000,000 from when the country is broke? Should we just print it up on the Federal Reserve printers? Borrow it from China?Demand seven: One trillion dollars in ecological restoration planting forests, reestablishing wetlands and the natural flow of river systems and decommissioning of all of America’s nuclear power plants.
As in the previous Demand, where do we get $1,000,000,000,000? I agree on the decommissioning of the nuclear plants, because radiation is a curse on this planet. However, this Demand conflicts with Demand Five, because nuclear is considered alternative energy. Nuclear accounts for 20% of the power in the country. What will be the substitute for nuclear while these power plants are being decommissioned? Further, if you reestablish all wetlands, that means destroying all dams and canals. 6% of US power comes from hydroelectric, so that along with nuclear would wipe 26% of the US electrical power capacity. If you take this Demand into account with Demand Five, we would essentially have to live in the Dark Ages with no fossil fuels, nuclear power, hydroelectric or coal.Demand eight: Racial and gender equal rights amendment.
More pie-in-the-sky stuff. There is already an Equal Protection Clause in the Constitution that supposedly grants equal protections in connection with government and State action, but it has been abused by Courts since the late 1800s. A proposed Equal Rights Amendment failed in the 1980s. Additional Amendments addressing these social issues would only cause more court cases and more confusing, judicial rulings that would still favor those people with the economic resources to game the legal system. The country simply needs to enforce the laws and regulations that are currently on the books.Demand nine: Open borders migration. anyone can travel anywhere to work and live.
If you are pro-illegal immigration, then you will love this one. I am anti-illegal immigration and I believe in national sovereignty, so I do not agree with this Demand either. I do agree that people should be able to travel, work and live wherever they want, but it shouldn’t be an unfettered right to do anything one wants to do. I can’t move to another country and expect to do whatever I want to do.Demand ten: Bring American elections up to international standards of a paper ballot precinct counted and recounted in front of an independent and party observers system.
I agree that our election system is corrupt, but international elections are no better and in many cases, worse. I do believe that there should be a paper receipt for all votes that can be manually reviewed in case of any issues.Demand eleven: Immediate across the board debt forgiveness for all. Debt forgiveness of sovereign debt, commercial loans, home mortgages, home equity loans, credit card debt, student loans and personal loans now! All debt must be stricken from the « Books. » World Bank Loans to all Nations, Bank to Bank Debt and all Bonds and Margin Call Debt in the stock market including all Derivatives or Credit Default Swaps, all 65 trillion dollars of them must also be stricken from the « Books. » And I don’t mean debt that is in default, I mean all debt on the entire planet period.
I would love for all my student loans to be wiped off of the books, but wiping this debt out would not solve the problem. Legit debts need to be paid. Otherwise, wiping these debts out would simply create hyperinflation. Food isn’t going to magically appear on your table. Your kids’ clothes aren’t going to magically sprout from a cottonseed. Gas isn’t going to magically appear in your tank. Your cell phone and Internet bills will not pay themselves. If the economy goes into hyperinflation, most of these things will either disappear or become in very short supply very quickly. However, I do AGREE that all fraudulent debts and instruments need to be canceled and the originators of these instruments need to be criminally and civilly tried in Court.Demand twelve: Outlaw all credit reporting agencies.
I don’t really use credit anymore, but I do understand that some people need it to build businesses. I wouldn’t outlaw credit reporting agencies, but I would curtail some of these agencies’ powers.

Demand thirteen: Allow all workers to sign a ballot at any time during a union organizing campaign or at any time that represents their yeah or nay to having a union represent them in collective bargaining or to form a union.

What does this have to do with 99%? I’m not in a union and have never really wanted to be in a union. I don’t have a desire to pay someone money for the « right » to negotiate on my behalf. It sounds like the mob to me. Union membership may be important to some, but it is an irrelevant issue to me and when I hear people pushing it as a major issue, then I know it’s really a political issue!There are a couple of decent points in those demands, but a majority of them are as unrealistic as me swimming to the Moon.
I bet most of these folks protesting and occupying these locations are great people who have the best intentions. However, I am reminded of that old statement about the pavement on the road to Hell. Sometimes when I write these blog articles, I hope I am wrong about my statements and this is one of those times! But….At the end of the day, it seems like the anger in the streets has been (or will be) co-opted by the professional revolutionaries and all of their affiliates of the extreme progressive agenda.Updates:Obama’s CIA Director Leon Panetta’s Communist Ties

Barack Hussein Obama, protégé of Frank Marshall Davis and Bill Ayers, isn’t the only member of the current misadministration with communist ties. Look what Accuracy in Media has learned about current CIA director and Secretary of Defense nominee Leon Panetta:
The evidence shows that Panetta had a close and personal relationship with a member of the Communist Party by the name of Hugh DeLacy, whose record included meeting with communist espionage agents.
Still more disturbing is the evidence they did not find:

http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/leon-panettas-communist-ties/

See, the White house even admits to supporting them..

http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2005/02/20050224-3.html

Background on Participants « champions of Freedom »
February 24, 2005

BACKGROUND ON PARTICIPANTS

« CHAMPIONS OF FREEDOM »

Ivan Marovic, Serbia and Montenegro

Along with a group of other Serbian student leaders, Marovic formed the OTPOR (« Resistance ») movement in 1998. OTPOR used popular protest and peaceful provocation to build anti-Milosevic support in the 1999-2000 period. Although OTPOR started by mobilizing young people, it quickly expanded into a mass movement with members from all sectors of society. As one of the most visible leaders of OTPOR, Marovic best represented the common youth of Serbia and organized rallies and marches in the lead-up to the September 2000 election that ousted the Milosevic regime. After 2000, OTPOR focused on building democratic society in Serbia and opposing corruption. OTPOR has become a model for resistance movements in other countries, including Georgia, Ukraine, Belarus and Albania.

Posted by Dj Osiris

°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°

°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°

Occupy Wall Street is COINTELPRO (Phony Opposition)

October 10, 2011

Otpor3.jpgIMPORTANT:   Controlled opposition scam alert….The « OCCUPY AMERICA MOVEMENT ».

It’s everywhere!  Just like Arab Spring for North America!  and it’s sooooooo grass roots and spontaneous!

[Editor’s Note: The « tell » is the  publicity this is getting from the TV Networks who spin it as the Democratic Party equivalent of the Tea Party.]

by Richard Evans
(henrymakow.com) 

COINTELPRO was the FBI acronym for ‘Counter Intelligence Program’. COINTELPRO not only infiltrated domestic antiwar and civil rights protest groups, it also created them.  By 1968, the largest leading ‘counterculture’ groups were entirely FBI/CIA controlled.

In fact the leading ‘Anti-Establishment’ figures of the late 60’s early 70’s were outed years later as having been double agents for the CIA.

SDS-1969.jpgLSD promoter Harvard Dr. Timothy Leary;  feminist icon and co-founder editor of MS Magazine, Gloria Steinem — who persists today as an icon of feminism.

COINTELPRO SDS LOGO c.1969

COINTELPRO never went away, it got privatized.

ORGANIZED BY A SERBIAN OUTFIT

OCCUPY WALL STREET and the OCCUPY TOGETHER MOVEMENT is the work of SERBIAN contract revolution organizers the CENTER FOR APPLIED NONVIOLENT ACTION AND STRATEGIES [C.A.N.V.A.S]  in Belgrade and it’s field operative organizer company, « OPTOR! »

So don’t you believe it when ABC says « Everybody and nobody are in charge…. »  or the Guardian hints, « rumors persist the group « Anonymous » is behind the Occupy Together Movement ».

OTPOR.pngThe cover story is that back in 1998 some college students at the University of Belgrade that were unhappy with totalitarian regime of Slobodan Milošević decided it would be fun to topple the Serbian government.  The smartest guy in the room, Ivan Marovic, allegedly dreamed up a grass roots strategy and they went to work organizing protests as OTPOR! which means RESISTANCE! in English.

<The group was helped by the fact that the US and NATO started bombing the heck out of Serbia in 1999 accelerated the fall of Slobodan Milošević (below left) by 2000.  Western media hailed Marovic and OTPOR! as new age geniuses, but it came out later that Ivan Marovic’s stragegy and program came from a Boston think tank’s subversion manual, ‘From Dictatorship to Democracy’ by a Harvard Professor named Gene Sharp.

Hundreds of copies of the Boston manual were provided in the Serbian language by the Albert Einstein Institution – « a non-profit organization that specializes in the study of the methods of non-violent resistance in conflicts ».

slob.jpgA documentary on Professor Sharp’s global influence on the revolutions export, « How to Start a Revolution » was released in September 2011. It won awards at the Boston Film Festival and London’s Raindance Film Festival on October 2nd 2011.

Basking in media hype that OTPOR! had toppled the big bad Serbian regime, Ivan Marovic and his band of merry pranksters founded the CENTER FOR APPLIED NONVIOLENT ACTION AND STRATEGIES [C.A.N.V.A.S] .  It occupies an office building in downtown Belgrade, which plans revolutions and trains organizers in subversive strategy and tactics for money.  . The Belgrade office is nicknamed ‘Revolution University’.  http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/02/16/revolution_u?page=full

fistcommunism.jpgPEELING THE ONION

Well, hold the bus. That’s the story currently on the Internet, but it omits the same operation in the color and flower revolutions dating back to Czechoslovakia 1989. The VELVET Revolution.
Radio Prague history online:http://archiv.radio.cz/history/history15.html

Word on the street in Prague was that there was KGB involvement getting it started, and we know there was CIA support and Western funding as well.  That may be a meaningful case in itself, and the history of these ‘people’s revolutions’ mustn’t be allowed to fall through the cracks of mainstream media.  OTPOR’s being portrayed as the genesis of ‘people power’ but it was the baby on the block in 1998.    The news today is scripted for an audience born after 1987, evidently.

C.A.N.V.A.S.  even markets a computer game that teaches all ages how to start your own revolution called  « People Power ».  Marovic said candidly in a documentary interview that the game was funded by one of the original backers of Otpor!  A previous version of the game was called ‘A Force More Powerful’.

Marovic said he can personally train only 150 subversives a year, the game reaches tens of thousand at a price of ten dollars a download.   I’ve reviewed the game and attest it’s a highly detailed simulation of how these export revolutions are organized, complete with ‘establishment’ reactions.

The so-called ‘spontaneous’  ‘Twitter’ Revolutions in the Middle East in February.  Who do you think is organizing the unemployed, uneducated, angry Middle East youth who are the brown shirts of these revolutions?  The Carnegie Foundation says the most wonderful things about them.

OTPOR-LOGOS.jpgThey all have the same fist logo. —

http://www.carnegiecouncil.org/resources/articles_papers_reports/0087.html/:pf_printable

Let’s be honest. C.A.N.V.A.S. is a for-profit business, not a non-profit NGO. « Ivan Marovic » is a CIA contractor: a front man like ‘Wikileaks’ Julian Assange.

OCCUPY WALL STREET

fistoffem.jpg(left, the phoney feminist fist)

What’s all this got to do with OCCUPY WALL STREET and the the OCCUPY TOGETHER ‘grass roots’ movement in America?
Take a minute to watch this.  You’ll figure out.

Ivan Marovic of ‘Otpor!’ addresses Occupy Wall Street     NYC Sept. 22, 2011
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LkM3BBtc7N0

Need more?
The Revolution Business –
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpXbA6yZY-8


NOT ALL PROTESTS ARE FAKE

COINTELPRO fake protests partner with MEDIA to distract from real protests.  I believe the Greek protest is genuine.  OCCUPY WALL STREET was timed to drown out the Greeks.

I think this because the Greeks had a specific demand  last month in direct response to their government’s sellout to the IMF.    The Greek protest was saying ‘Don’t vote to accept this debt, traitors!’The « Occupy Wall Street » type protest is  NON SPECIFIC.

CONINTELPRO handled  protests don’t make demands – they make ‘statements’.  Like, « STOP WAR! LEGALIZE POT! « Give us back our future! »   and « Stop pollution! »

OCCUPY TOGETHER in the US and Canada are directed by C.A.N.V.AS., the same directors behind the Tunisian and Egyptian and ‘Arab Spring’ revolutions.  They may look the same but the objectives are quite different.  The objective in America and Canada is NOT to topple ‘regimes’.  C.A.N.V.AS. is backed by Council on Foreign Relations foundations like Carnegie Group and the Albert Einstein Institute and myriad other funnels of Illuminati funding.

– this is yet another orchestrated international  ‘controlled opposition’ mouse trap.  the ‘Tea Party’ is the controlled opposition trap for the convervative, this is the controlled opposition trap for the naive lefties.

Remember the Venus Project?  http://www.henrymakow.com/global_tyranny_moving_forward.html

————-

Occupy Backed by Lefty Millionaires (aka Communists)

99% Wrong

Serbia: The Legacy of Otpor
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UpGWkPBpMaY

COINTELPRO: THE FBI’S COVERT ACTION PROGRAMS AGAINST AMERICAN CITIZENS
http://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/cointelpro/churchfinalreportIIIa.htm

Gloria Steinem – How The CIA Used Feminism To Destabilize Society
http://www.rense.com/general21/hw.htm

What Gloria Steinem, Henry Kissinger Have in Common: CIA Pay
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=a1M9EAly2hog&refer=home

C.A.N.V.A.S.  Website
http://www.canvasopedia.org/legacy/content/serbian_case/otpor_campaign.htm

If its on Huffington Post, It is Soros-Obama

REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED

Comments for « Occupy Wall Street is COINTELPRO (Phony Opposition) »

MS said (October 12, 2011):

« Occupy Wall Street is COINTELPRO (Phony Opposition) »….

Most impressive, thank you for the consideration and decision to place this on the Internet.

Many of us do not have this kind of history at our immediate disposal, and to relay this level of information is both brave and correctly patriotic for the struggling Republic.


Mohammed in S Africa said (October 11, 2011):
the powers that be know that people are rightly fed up with their antics and have devised this plan to control any opposition.
they have staged these protests to allow people to safely vent their anger & frustration so that nothing really productive is achieved.

like when anyone is speaking to someone who is angry or upset.
you have to allow them to get their complaints/grievances off their chest before you can say anything.

once they have said everything thay want to, its much easier to handle them as most of the anger has been vented.

like a balloon- once the air escapes, there basically nothing left.

once people have ranted & raved-they feel as if they have accomplished something and they powers that be know its safe to carry on with business as usual.
if people kept their anger & frustrations bottled up- that would be a disturbing to the zionist bankers as they dont know when & how it will be vented.


Doug said (October 11, 2011):

I agree that the Occupy demonstrations were either false to begin with or have been subverted. I suspect the former.

The satanists have been siphoning off money from the banking system with increased intensity from the mid-nineties. They knew that sooner or later their chickens would come home to roost and have long prepared for this type of blow back; their intention was and is to control such blow back. i.e. no real solutions offered just headless chaos that vaguely affixes blame to the very top of the banking elite (1 %) and not their extended Luciferian membership (more like 5%) many of whom have been enriched over the years.

The reality is that many of their Luciferian membership have benefited from easy credit for many years; they infiltrated all levels of finance and their bank managers were told to give loans to their members regardless of sound banking practices or eligibility. Many loans made good and no problem resulted; in this way many Luciferians got their helping hand up the ladder of life while sheeple with impeccable references were simply unable to obtain finance.

Those Luciferians that failed to repay or make good on such easy loans were also no problem for the banks concerned; these bad debts were « underwritten » by big brother who has eventually coalesced them all under the aegis of the world’s biggest merchant banks… and dumped them back at the feet of the sheeple tax payers.

A classic win-win for the Luciferians; many of the Luciferian membership bought properties, businesses, shares etc etc and thus created a new Luciferian affluent « upper-middle class » while the old sheeple middle class was squeezed to death. Credit crunches / increased taxes / inflation …all helped do it. It has been the greatest transfer of wealth in history and has been intensified on a world wide basis for roughly two decades. It has been happening in SA just as everywhere else. That is where the « Occupy » demos come in; it is their end game, their clean up operation to hide the evidence. The heads of banking institutions and some politicians will be vilified but the real elephant in the room….the massive army of newly affluent Luciferian elite…will remain hidden.

The banksters at the top obviously got a lot more than their rank and file and are the guilty head honchos… but they did not keep all those trillions for their personal use. They were the paymasters for a new affluent army that is significantly more than the 1% the demos would have us believe.

The Luciferians laughingly give their plot away in the new animated movie RANGO. That is how they re-assure their world wide rank and file membership that these demonstrations were anticipated and are safely under their control.

Look in the movie at the appearance and dominance of the massive « eye » when the « people posse » go looking for their money. Note how the snake tells the bankers/politicians that it is he, the snake, who is really in control when it begins to squeeze the life from the sheeple. Note also how the single banker/mayor dies while the snake not only survives but establishes a rapport with the « people posse » at the end of the movie.

This is their end game after years of theft…and they have a few loose ends to tie up.


Ty said (October 11, 2011):

Just wanted to congratulate you on a fine article « Christ, Reason (Logos) and Greek Philosophy ». Many people like myself understand that the Greeks were of the Northern Tribes of Israel after they were carried away by the Assyrians between 745 and 721 BC. We also find it no coincidence why Judah (the Southern Tribes) desired to have the Torah (OT) translated into Greek (Septuigent) while they were banished to Babylon for a time. Hence, to us, it is not much of a mystery why the ancient Greeks understood the things they did. Good article and insight!


Edin (Netherlands) said (October 11, 2011):

About the OWS: the movement itself could’ve been hijacked or perhaps even started by cointelpro. But by the looks of it, there is the awareness (time will tell if there’s enough of it) that both the left wing and the right wing of the bird still belong to the very same bird. And if the system is sucking us dry, what does it say about its wings who – with the voter’s approval – try to keep that system crapping on us? ( http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/10/welcome-to-the-ows-99-movement-%e2%80%9cwe-will-not-be-co-opted%e2%80%9d.html http://tarpley.net/2011/10/07/occupy-wall-street-who-wants-to-hijack-the-movement/ )

So there’s genuine unhappiness among the people and it’s only logical that our powerbrokers want to channel that unhappiness somewhere where it can’t hurt them and that’s why they’re trying to present this whole thing as a leftist anti-right movement. Who gets the blame for the mess we’re in: not the vampire system itself, but just ONE of its marketing agencies.

I guess it’ll come down to how aware the average protester is. Will he keep a sharp eye and clear judgment or let himself be talked into easiness, so that others can ‘take care’ of the problem? If OWS is indeed cointelpro, I hope it will be an example that through the hands of the wicked some good will still come.


Richard Evans said (October 10, 2011):

We’re both used to the ‘kill the messenger’ response. It’s a knee-jerk reaction from people who have invested emotional hope in these candy coated traps. That’s okay, it may take days or weeks or months for them to assimilate what we’re trying to inform them. An initial response of denial is expected.

Your advice to them about what a real pubic movement would look like is right. Real movements know what they want and make clear demands.

This ‘Occupy Little Rock planning meeting’ shows how vague this ‘movement’ is. These people are parroting platitudes. They can’t even tell you ‘who’ they are addressing. I can’t find « Capitalism » listed in the phone book.
http://www.arktimes.com/ArkansasBlog/archives/2011/10/07/video-occupy-little-rock-planning-meeting

I’ve been reading the comments. The most common error I see is people are looking at the people who show up instead of asking who the organizers are, and the funding.
Anybody whose been to pop music concerts and festivals, amusement parks, airports, knows managing crowds of people is a highly organized business. Those Lady Gaga concerts don’t just happen. Neither do protests.


Carl said (October 10, 2011):

Here is a question we have to ask ourselves.
Perhaps Occupy Wall street has been or is in the process of being infiltrated? What should people be doing if they don’t focus on banking reform (fractional reserve lending and debt currency)?

Isn’t this the golden goose that these Jesuit/Illuminati want to protect? Should we be blogging about this and having 1 out of every million read it and go back to their routine? Should be be chastising people for being stupid and not doing anything like Jeff Rense does? He doesn’t even take calls like Drockton.

At least fiat banking is a target. lets hope they don’t make gold backed currency Pharaohs out of Rothschild because we already had that problem before. We need to end Fractional reserve lending and privately owned debt fiat.

Now lets turn off our computer and get out there. Its that simple, almost all of the human conflicts of the last 200 years have revolved around this topic.


Chris said (October 10, 2011):

What I noticed was that there wasn’t any coverage of the protest until known groups became a part of it. At the start, the media didn’t know what to report, because they couldn’t figure out what was going on. Media has one aim now a days, and that is to construct peoples perceptions about events so that it fits their operation. Their greatest fear is not knowing what to do because the people are acting in a way that is outside their box. So they simply ignored the protests.

Once « known » groups became a part of the protest, such as Ivan Marovic, the media could begin to form their viewers opinions because they could now defined who was their hero and villain. Of course, those characters are different depending on which media outlet you view. Lefts claim to support the protests and the right calls them communists, just as expected. But at the start, the right couldn’t call the average American protester a communist, and the left couldn’t claim them to be part of the new democrats. And now we have the complete media coverage, which is as stupid and biased as we should have expected.

There are many genuine people that feel the way the original protesters feel, but that voice has now been drowned out, and the average American will have to continue to suffer under the invisible hand that has taken their right to freedom of speech and assembly away by use of radicalized politics and mass media brainwashing. But that’s what happens when power is placed in monopolies and oligopolies. Thanks deregulation for completing the corruption of our government. Both parties are laughing at all of us.


Sam said (October 10, 2011):

totally agree with your comments — that we will recognize real protest because: « It will avoid the Communist symbolism and focus on the Fed and not capitalism » — and later where you said: « There is just one Gordian knot: we need to nationalize all central banks and denounce debt created by book entry. » That is very nicely put.

In line with that, I believe that REAL protesters are going to be pointing out that 9/11 was (and still is) a zionist Israeli project.

Very best wishes,

Sam

Thanks for this reminder Sam,

You’re right. We’ll recognize the real movement when it demands the real perpetrators of 9-11 be exposed and punished.

Henry


E.J. said (October 10, 2011):

The VERY, VERY, VERY best thing about all this, IS all this. Millions of people are receiving information they never knew about and it has to start turning some rusty wheels in those sleepy heads for sure.

Yeah, some of the people are correct, got to beat the crap out of the bullies to make them give it up but that can also be metaphorical….IE: Don’t give them our money. Nationwide strikes against them…don’t go to work, don’t shop, don’t drive, don’t watch TV, just stay with your neighbors and family and self educate and self learn.

Sure, it will hurt some, but not as much as it’s going to if we let them stay « alive » and taking.


Mary Jane said (October 10, 2011):

i didn’t really read that article, just sort of skipped over it but i think that the way to go for all of us ‘at the bottom’ is to start our own « black » economy. under the table black money and services are the best! no tax, no trail, no hassle from the man.


Duncan said (October 10, 2011):

As one who has been in the Patriot movement since the mid 70s, here are my suggestions as the 4 goals of the grassroots:

1.) End the FEDeral Reserve (this includes its brother the IRS). Bring back Constitutional (non-usury and debt-less JFK, Lincoln, and Andrew Jackson asset-based) dollars, once and for all.

2.) Officially recognize the already present two-tier make-up of people in this nation: the [productive-driven] civilian, and the citizen-slave(who need a big brother).

3.) End the War on Drugs. Set up programs that allow those hooked to register in programs that recognize them as ill of ease and being helped rather than made to join elements as criminals and the jailed. Decriminalize the growing of all varieties of hemp plants. This will be a boom for our agriculture and related products and businesses. (Drugs, illegal and legal, are the last remaining fuel in our PRESENT economy. This is really big. Why not be honest with this and deal with it?)

4.) Make a complete change in our present educational system, which since the early 1970s, has become based on propaganda of a false-pride. A new method would be like our once military training where what is necessary is taught, and on-the-job training is a great part of one’s education. Example would be the rule, not enforcement of what to repeat-after-me. The citizen-group would have programs made available where they could join a demonstration-via-action group, which would allow them to learn to become civilians under their own freedom, [with] responsibility, and care. The War on both Freedom and those seeking self-responsibility would end.

As the US military makes a hasty retreat from its war waging efforts in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya, it can shift its job deployment over to tackle my 4th (changing the direction of the educational system in the USA) of only a 4 step plan of re-starting/revitalizing the usA; and to a lesser degree that of the 2nd step (official recognition and functioning of an already existing but rarely admitted two-tier set-up/classification of Americans: civilian and citizenship. I give a brief rundown of this on my Facebook account and more in my 2nd book, ‘ENSLAVEMENT 2011?’ available as an e-book on http://www.lulu.com (The first few pages can be read free by clicking under the photo-cover of my back-side on that website.)
Duncan Phelps, gov’nor 51st e-state of mind


LP said (October 10, 2011):

#OWS – « Cointelpro? »

Henry,
The editorial raises some interesting points. Not to put a damper on these events, the fact remains that « your » government doesn’t work for you (us). Howard Zinn in his « A People’s History of the United States » summed it up rather nicely. The same philosophy can be extended to all governments. They exist to serve the elite. They make rules to contain and suppress « the masses ». Today I read an excerpt from the mayor of Seattle. He sounded « reasonable » and the protesters responded positively. Basically, he was « giving permission » for some actions and prohibiting others. The fact that the protesters seem content with this further reinforces Mr. Zinn’s point. His point, basically is that governments strive to keep the masses right at the point of rebellion. When they cross the line, they are placated, just to the degree necessary to preserve the system.

These people are fed up. They should be. Petitioning those responsible is ridiculous. The elites never give up power willingly. You can get them to « back down » on certain points, so long as it does not threaten their ability to control. I can’t say with any certainty whether this is a manufactured movement or not. By now it is certainly infiltrated. There is no way to have anything organized without that infiltration. There are legions of experts in psychology and marketing to handle events like this. This will fizzle just like all other attempts at « change ». I am not familiar with any « revolt » that wasn’t manufactured from without. People do not « spontaneously » revolt. People who revolt do not ask permission of those they are revolting against. The only successful revolts are those in which the police and military join the revolt.

While it is good to see any form of resistance, this is already doomed to failure. Probably the only mass form of resistance that actually works is the « general strike ». With those, the police finally give up on beating the populace into submission and they win. Of course, there are always a group of psychopaths in the wings just waiting to jump in and « lead ». I’m afraid that from my perspective, the only hope for people is to resist this individually. Just turn their backs and say « no ». The powerful are only powerful so long as people obey them. When that obedience stops, they crawl back in the slimy pit they came from. Currently the government no longer has even the pretense of ruling with the consent of the governed. They clearly believe that they have it all under control. They have more cops and equipment, not to mention the military, to repress any uprising, all of it paid for by the slaves and their grandchildren.

So, is this controlled? If not originally, by now it certainly is. It would not be on NBCCBSMSNBC…….etc., if it weren’t. NOTHING gets into the MSM without careful vetting. I’ll make a prediction. They will use this to crush hope. They’ll let it go for a while and either it will fizzle in the face of their opposition, or they’ll mercilessly crush it as an example of what happens to those who resist.


RC said (October 10, 2011):

WOW a little short on evidence of your theory that they are COINTELPRO

http://www.henrymakow.com/occupy_wall_street_is_cointelp.html
So people actually try to do something to take back this country and everyone is standing around calling THEM the problem

pretty pathetic

I follow this every day, if you want the real info on OWS go to youtube and get Olbermann reading their statement

If you want REAL footage go to blog.alexanderhiggins.com

These protests were started 3 weeks ago by Adbusters and Anonymous and were ignored right up untilt he timme the police decided to beat innocent protesters.

I’m quite disappointed in both your article and Rense’s other critical articles which dont offer any helpful criticism or solutions

If OWS gets co-opted, it will be because of a lack of support and articles like these

RC

Heaven forbid people are warned so they don’t get deceived and used.

henry


Gregory said (October 10, 2011):

« Enlighten us: What will a « genuine » people’s movement look like, if not just like this? » — Bill

« It will avoid the Communist symbolism and focus on the Fed and not capitalism. » — henry

I agree with Bill about this. I attended the Occupy Portland protest on October 6th, which drew about 5,500 people. What I saw there was a wide variety of people from teens to geriatric, although predominantly young (teens to forties). Most of the people at the rally appeared to be well-informed, self-directed, skeptical about all Parties and movements, and highly motivated. « End the Fed » signs were abundant; I saw only one « Capitalism Doesn’t Work » sign that was carried by two women who
looked to be about twenty years old. Frankly, I agree strongly with those two young women.

The Occupy protesters chanted « We are the 99% » and « The 1% must go! » That is one of the most oft-repeated messages of the Occupy movement and it is fundamentally a Socialist message. The Occupy movement has identified (correctly, in my opinion) the gap between the haves and the have-nots as the root cause of domestic suffering and injustice and also the chief
cause of international conflicts and wars.

The 99% are waking up to the fact that the 1% have been waging Class War against them for centuries. Now the 99% are organizing to fight back against the 1%. Hopefully, the Occupy movement marks the beginning of the end of the rule of the 1%.

The rumors and speculations that thrive on the Internet sometimes fail to describe what is actually happening at a protest. You have to go there and meet the people to see what is actually happening. You may not like the Socialist ideals of the Occupy movement, but I can tell you that their
Socialist idealism appears to be a spontaneous expression of sincere people who have studied history and reached their own conclusions.

Of course the elitist Establishment will try to harness and control the Occupy movement — but they may eventually find that they have backed a horse that will unseat them from power.

Thanks Gregory,

I might add, « it will not get on the network news. »

Look we’re on the same side. But to defeat the enemy we have to understand who he is. He is the families who own the central banks of the world, and through them control everything and everyone else.

The history of Communism is they build coalitions or « popular fronts » with unsuspecting innocents. They support and manipulate all sides to attain their goals. Their goal is this case is to spin discontent in Left wing Democratic Party terms, further dividing and polarizing the people.

We need to unite against the Fed and its octopus-like influence. Free enterprise is something the enemy opposes. They are into big government which they control.

There is just one Gordian knot: we need to nationalize all central banks and denounce debt created by book entry.
Henry


Wayne said (October 10, 2011):

The government strategy is simple. Keep them doing ineffective things until the New York winter hits. There won’t be much fight left in them after a few weeks of real cold, wind, rain, sleet and snow.


Becky said (October 10, 2011):

Henry–I have no doubt that there are agents of the government on the ground there–just as there were at the G20 protests. But I question this writers assertion that none of us are smart enough or caring enough to protest on our own? Why are we supposed to believe that the omnipotent government controls our every thought and action?

We know the ‘revolution’ in Libya were set up by the goon squad of NATO etc. but the real people of Libya are protesting against this. I don’t see anyone in NY or anywhere else fighting against the protesters. From what I have read and heard most people are on the side of the protesters.

This article sounds more like the government’s desperate move to protect their own backsides?


Ron said (October 10, 2011):

News organizations are suddenly embedding reporters downtown in Manhattan; whereas 2 weeks ago they could not care less as there was ‘no harm’ or real action happening. That changed when the pepper spray incident went viral and then the mysterious Brooklyn Bridge event where some have said the police forced some of them to take the roadway and then were arrested for obstructing traffic, etc.

Back in the late 70s and early 80s I became friendly with author Walter Bowart [CIA: Operation Mind Control]. I helped him set up a very revealing slide show in downtown NY at a local Church group…..curiously not far from the site of these protests. It was quite fascinating to notice how ill-informed nearly everyone was [and still is] about how Intel organizations operate. To control all sides of an issue and promote a secret agenda with phony ‘front groups’ that spur debate, change, distract, etc is an integral part of this ancient and evolved system.


Bill said (October 10, 2011):

The question is, how will we know a genuine populist protest or revolution when we see one?

Isn’t it reasonable to assume that even a « legitimate » movement can be infiltrated, manipulated and derailed?

Imo, we are seeing a legitimate, spontaneous anti-Wall Street, anti-central banking movement being politicized and neutralized by TPTB and their mainstream stooges precisely because the movement IS organic and gaining traction.

The Mainstream Media has done its job by portraying the OWS protests as union-sponsored, anti-free market and pro-Marxist. No doubt, some of those occupying Wall Street fit the bill, but it is a gross over-simplification to characterized the motives of the masses of people participating as
« leftists » and malcontents just because a news-reader or commentator says so.

If the OWS protest is just another phony « color » revolution, why haven’t any spokespersons been identified? Why isn’t there a « color » associated with OWS? Where is the unified signage and sloganeering and t-shirts tying it all together with a coherent message and list of demands?

Because OWS began as a spontaneous, disparate movement, not of malcontents, but of concerned, patriotic Americans who may or may not be able to articulate a short list of demands, but know in their hearts and minds that something is very, very wrong.

What is Mr. Evan’s recommendation? Should they all just give up and go home because they’re being misrepresented in the press?

Enlighten us: What will a « genuine » people’s movement look like, if not just like this?

Bill

It will avoid the Communist symbolism and focus on the Fed and not capitalism.
henry


Tracy said (October 10, 2011):

As for your previous thoughts on the Occupy Wallstreet movement, which appears to be
quickly spreading – we could argue over whether it contains within it a true grassroots element.
But I’ll simply say that it’s one thing to incite people to protest. It’s entirely another thing to be able to control those protetsts. I have no doubt that the hands of the Cabal are all over this phenomena –

but I wonder if once they’ve tapped into American frustration, they’ll actually be able to dictate how protesters respond and thus the final outcome. I think the covert operatives are going to be in for quite a rude shock here. We’ll know for sure in a few months.


Michael Rivero (WRH) said (October 10, 2011):

The government must be scared to so recklessly use up so many assets!


Andrew said (October 10, 2011):

My congratulations to Richard Evans.

If you think about WHAT IS HAPPENING in American business terms, CANVAS is a « staffing company » like MANPOWER except it is in the business of OVERTHROWING GOVERNMENTS.

Toppling Governments, Inc. is just another BRAND.

Today it recruits young unemployed Americans (and there are Millions) to ride buses all over America and protest where assigned.

My cousin’s child is now working on the East Coast for a protest company called « Roadshow. »

They provide the entertainment, party and the girls.

This is the new cool way to do what the CIA used to do but making it seem spontaneous and progressive.

It is supposed to look like the kids dreamed-up this program of destabilization, but they are riding around HAVING A PARTY.

While they are having fun the managed news is amplifying and distorting their [the CIA sponsored organizers’] message.

I resent they are doing this NOW in America.

It is bad enough in Egypt, Tunisia, Yemen, Syria, etc. where people are getting killed.

For even more detail see http://alethonews.wordpress.com/2011/07/02/overthrow-inc-doing-what-the-cia-used-to-do-and-making-it-seem-progressive/
.

mercredi 4 mai 2011

DES REVOLUTIONS ARABES SPONTANEES ?


Devant le vent de révolution qui secoue le monde arabe, il est difficile de ne pas s’interroger. La question est de décrypter dans quelle mesure cette concomitance des évènements dans différents pays peut être la résultante d’une opération concertée. Ce qu’on est autorisé à penser sachant que des cadres du mouvement du 6 avril, qui a permis de chasser du pouvoir Hosni Moubarak, ont été formés à ce qu’il convient d’appeler « la révolution non violente ». Et il ne s’agirait pas d’un cas isolé. Il se trouve que de nombreux activistes de pays de l’Est, mais également du monde arabe et même d’Amérique du Sud, ont participé à des séminaires organisés en Serbie par CANVAS.

CANVAS : qui se cache derrière cet acronyme ?

CANVAS (Center for Applied Non Violent Action and Strategies1) n’est autre qu’une émanation du mouvement serbe OTPOR.
OTPOR, signifiant « Résistance » en serbe. Il s’agit d’une organisation politique considérée comme un acteur majeur de la chute de Slobodan Milosevic. Son logo est un poing noir fermé sur fond blanc.
Après la chute du régime de Milosevic, OTPOR est devenu le Centre de formation pour l’action non-violente. Des séminaires de formation à la lutte contre la fraude électorale dans les pays de l’Est furent les premières actions internationales de CANVAS.
Le but avoué de CANVAS est d’utiliser le savoir-faire d’OTPOR en matière de mouvements de protestation non violente.
Ainsi on retrouve la trace des « consultants » de CANVAS dans la révolution des roses en Géorgie.
En Ukraine, l’organisation PORA, très active durant la « révolution orange », a envoyé, en avril 2004, 18 de ses membres à Novi Sad, dans le nord de la Serbie, pour y suivre un séminaire. On notera également que peu avant les élections, un membre de CANVAS a été expulsé d’Ukraine.
CANVAS est également en étroite relation avec ZUBR, en Biélorussie, Cette organisation de droits civiques proche des idées occidentales a été créée en 2001 dans le but de renverser le régime d’Alexandre Lugachenko.
En 2002 on retrouve les traces de CANVAS au sein de l’opposition vénézuélienne.
En janvier et février 2011, le logo de CANVAS – qui est resté celui d’OTPOR – est brandi par les étudiants égyptiens du mouvement du 6 avril qui manifestent dans les rues du Caire. Mohamed Adel, ce blogueur égyptien un temps incarcéré pour délit d’opinion, reconnaît avoir effectué un stage auprès de cette organisation durant l’été 2009.

Quid du financement ?

Pour faire fonctionner une telle structure des moyens financiers considérables sont nécessaires.
CANVAS est-il financé par de riches philanthropes ayant pour seul but de construire un monde meilleur et de faire progresser la démocratie ?Si l’on en croit Srdja Popovic, fondateur d’OTPOR et actuel directeur de CANVAS, il ne reçoit que des subventions privées et aucun fonds gouvernementaux.
Il semble en fait qu’il en soit tout autre. Selon certaines sources généralement bien informées, deux organismes américains contribuent largement à son financement. Il s’agit de l’International Republican Institute et Freedom House.

– L’International Republican Institute2 est une organisation politique liée au Parti républicain. Son financement provient en majorité du gouvernement fédéral américain.
À noter qu’au printemps 2000 le colonel à la retraite de l’armée américaine Robert Helvey a été envoyé en Serbie par l’International Republican Institute pour diriger des séminaires sur la non violence au profit des militants d’OTPOR. Des milieux proches des services de renseignement occidentaux vont jusqu’à déclarer qu’en fait l’IRI ne serait rien d’autre qu’une façade de la CIA.

– Freedom House3, dont l’objectif affiché est d’exporter les valeurs américaines, a été dirigée par James Woolsey. Est-il utile de rappeler que ce dernier fut directeur de la CIA de 1993 à 1995 ?
À noter que la blogueuse égyptienne Israa Abdel Fattah, cofondatrice du mouvement du 6 avril, a fait partie d’un groupe d’activistes invité par Freedom House. Elle a pu ainsi participer à un programme destiné à former des « réformateurs politiques et sociaux ». Le tout était financé par l’USAID (United States Agency for International Development). Cette agence américaine a notamment pour but de réduire la pauvreté et de promouvoir la démocratie et la croissance économique.

Dans ces conditions, difficile de ne pas voir là une action, voire une manipulation, américaine, même si elle n’est pas forcément le seul fait de l’administration Obama.
Encore plus étonnant, si la presse occidentale a été très discrète à ce sujet – à de rares exceptions -elle a même passé sous silence le lien entre les évènements en cours dans le monde arabe et CANVAS. Et même les dénonciateurs habituels de la théorie du complot sont restés étonnamment muets…

Alain Charret
Rédacteur en chef de RENSEIGNOR
Mai 2011

Laisser un commentaire

Entrez vos coordonnées ci-dessous ou cliquez sur une icône pour vous connecter:

Logo WordPress.com

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte WordPress.com. Déconnexion / Changer )

Image Twitter

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte Twitter. Déconnexion / Changer )

Photo Facebook

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte Facebook. Déconnexion / Changer )

Photo Google+

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte Google+. Déconnexion / Changer )

Connexion à %s

%d blogueurs aiment cette page :